107
I quite dislike the word "quishing"
It sounds like the "shart" equivalent but with a queef instead of a fart.
It describes the water breaking
qhy?
It sounds like I stepped on a slug.
On cam. For money.
Or at least for a loot box, if the AI likes you.
It sounds like an old timey STD, like chlamydia but instead of having the clap ya have the quish. Quick someone help me come up with symptoms, I'm going with necrosis since it can make flesh squishy and that sounds about right for the name.
Took me a while to figure out what it meant, « QR Code Fishing »
I still think it might be a sex act.
I'm confused, isn't this just as risky as seeing a URL in the wild and typing it into your phone? Don't all phones display the URL you are about to visit?
The problem isn't the QR code itself, correct? It's a lack of education, and an incurious public that has no interest in learning about the technology that they depend on.
Seems like a skill issue.
No, because phones don't show the URL you are going to. I can go to a restaurant and scan the menu, but the link that it shows me is "qrl.io/asccand....." because A) the restaurant used a URL shortener, and B) the phone truncates the URL to fit in the space.
My phone gives me about 20 characters.
malicious qr codes have always been around. i remember the local news reports of them plastered to store directories at the mall. ya, that long ago.
I remember going to defcon in 2016 and there was a guy wielding a foam sword with a qr code t-shirt that said "scan me", and when you scanned it and told him it said "arrrr", he'd beat you with the sword while berating you for scanning an untrusted code.
Damn I'm just realizing that was almost 10 years ago
Yeah. Took like a day after they were publicly available , lol
Yup, they were always a terrible idea
Please note: Le source is le NordVPN
Just saying:
The statistic can not be applied to the wider population, since People who use such Services on a day to day Basis are usually the same ones who believe the lies NordVPN is throwing at them.
It would be like going to a ecstasy dealer and asking them how many people like drugs. Of course they will answer everyone, first because they have an incentive to advertise their services (nord advertises their VPN + Antivirus for blocking Malware) and even if they try to be neutral, they just don't have the data, since people who go to a Dealer are likely to like drugs, the same way people who believe Nord are the same ones who are likely to fall for such things
It really does irk me that they pretend their service makes the internet safer for their users.
They have a good product in their VPN+Meshnet, but it wouldn’t have nearly the broad appeal it does if they were honest about it.
I find it difficult to have sympathy for people who suffer predictable consequences after scanning unknown QR codes left in public.
I don't go around scanning random codes, but often times I have to scan a code for something like paying for parking. How can I know if someone put a sticker over it with a malicious URL?
What about the loads of restaurants that use them for menus?
A QR code handed to you by a restaurant employee would not be "unknown." I was thinking of codes found left at a bus stop or something.
Also, QR code menus are a dick move by a restaurant, and I would just walk out, personally.
Clearly those restaurants are cheap shitholes and don't deserve business. What ever happened to having a board, if you don't want individual menus just put up a couple boards that are visible from the tables and booths.
Wow that’s a great (criminal) idea to make money. I guess that’s fraud? I suppose it depends on the wording and the fine print.
this post was submitted on 27 Jul 2025
107 points (100.0% liked)
News
31294 readers
2906 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS