585
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world 5 points 4 days ago

I can fix.. wait, no, she’s perfect.

[-] tacosanonymous@mander.xyz 17 points 6 days ago

I was on her side until I read the article. She chased this person an unspecified distance in her car, blocked the chicken killer's car with her own, then attempted to open their car door, before settling on macing them.

Fuck that impatient chicken killer but you don’t get to do a road rage for some vigilante justice. This was just two psychopaths being brought together by circumstance.

[-] cdf12345@lemmy.zip 7 points 6 days ago

Nah, fuck that chicken killer FAFO

JURY NULLIFICATION

[-] Aggravationstation@feddit.uk 6 points 6 days ago

It was almost at the other side, you bastard!

[-] Gammelfisch@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago

The driver who killed the chicken is a shit stain and she will eventually kill someone. Imagine if that a child, elderly person or someone on a wheelchair.

[-] YiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.today 3 points 6 days ago

Is this it? Is this the answer?

[-] neons@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 6 days ago

Clearly didn't play Zelda

[-] ArtVandelay@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago

I'm getting strong Marta vibes from arrested development with this one

[-] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 189 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

The way this kind of animal murder is normalized for drivers is beyond disturbing. Imagine a cyclist who came upon some birds blocking the cycle path, pulled out a pocket knife, and started stabbing them so they could get through 20 seconds faster.

It's the same psychopathic "might makes right" mentality that makes people turn a blind eye to the needless, systemic, unfathomable horrors of animal agriculture.

[-] Fondots@lemmy.world 41 points 1 week ago

I have a Belgian Malinois, which, if you're not aware, is basicallythe breed of dog used by military and police that aren't German Shepherds. They are absolute maniacs of dogs, full of all kinds of prey drive and herding instincts and such that have long-since been bred out of your average family pet.

So for a while when I still had a Facebook I followed a couple of Malinois pages to help me better understand what was going on in my dog's head.

Now some malinois owners are great, they understand the reasons why their dogs are the way they are and understand how to manage them properly.

Others are absolute assholes who just wanted the really cool supersoldier dog that can run up walls and eat bad guys, and don't really do anything to channel that energy properly

I remember one post in particular of some guy's dog "playing" with a turtle, picking it up, throwing it around, etc.

I'm a dog owner, I've at times dabbled in hunting, I'm an environmentalist and conservationist, I know what sort of laws are out there and what is and isn't allowed. And people are stupid and make entirely too much information about themselves available online.

So I could see from this guy's profile what state (and in fact what city he was in, what high school he went to what company he works for, etc.)

And I could easily Google what the laws in that state are

And lol and behold, allowing your dog to harass wildlife is not allowed in that state. There were fines, potentially prison time, the officials could even take your dog and have them destroyed over this. I think it might have even been legal, maybe even encouraged, in that state for anyone witnessing this happening to just shoot your dog on the spot.

I of course wasn't about to report this guy over this, I didn't want his dog put down or anything, I just wanted him to be a better, more responsible dog owner, so I pointed this out in the comments, that were, up until that point, mostly just other assholes jerking each other off over how cool malinois are.

He, of course, quickly took the past down after that.

But not before a whole bunch of people got really pissy about me looking at his profile (to see the information about himself that he made publicly available I guess?) and taking the time to Google the relevant laws in his state so that I could point out exactly why what he was doing wasn't just morally wrong but actually illegal.

There were disturbingly few people commenting on that post who were simply angry that this jackass was letting his dog fuck with a turtle.

As an aside, my dog is a rare "lazy" malinois. She's still more energetic and driven than pretty much any other dog I've ever met, there's a part of her that definitely wants to eat someone's face, but she's content to sleep on the couch all day instead. She definitely would chase some rabbits, deer, foxes, squirrels, etc. given the chance (I don't give her the chance,) and she's never seen a turtle, but she seems to like just sniffing and occasionally licking frogs and toads (I try not to let her, but she occasionally finds them before I do on our walks, the amphibians seem mildly annoyed by this, but not enough to hop away from her, and I make sure to get her away from them ASAP so that they can continue frogging undisturbed.)

[-] Godric@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago

Stalking people online is fucking creepy, no wonder people got "pissy".

