469
submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by Davriellelouna@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] AlexLost@lemmy.world 139 points 1 week ago

Is he dating the Epstein files? The fucking president of the country doesn't get the luxury of space, he is beholden to the office to answer to the people. What a joke of a country.

[-] criss_cross@lemmy.world 106 points 1 week ago

It must be so hard suffering the mildest of consequences of your own actions.

[-] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 28 points 1 week ago

your own horrific actions

[-] Kyrgizion@lemmy.world 80 points 1 week ago

Here I am, regularly feeling guilty about whether maybe I accidentally insulted someone with my autism, while people like these lie openly, constantly and with impunity. A conscience really is a goddamn hindrance in this world rather than a net positive.

A conscience really is a goddamn hindrance in this world rather than a net positive.

Sort of. People without a conscience and without the power, privilege and/or social tools to abuse that often also end up pretty badly. Like how narcissism can lead both to (unwanted) social isolation, or even prison time, and then also sometimes to a successful business/political career or creating your own adoring cult, depending on other factors, both intrinsic and extrinsic to the person.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Whats_your_reasoning@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago

I’d say the lack of a conscience is the real hindrance. If more people cared about the consequences of their actions, we’d be in a better place. It’s just a shame so many psychopaths are able to flourish.

[-] peoplebeproblems@midwest.social 68 points 1 week ago

He's the president. He doesn't get space. Ever.

That's literally the job of the president. It's not luxury. It's work.

But this jackass in the oval office has never worked a day in his entire fucking life and doesn't understand that concept.

[-] dwemthy@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago

Even if he does get space: it's not the job of the speaker of the fucking house to give him space from investigations. The house is supposed to investigate!

[-] hperrin@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 week ago

If you add up all the work he’s done throughout his whole life, it might add up to about a day.

[-] fluxion@lemmy.world 45 points 1 week ago

"So-called Christian helps to cover up a giant pedophile ring"

[-] hperrin@lemmy.ca 26 points 1 week ago

Isn’t that a fairly normal thing for Christians?

[-] zbyte64@awful.systems 9 points 1 week ago

So normal we already know the justification: for the glory of God 🙄

[-] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

They built a huge organisation that's been around for over 1000 years just for the purpose.

[-] IhaveCrabs111@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

Story as old as religion itself

[-] Treczoks@lemmy.world 40 points 1 week ago

The space Trump actually needs is a 3x4m prison cell.

[-] Poem_for_your_sprog@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

Make that feet and we have a deal.

[-] lemmy_outta_here@lemmy.world 36 points 1 week ago

Trump needs ‘space’ for a specific purpose: avoiding the consequences of his crimes. Republicans are always ready to give him that space.

[-] prole 32 points 1 week ago

Awww does the felonious pedophile need space???

[-] moobythegoldensock@infosec.pub 6 points 1 week ago

You can’t distance yourself without space.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Zier@fedia.io 27 points 1 week ago

I am happy to give him space... in a maximum security prison cell, all alone until the very end.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] frezik 25 points 1 week ago

Oh, good. For a moment there it almost seemed like Johnson had a spine.

[-] breecher@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 week ago

Never trust anything they say, it was pure posturing. Judge them for their actions, or lack of them. So when one of those inbred sycophants says they are going against Trump, don't believe them until they actually do (which will be never).

[-] frezik 3 points 1 week ago

So I think this is actually a little bit of a naive viewpoint. The next level beyond it is to consider why they're saying something. You don't have to assume they're telling the truth, but politicians say things for a strategically chosen reason.

I do think the fact that Johnson even piped up about the Epstein files is meaningful. There is a break in the thinking between the coalitions of the Republican parties. Johnson was probably trying to woo some of them, got pressured, and then backed off. But even the fact that he had to be pressured means they had to expend effort to keep him in line. That can't keep working forever.

Which is also why I think the Epstein files are no mere distraction. There is a breakdown, and they're not easily falling in line.

[-] zbyte64@awful.systems 3 points 1 week ago

He was willing until his donors told him it would be bad for them as well.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 25 points 1 week ago

Last week: "We need to release the files."

This week: "Dear leader said no. I never implied anything different."

[-] santa@sh.itjust.works 21 points 1 week ago

Plenty of “space” on golf course.

Do your job. Oh wait. You are. Protecting yer guy.

[-] zbyte64@awful.systems 3 points 1 week ago

I think he didn't realize how many of his donors don't want the list released. I bet there's a good number of billionaires on the list.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Asafum@feddit.nl 21 points 1 week ago

"Listen bucko, this is Congress, specifically a Republican Congress. We serve two people here, the president and the ownership class. Notice how I didn't mention voters? They can go fuck themselves. Didn't we make that obvious with the Big Disgusting Bill?"

[-] mister_flibble@sh.itjust.works 18 points 1 week ago
[-] anarchiddy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 1 week ago

The more he runs away from this the more likely that nobody will believe whatever explanation he lands on to dismiss it. Even if there really isn't a list, and he really isn't on it, and they present some evidence that proves it conclusively, there's zero shot anyone will believe it.

The conspiracy vibes are so strong that even reality couldn't kill them.

[-] iAvicenna@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

he needs ~~space~~ to be spaced

[-] mondomon@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago

Presidents don't "get space".

[-] blarth@thelemmy.club 11 points 1 week ago

Actually, Michael, what he needs is to be fully outed as one of the pedos his base so vehemently abhors.

[-] drhodl@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago

Mike Johnson made me loathe christianity. He's a smarmy little cunt germ.

[-] CarrmynCarnage 11 points 1 week ago

Yes, I agree, Mike. Airlock, it is.

[-] SeductiveTortoise@piefed.social 10 points 1 week ago

Trump needs a kick to the balls, that's what he needs. And then another one, until everyone on earth had the opportunity.

[-] Asswardbackaddict@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

Just so we're clear, he's completely within his rights — per the landmark 1849 case Cowboys v. Indians, which famously established the "time-outs and tag-backs" precedent.

[-] skozzii@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 week ago

"They haven't deleted and scrubbed Trump's name off the documents yet , so we need more time."

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Zephorah@discuss.online 10 points 1 week ago

There are a couple Republican threads hyper focused on some “Obama written” Russian files thing. And how Hillary’s emails have only “scratched the surface”.

No idea. Except it sounds like they’re grasping at straws of distraction. Even so, the Repub people are eating it up.

[-] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

Space to rape more children.

[-] Zachariah@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

He should take a one way ride up in a Starliner. Plenty of space for him in there.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Empricorn@feddit.nl 9 points 1 week ago

I agree with Johnson. Let's eject our rapist-felon president into space.

[-] WanderWisley@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

If by space you mean being thrown into a black hole then yeah. But seriously trumps a child fucker and the GOP is trying to hide it.

[-] Steve@startrek.website 6 points 1 week ago

Aww poor baby is stressed because everyone knows he fucked a child.

[-] Nougat@fedia.io 4 points 1 week ago

Looks like someone had a conversation with Mikey.

[-] pinheadednightmare@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

Fuck you Johnson.

[-] shiroininja@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Awww, the National pedophile needs space

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 22 Jul 2025
469 points (100.0% liked)

politics

25032 readers
2261 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS