275
submitted 1 day ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) by kebab@endlesstalk.org to c/politics@lemmy.world
top 45 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] zbyte64@awful.systems 26 points 22 hours ago

If we just uncapped social security contributions this wouldn't be an issue. This is a manufactured crisis to convince people that socialism doesn't work and we should go back to barbarism.

[-] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 11 points 18 hours ago

Exactly. SS is the easiest problem in DC to solve.

They don't have to remove the cap, just raise it. Right now, it's around $167K. Just raise it to $250K, or $500K, or $1 million. That would make it solvent again for decades.

[-] burgerpocalyse@lemmy.world 3 points 16 hours ago

we could just remove the cap and never worry about it again for as long as we can avoid dying from extreme weather

[-] RoidingOldMan@lemmy.world 65 points 1 day ago

Do I get to pay 24% less social security tax?

[-] womjunru@lemmy.cafe 35 points 1 day ago

Hehe. You know the answer to that.

[-] kebab@endlesstalk.org 26 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

You need to be rich enough to qualify for the tax cuts I guess

[-] jimjam5@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

That’s the shit that gets me riled up. Maybe it’s a bad take, but if social security is shrinking and won’t be there for us when we reach retirement age, government should get their fuckin hands off my paychecks. Why do we have to fund billionaires and their toxic yacht tendencies? Why the fuck do they need a dollar more??

[-] zbyte64@awful.systems 2 points 22 hours ago

The only reason SS wouldn't pay out is if you don't qualify or it is repealed (or they break the operations so it doesn't work). It will be there when you retire at a reduced rate. If we uncapped the SS contributions the that problem goes away.

[-] forrgott@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 17 hours ago

I wish that were true. But it's getting sabotaged, one little bit at a time. Death by a thousand cuts.

[-] Broken@lemmy.ml 2 points 21 hours ago

That depends on when you're retiring. The money is running out, period. The fact that its running out in the 2030s isn't news (the article even states this hit to SS only changes things by a year), and that payments will be reduced is true. But a 50 year old will get that radically reduced rate, but get something. A 20 year old really doesn't have that guarantee, especially with how freely the rules can change by the time they hit retirement age.

We're at the tipping point, so of course there's a lot of upheaval about it, but there really hasn't been a definitive plan (let alone a good one) on how to change this predicament so that resting on "you'll get something" seems optimistic at best.

[-] zbyte64@awful.systems 1 points 18 hours ago

The only way money is running out is if people stop paying into the system altogether. As long as people pay into SS there is money to distribute.

[-] forrgott@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 16 hours ago

https://www.cnbc.com/select/will-social-security-run-out-heres-what-you-need-to-know/

https://abcnews.go.com/Business/social-security-fund-run-dry-sooner-previously-expected/story?

https://www.newsweek.com/social-security-running-out-money-trustees-report-2087749

I did a quick Google search, and this is just a random sampling of the results. What you are saying is false. Period. I don't know if you're intentionally lying or not, but it's frankly embarrassing to see someone try to argue against reality.

[-] zbyte64@awful.systems 3 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

From the first article:

Social Security will still exist after 2035, according to the report. But without congressional action, retirees will only receive 83% of their full benefits.

Insolvent doesn't mean it goes away, it means reduced payment.

Please don't attack my intellect without comprehending your own sources.

[-] forrgott@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 16 hours ago

Lol

Whatever dude

[-] HubertManne@piefed.social 4 points 1 day ago

if you did would it allow you to cover expenses in retirement?

[-] PattyMcB@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

Retirement... HAH!

(That'll never happen for me)

[-] HubertManne@piefed.social 3 points 1 day ago

Thats what I mean. Losing a quarter of what is inadequate to pay bills is going to be worse than the taxes on you job barely paying bills now being slightly lower.

[-] PattyMcB@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

I'm not disagreeing. I was adding my anecdotal example as agreement, with a side order of snark

[-] ElectricWaterfall@lemmy.zip 23 points 1 day ago

Why do the rich want more money? What does it get them at this point?

[-] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 5 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

It's a mental illness, like hoarding. Most people know when to quit, but these people don't, and that's because they have an abnormal compulsion to keep accumulating more, even though they already have more than they or their descendants could ever spend.

We shouldn't let our nation and planet go to Hell because everybody is afraid to force these Psychopathic Oligarchs to take medication for their mental illness, or even say No to their unreasonable demands. The result is that we end up with people so wealthy that they can finance their most psychotic fantasies.

[-] forrgott@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 17 hours ago

I agree with all of this, just want to add a little bit: these treated fucks are literally offended that we have anything. Because then we don't "remember our place" or whatever.

[-] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 2 points 16 hours ago

Let’s say you didn’t know you were going to be well off. You paid into SS like everyone else. Later in life you find yourself worth a few millions for whatever reason, maybe a lifetime of good jobs work and wise investing. You don’t get any money back? Unfortunately a lot of people will call a few million after a lifetime of work and investing “rich.”

