866
me_irl (discuss.online)
(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] t_berium@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago

This is exactly why we mainly get dogshit by people with nothing to say or any life experience.

[-] glitchdx@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

Sometimes, it's more important that you enjoy the thing than the thing being objectively good. There is merit to objectively analyzing things, and there can be enjoyment found in doing so. There is also merit to just enjoying the thing you like. Both are valid.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] twinnie@feddit.uk 7 points 2 days ago

Watch both Judge Dress films to understand the difference between a good film and a bad one.

[-] clay_pidgin@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 days ago

And they're both tremendously enjoyable.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] Owlboi@lemm.ee 4 points 2 days ago

i can enjoy a movie i think is objectively bad and vice versa.

[-] JackbyDev@programming.dev 2 points 2 days ago

Agreed. Especially with ritualistic movies like cult classics and holiday movies. The experience surrounding them is more important than the content.

[-] someguy3@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

Don't have fun = bad movie.

[-] Shardikprime@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

Dude just watch the room and you will get it

[-] copdeb@crazypeople.online 2 points 2 days ago

I get you bro

[-] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

The Room is considered a movie so bad it's good, but if it turned out that Tommy knew what he was doing the whole time, would that make it just a good movie?

[-] prowe45@lemm.ee 4 points 2 days ago

No, I don't think so. Whether it happened by accident or on purpose is a different measure, but the end result is the same, a movie that is so lacking in qualities that would normally be associated with a "good" movie that it is remarkable. I have heard of plenty of people that don't like it when movie makers intentionally try to make a movie that is "so bad it's good", but I've never heard anyone accuse those movies of being regular old "good".

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] JackbyDev@programming.dev 2 points 2 days ago

Honestly, that is what matters. There's something to be said about "cinema" versus "movies" lol, not everything needs to have mass appeal to be good, but I think a lot of people rate things high even when they hate it and that's bullshit.

[-] MudMan@fedia.io 4 points 2 days ago

I had this exact train of thought when I was eighteen and ended up building a career and a half on top of that particular crisis.

I was going to say no regrets, but... you know, some regrets?

I can tell when a movie is good now, though.

Weirdly, that somehow became a huge political problem on the Internet and ended up killing democracy. I guess that's one of the regrets.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] TriflingToad@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 days ago

I think the only movie rating a entirely agreed with was Thor: Ragnarok being awesome and Thor: love and thunder sucking ass.

Also the wakanda cat man movie was AWESOME.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 25 Jun 2025
866 points (100.0% liked)

me_irl

6322 readers
587 users here now

All posts need to have the same title: me_irl it is allowed to use an emoji instead of the underscore _

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS