Just a reminder that everyone is a criminal, but only the out group get the punishments. It's practically impossible these days to do anything without running afoul of some law somewhere, especially when the new fascist regime is turning your old civil rights into new felonies every day. Fed the homeless? Criminal. Shelter an abused person? Trafficking. Give water to a protestor? To an immigrant? Aiding terrorists. Exercising your right to protest? Actual terrorist. Be a librarian? Obscenity. Report facts and statistics? Treason. Give medical care to the wrong person? Felony. Fail to pay debt? (often debt you had no choice about taking on, like debts to courts, medical, and school debts) Criminal. Insist on a separation between church and state? Hate speech. Resist a kidnapping by anonymous men in an anonymous van? Resisting arrest and deported, yes even the legal citizens. These are just the spicy examples. There are plenty of other more mundane crimes that everyone commits every day. The system is too corrupt and complicated to completely avoid breaking the law.

"pretty easy" is a bit of a stretch

Yeah, I'd say they should only have shared it with the news if the news also named and identified them clearly every time the photos are shared. Corruption dies in sunlight. The dangerous ones already know, might as well hang a lantern on any attempts at retaliation.

Why not keep it simpler with one commandment:

Thou shalt not make a machine in the likeness of a human mind.

He can absolutely see through those cards. We trust that he's not cheating the same way we trust anyone isn't cheating any other time. She probably wouldn't actually be that into him (and they would have never been an item) if he wasn't already better than most men at handling and controlling his emotions. (I think Worf was her "Bad Boy" phase because he is so awful at controlling his and just funnels everything into angry sex.) Point being, if anyone can bluff her, it's him. Probabilities are useful, but counting cards in most poker variants isn't that much of an advantage.

There's a lot of people in this thread proudly sharing how they stereotype and have preconceptions about people that they don't actually know. And them their justification is that everyone should be a two dimensional single issue character archetype with literally no conflict or contradictions. Have you people even met any adults, especially professionals and academics, that aren't your parents or your teachers?

I can tell that this particular port is more or less from the same time as the PS2 ports in the post's photo because of the color. The standardization of this port happened long before the standardization of colors to indicate the capabilities of said port. We mostly only see this in variously capable USB ports today. If I remember correctly this yellow color would have been used for a joystick or controller of some kind, but there may have been other ports with the same shape and pin configuration that would have different purposes.

Zebras are black horses with white stripes.

I was just pointing to the simplest answer I had, which didn't rely on a bunch of circumstantial and vague hunches. Since you take issue with that, I guess I'll rant a bit.

Fake photos have been a thing as long a photos have been. Very little has changed in that regard. The various tips and tricks to spot AI fakes will become obsolete a lot faster than the other critical thinking skills needed to decipher fact from fiction in any other medium: news articles, YouTube videos, social media, etc. This will be especially true as the tools used to make these images will evolve. One of those critical thinking skills is tracing a claim, especially a repeated claim, back to it's source. Another is looking at the timeline of the spread of the meme. These both involve gathering actual evidence and work for a variety of mediums. This is why so many lamented the death of rigorous independent journalism. Suddenly the news becomes so much more trouble to trust and to verify. AI is here just a fungus feeding off the corpse of journalism in the dense jungle of the death of critical thinking in the news consuming public.

My teacher one year gave me an F because he didn't bother to grade anything in a timely fashion, also didn't store (or organize) any student assignments that had been handed in, and when the end of the year came made me go digging through a giant stack of everyone's assignments to find mine to prove I deserved a reasonable grade AFTER I had already been sent home with an F. I eventually got the grade I deserved, but I shouldn't have had to fight for it like that. Apparently this was a common routine for this teacher, but lots of students didn't bother to fight it. It didn't get fixed until that cabinet was physically emptied and I handed all the assignments back to their authors.

I am thinking of the teachers. And I think OPs situation is remarkably similar. But kids, being kids, will not be heard by adults when they shout warnings, like "Why haven't you graded and returned any of my assignments yet this term?" or "This valuable/dangerous thing should be secured, who responsibility is that?" It may not be moral advice, but like the song says, sometimes you have to be cruel to be kind.

If you were in highschool at the time, really the only ethical thing to do for someone in your position is to delete all the files and shine a light on their bad security practices, but don't say anything about it to anyone. It's that last bit that always gets you in trouble. Absolute candor is something adults almost never want to hear from children.

Also, I'm pretty sure I saw this pic being meme long before AI images were a thing.