Now if you’re worth many tens or hundreds of millions or more, or you were born into wealth, maybe getting SS shouldn’t really be on the table.

[-] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

Psychopathy.

I've got a hot take, this is what happens when a country model itself to the Roman Empire. Yes, they have got civil codes and institutions impressive for "civilised society", but the society is based on slavery, was well known for decadence and last but not least-- imperialism. Notice that countries that took inspiration from Roman Empire end up collapsing. Britain, Germany, France, Italy and Russia had empires and collapsed, and soon the USA. Imperialism carried over to these countries that tried to claim to be either the second or third Rome, or another "shining beacon on the hill". What end up happening is bloated bureaucracy, growth of cancerous decadent oligarchy and overextending its power. Why not just try to be humble and be like small countries, such as Switzerland or Ireland? They have no rabid, overcompensating collective egoism that try to beat everyone else, and going on false pretense on "civilising" the natives to merely acquire resources. Or, try to be China in any form, just don't expand and simply do its own thing by being the centre of trade and commerce by virtue of its own size and abundant resources.

Feel free to disagree, but growing up in post-colonial country, I can't help but criticise the Roman Empire and the West's obsession with it. I always think that the long dead nation of Rome is overrated for aforementioned reasons.

[-] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 1 points 17 hours ago

You're probably correct in your assessment, but the bottom line is that ALL countries eventually collapse, no matter what model they adopt. Even those that claim an ancient lineage, like China, have reinvented themselves multiple times, just keeping the name.

[-] PalmTreeIsBestTree@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

America’s fall isn’t too much different from the Roman Republic’s own fall. Trump wants to be Caesar and he will probably get betrayed pretty soon like Caesar considering all the Epstein stuff.

[-] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 2 points 17 hours ago

Brought down by his own allies. It happens more often than people think. Many world leaders have been assassinated by their own side, or even highly trusted associates.

[-] Drusas@fedia.io 5 points 1 day ago
[-] wirebeads@lemmy.ca 38 points 1 day ago

The rich aren’t getting richer by not being handed over your money in the biggest transfer of wealth ever.

America got F-U-C-K-E-D over good by Trump. I’d expect nothing less from a vile human being that rapes 12 year olds, but that’s just me.

[-] pennomi@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago

He said 12 is too young for him. Much more correct to say 13 year olds.

[-] ramble81@lemmy.zip 14 points 1 day ago

So suddenly I can’t check on ssa.gov because they’re “having problems” but the last I saw I had already contributed over $180,000 and I’m in my mid-40s. There’s a high probability I won’t see a dime. That’s $180K that I could have had in an IRA or other retirement account working to my benefit.

I was all for Social Security when I knew one day I’d be able to partake in it too, but with everything going on, fuck that and give me my money back.

[-] zbyte64@awful.systems 5 points 22 hours ago

I was all for Social Security when I knew one day I’d be able to partake in it too, but with everything going on, fuck that and give me my money back.

Mission accomplished. SS is one of the most successful government programs and we can't have that!

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 2 points 20 hours ago

That's why the cons do everything in their power to call it into question.

Same thing goes for things like the USPS and public education...the cons keeping fucking with, and trying to demonize those as well.

[-] aramova@infosec.pub 7 points 1 day ago

Yeah checked mine as well, guess Big Balls broke the database while they were making copies for DOG-E.

[-] cabron_offsets@lemmy.world 24 points 1 day ago

Vote for republicans and suffer the consequences.

[-] spaghettiwestern@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Magats will blame Biden and the MSM won't say a word.

[-] misteloct@lemmy.dbzer0.com 20 points 1 day ago

By the time I retire, social security will be negative. Turn 79.5, you pay them $500/mo.

[-] null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 1 day ago

I genuinely would like to know what portion of social security recipients voted for this or did not vote.

[-] PattyMcB@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago

I guarantee a majority of them voted for this. Especially the retired portion

[-] jimjam5@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

My parents did, are currently receiving SS checks, and are still in denial about *everything*

[-] Frozengyro@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

My father, who never saved a dime in his life and will be fully dependent on social security in retirement, voted for it and thinks this is the best thing to ever happen to America. Gonna be a wake up call when he can't ever afford to retire.

[-] null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 day ago

Gonna be a wake up call

Sadly I don't think that will be the case.

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 3 points 20 hours ago

"Why did Hillary/Biden/Obama/Kamala do this to me?"

[-] osaerisxero@kbin.melroy.org 4 points 1 day ago

And don't worry, it's going to be your fault that this is happening to him.

[-] moobythegoldensock@infosec.pub 6 points 1 day ago

4 years after he’s safely out of office, at which point they’ll blame the Democrats.

this post was submitted on 26 Jul 2025
275 points (100.0% liked)

politics

24959 readers
2375 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS