This would have been disqualifying for any public official not so long ago. Now politicos lie, flip-flop and grift freely and openly, and it's just a fact of life. Like it was normal or something...
we are in a post-truth era
We always were. Try to fact-check me.
Cuz... We're in a post-tr- No, no, yeah, you get it. I don't have to explain the joke.
We’re in a pre-truth era. Always have been.
At this point, we can just take it as read that Gabbard has no principles and no integrity at all, and every single thing she says is a reflection of that complete and total lack.
We can assume that for this whole administration.
I think she has a couple of core convictions, and that’s she’s willing to do anything to gain power to enforce them.
Like I don’t say that admiringly. I think she’s a zealot that’s just riding what ever wave it takes.
Goes Viral
No it hasn't. They want it to, but it ain't happening.
🎼 🎶 Trump is in the Epstein files!
doo-dah doo-dah 🪕
Trump is in the Epstein files!
all the doo-dah day! 🎶
Trump not like us.
She keeps talking and all I hear from her is “Trump raped kids and I’m helping him try to get away with it”
Flash forward to Tulsi pleading the fifth so she doesn't have to admit she was part of the treasonous conspiracy. The implication that the current DNI and Secretary of State are complicit in treason is very funny, of course. We're really circling the drain, folks.


update: it goes deeper…

Kinda funny. For a long time she was a burden on the Democrats. Now she's a burden on the GOP. She's like one of those professional athletes who somehow cons their way into club after club despite having a shite performance history and no discernable positive traits.
Edit: typo fix.
I always wonder at what point the obvious misdirection and projection become too much for me to bear. Edit: jk it was a while ago, and also very much their intention.
politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:

- Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
- No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
- No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News