[-] Grostleton@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 4 days ago

People trying to label the act of viewing information willfully placed on a public profile as "stalking" just highlights their own technological illiteracy.

Don't want random passersby seeing inside your internet equivalent of a street facing window? Close the curtains.

[-] Godric@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago

It's not "tech illiteracy" you muppet, a person standing with their nose to your front window is fine for you? You must be overjoyed with how much data megacorps collect on you to microtarget ads because you provided it.

[-] Grostleton@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 4 days ago

I'm not, which is why I don't make information I don't want to be publicly scrutinized visible on pages any rando can access by simply clicking a link plastered under/on my name, you ignoramus.

[-] Fondots@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago

i don't know if you can really call it stalking if they're willingly making information about themselves available for anyone to see. I didn't have to so much as punch his name into google, just click his name at the top of his post and it was all there for anyone to see.

He didn't have to put his information out there and make it publicly available, but presumably he was ok with everyone on Facebook having access to that information about him.

And if he wasn't ok with that, it made him realize his error so he could address it.

Your dog is chill because of the regular frog licking, having achieved inner dog balance through psychedelics lol

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
[-] nokturne213@sopuli.xyz 105 points 1 week ago

When I was a kid there was a turtle on a bridge, my mom stopped so I could move it off the bridge. Some asshole swerved to hit it while I was walking towards it. I picked up a rock and threw it at his car I was so mad.

[-] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 36 points 1 week ago

That was Shredder.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 60 points 1 week ago

i cannot put into words how much i despise people who don't see anything wrong with crushing animals with their car, it's so fucking gross and IMO should disqualify them from handling a heavy vehicle.

It's no different than shooting animals with a gun (proper or airsoft or whatever), which i think any sensible person would agree should bar you from owning guns.

[-] TranscendentalEmpire@lemmy.today 30 points 1 week ago

It's no different than shooting animals with a gun (proper or airsoft or whatever), which i think any sensible person would agree should bar you from owning guns.

I think there's quite a big difference between senselessly running over an animal and shooting one with a gun. I mean hunting for food and animal population control are kinda necessary in a lot of situations, while running over an animal isn't.

load more comments (15 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[-] VerilyFemme 44 points 1 week ago

The chicken didn't cross the road, but still made it to the other side.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] AlecSadler 39 points 1 week ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] salty_chief@lemmy.world 39 points 1 week ago

This lady was like, I finally get to ask the chicken why it crossed the road. Then this dude comes and takes it out!

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] ijedi1234@sh.itjust.works 34 points 1 week ago

I have no tolerance for people that murder birds. I hope the bear mace hurt.

[-] WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today 31 points 1 week ago

Good! Those sre future serial killers!

[-] TuffNutzes@lemmy.world 30 points 1 week ago

20 years ago I was driving on a 50mph road and there was this group of about 20 birds drinking water around a large puddle right on the side of the road.

Something spooked them just in the moment that I was driving by them. In that split second, they all swarmed right in front of my vehicle smashed into the side and front. As I looked back in the mirror through the feathers floating in the air, I could see at least six or seven birds injured on the road behind me. It made me sick to my stomach and I still have this image in my head years later haunting me.

I can't imagine someone would do that on purpose.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] dukatos@lemmy.zip 26 points 1 week ago

Deserved... It could be a child instead of chicken.

[-] noxypaws@pawb.social 1 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

The single most memorable part of Twin Peaks season 3 was this exact scenario but with a child, while the mother watched the whole thing, horrified.

edit: okay not exactly like that, the hit and run driver in the Twin Peaks episode didn't stop and honk, they were just in the wrong lane from the get-go. But still very similar situation

CW: a fictional portrayal of a child dying to a hit and run accident: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V62BJFn-BTQ

[-] mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca 28 points 1 week ago

in this case, this is especially relevant

The woman stopped to let the chicken cross the road, so there was clearly something happening and obviously some sort of reason that this person was stopped in the road, and the driver behind them sped around and hit the chicken. that 100% could have been a pet or infant or child instead

The woman who hit the chicken made the explicit decision to ignore the warnings that were evident, and still hit something. fucking abhorrent behaviour

load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 20 Jul 2025
585 points (100.0% liked)

Not The Onion

17394 readers
1051 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS