I personally really enjoy how David and the skeletons either can't out won't elaborate on the parts of their whole thing that the people are confused about. There's just something funny to me about how it doesn't seem like they're intentionally being obtuse. They'll gladly answer the vague question of "and the skeletons are...?" with the equally vague "part of it!" with a big smile, as though it was a perfectly fine and helpful answer.

Hey Wayne, did you ever find Bugs Bunny attractive when he put on a dress and played a girl bunny?

I still legitimately didn't know what it means to not "be a feminist" with regards to sexual relations. Like, don't treat her as an equal, so be a selfish lover who doesn't care if she gets off as long as you do? Or more like the original post, don't concern yourself with "feminist" concepts like consent and just start having sex with her without asking her if she wants to? Just be a caveman who takes what he wants, when he wants it? I know that there are plenty of women who are into that sort of thing, so no kink shaming, I justed wanted to be sure I knew what we were actually talking about.

To give the original question answer slightly more (probably unfounded) credit, there are a lot of people out there who know the basics of what inflation is, but also seem to have a fundamental assumption that in a "normal" economy, wages will also increase at the same pace as inflation, resulting in a net zero effect on a person's buying power overall. Even though, yes, things are always getting a little more expensive in absolute terms, they don't seem more expensive. So the answer to the question someone with those assumptions might have actually been trying to ask is that even if inflation returns to a "normal" rate, wages have remained stagnant for a long time and aren't keeping pace with inflation like they used to, so now things actually are more expensive in a relative sense.

I agree with your overall message of discussing things in a non-toxic way, but I would also caution people against being the friend in the group who seems to dislike everything. I'm not directing this at you specifically, but what you said reminded me of how I used to be and of other people I've known, where taking the negative position on whatever is being discussed is just what came naturally. Even if you manage to not be toxic about it, it will still get old after a while. I didn't realize that's how I was coming across until one day a friend exasperatedly asked me why I had to be so negative all the time. There's bound to be plenty of things you can agree on liking with your friends or else it would be kind of weird for you to have become friends in the first place. For anyone else who tends to be the negative Nancy, I would recommend making a conscious effort to trade off between being the "for" and "against" side of your friend debates, so to speak.

All the Simpsons fans out there know how great Zinc is.

That doesn't make it any less true.

I just spotted my first in person yesterday and I agree completely. My kid said "It's shiny" and I said "Yeah, because the alternative to that is to be covered in rust".

Lucky we caught on before humans ate them to extinction. Scientists haven't always been so lucky.

That's "Lisa" performing the "I Want Candy" song as part of "The Simpson Family Smile-Time Variety Hour", which itself was part three of "The Simpsons Spin-Off Showcase" episode.

"What's happening to me? There's still food but I don't want to eat it. I've become everything I've ever hated."

Thankfully my dog only really interacts with other dogs at places that require vaccinations.