Cats are most active and generally hunt in the early morning, pre-dawn, and evenings. The "lazy" male lions that he's thinking of generally don't do much hunting. Bears hibernate because the alternative is starvation. You know what squirrels do? They play. Like ALL THE FUCKING TIME. Everything a squirrel does seems to be a game from foraging to fucking. When I don't see them playing, they're sprawled out relaxing. I'd rather be a squirrel.

That's an argument to be made, but I don't believe that is true at all. Sending one car to check on the safety/welfare of one active threat seems an entirely reasonable balance of risk. An unverified active threat is not at all the same as a confirmed active threat. That should be obvious simply by the existence of "swatting" as a common term and act these days.

It is not the duty of police to protect people from eminent harm, they have argued this themselves in court. Their job is strictly punitive, again an argument they have made in court many times. They only pretend to "protect and serve" when it suits their agenda of justification for their over inflated budgets. This isn't a public safety issue. It's a class warfare issue.

It wasn't supposed to "go" anywhere. It's a Tarantino film, so it's really more a meta movie about movies than most. The plot doesn't really matter. It's a movie about a particular time in Hollywood shot in the style of movie and TV Westerns that were very big in Hollywood, until they weren't, just like the protagonist and his stunt double. The whole film is shot like a Western. The title is a play on the title of another popular western. Like most Westerns, and indeed most of the west (the desolate desert cliche), on it's surface it's a "whole lot of nothing". The heart of most Westerns aren't really about the plot; it's the grit, the anti-heros, the everyday villains, the scenery, etc.

This new movie sounds interesting, but only because I liked the character of Cliff. This doesn't seem like a movie suited to a sequel without being boring. Cliff in a C3PO costume, a Spy movie, or some other idom feels like it would just cheapen the whole thing.

Slugs are related to snails so I'm just going to leave this here: The Snails and the Bees

So basically fungus and corals. That's fair. That sheep fruit though, sounds like a sex toy joke.

What's funny to me (and I know it's just meant to illustrate, not be perfect) is that the static in your example immediately jumps out to me as somehow not quite right too, just like the elements you pointed out in the AI slop image. Like I've spent so much time in my youth in the presence of the cosmic microwave background as seen through CRTs that I can sense its randomness and noise characteristics. I can't usually say why fake TV static looks wrong, but it always jumps out as wrong almost immediately. I've seen the same issue in lots of newer movies and shows set in the era of analog television, always immediately pulls me out of the story.

The issue isn't about what it can and can't do, it's that it is CONSTANTLY attempting to step in and "fix" my spreadsheet in bizarrely inane ways. Why won't it give me the "shut up and stay the fuck out of my way" option? There is no option to remove or silence copilot. That damn thing follows my cursor like a ring wraith after Frodo. It has already fucked up more than one of my spreadsheets without asking or being asked. If I hadn't been paying attention, I might not have caught the absolutely bat shit insane edits it was making to simple and correct functions I'd already entered. No, copilot you don't know what I'm doing. Clippy was less intrusive.

I've been there. It's hard. Please continue to be idealistic about the potential of people. Balancing hope against grounded expectations is a worthy goal though.

If you (not you specifically) already believe that you are a good person, will you continue to work to be a good person? I know that for me, I feel better believing that I am not actually good, but that I'm trying to be. I feel that holding on to that idea will serve me best. And it doesn't hurt to remember that other people are also often just trying to be that better person in their own way (or at least I hope most are, some obviously don't consider it at all). Of course people will disagree about what that looks like for themselves and others. Empathy isn't an end or a given, it's constant work.

Don't worry. Time is a flat circle. What is old, is new again. Smart glasses will get smaller and more discreet packages and the kids will forget the original chunky look that meant "potential invasion of privacy". I like what I like and I'm content to remain true to that until the merry-go-round of fashion comes back around again. Sometimes I may hop on a new trend and take the ride a bit, but it's always my choice. Nostalgia is often used as a derogatory term by trendy/edgy people to feel superior about picking some style that is new to them. That fashion is almost always someone else's "nostalgia". Fashion is all just picking and choosing which spot on the nostalgia merry-go-round feels right for us in this moment.

You've never really spent much time with infants and young children have you? Empathy is a skill we learn in order to survive in our social system. It is not something we are born with. We are born as bundles of pure self without any sense of other things as independent things that exist even when we can't perceive them (let alone other independent selves like us). As we mature, empathy is a choice we cultivate in our selves. I may believe that most people are basically good (or want to be good) and everyone has the potential to be good, but no one is born "good". When we are born, good and bad are concepts that have no meaning to us beyond what is good or bad specifically and only for ourselves.

Give em The Harkness Test