It should be pointed out that (according to exit polls) 80% of Black voters voted for Harris. I've heard so many people blaming them for Trump, but they're not the problem here.
It was sadly Latinos who voted more for him this time. Maybe some Asian groups too.
I believe her most reliable supporters were Black Women, Jewish Women, Black Men, Jewish Men
In that order
Not as a whole, but the margins were so thin in some states that Trump won that if Harris didn't lose that small percentage of Black voters, she might have swung enough states to win the election.
I'm trying to imagine being a black voter and voting for the blatantly racist white candidate.
I'm not having a lot of success.
Misogyny and bravado. Same for a lot of the Latino and Muslim communities. If the election were rerun tomorrow they'd probably just not vote. People with these personalities will never vote for a woman.
Which, sadly, is why the Dems need to stop nominating women for president if we're ever able to have free elections again. I don't have much hope that will happen, though, since he's admitted he only "won" the 2024 election because "Elon knows how those vote counting machines work."
There were gains? Voters have the attention span of a Chihuahua.
I'll believe it when they take it to the voting booth, until then it's just hot air and false hope.
Fucking morons.
Too late. It's amazing that Americans still think that there will be another fair election that they can take this all back.
Even black folk have their fair share of Candace Owen “pick mes.” Massah always has his fair share of sambo house slaves who think they are massahs favorites like Tim Scott.
(I’m black so fuck you if you say I’m being racist here)
Why the fuck would black voters go for the guy who wanted to have the exonerated Central Park 5 executed? You know, the same guy who instructed his leasing offices to not rent out apartments to black people?
Because certain types of people would rather set their community on fire before electing a woman. Make no mistake about it, if given the option to change their vote, I doubt many would.
Good news, some North Koreans aren't too fond of Kim
politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News