208
submitted 3 months ago by return2ozma@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
all 39 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] moodymellodrone@sopuli.xyz 46 points 3 months ago

This is a wake up call to the DNC

[-] miseducator@lemmy.world 49 points 3 months ago

DNC gonna keep hitting that snooze button to any and all wake-up calls.

[-] usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.ml 24 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

If they ignore it, the progressives are starting to get ready to take it in the primaries themselves. There's been an increase in young progressives running for state & local office following these results

Graph large spike in signups with text above saying "The dotted lines are the @runforsomething.net  candidate sign-ups today from runforwhat.net -- if you're interested, check out what you can run for in 2026."

(https://bsky.app/profile/amandalitman.bsky.social/post/3lsflzpcjlk2i)

[-] prole 5 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

What an awful graph... Looks completely made up.

If it isn't complete bullshit, they did a really bad job of making it appear legitimate in any way whatsoever.

[-] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

Not a presidential election. Or a senate election. Or even a house election.

A mayoral election.

And this should scare the DNC?

Baloney.

[-] usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.ml 21 points 3 months ago

They poured millions and million and massively outspent Zohran and still lost. Zohran had no name recognition, and was virtually a nobody in February. The establishment worked hard against him and still lost. They rolled out shameless endorsement of Cuomo after shameless endorsement (like Bill Clinton, apparently). The establishment didn't lose for a lack of effort. This could happen anywhere next

[-] ByteJunk@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago

Millions thrown away just so he can fold over.

The US PACs system is absolutely broken...

[-] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

Oh goody, one good thing could happen anywhere while a million bad things could happen a million times in a million places.

You’re not gonna trick me into having hope over one dumb mayoral election. We’re too fucked for that to make a difference.

[-] usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.ml 14 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Hope does not mean blind hope. It does not mean you will always win. It means knowing that you can

Always try. No matter how hopeless it seems, you always have the possibility to win a seemingly impossible fight. This a shining example of overcoming and winning big

Giving up is a guaranteed loss. That is what they want us to do. Never give in

[-] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

Politics is one of those claw games where they rig it to barely be able to win. Just enough that you keep shoving quarters into it, but not so much that you get something you actually want.

Except I’m forced to play and get berated when I say it’s a stupid game designed to frustrate you.

[-] Cocodapuf@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Fine, give up on hope universally. Just do it less vocally.

(That is to say, shut up)

[-] njm1314@lemmy.world 16 points 3 months ago

Mayor of the biggest city in the nation is pretty damn important. Higher population than half the states in the nation. Most governors are small potatoes in comparison.

[-] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Oh you mean like Rudy Giuliani? Mayor of the biggest city? The Mayor of America?

Unless we’re going to back to polities like the ancient Greeks NYC thinks too highly of itself.

[-] njm1314@lemmy.world 14 points 3 months ago

Yeah man. Giuliani was pretty damn influential for a while. Did you not notice that?

[-] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

He had influence because of a terrorist attack and being a dumb lickspittle to a con man with Russian mob contacts. New Yorkers hated Giuliani before it was cool.

I refuse to have hope.

[-] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 10 points 3 months ago

Ok, so go mope in a corner and stop posting, because you have nothing to add to the conversation.

[-] prole 3 points 3 months ago

I don't really understand what the point of bringing up Giuliani here is...?

[-] ByteJunk@lemmy.world 10 points 3 months ago

These are his policies:

rent freeze, making city buses free and raising taxes on the most wealthy

If this goes ahead in NY, you can be damn sure that it's going to stir the pot.

[-] prole 5 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Oh you mean like Rudy Giuliani? Mayor of the biggest city? The Mayor of America?

I mean, yes? What point do you think you're making here by bringing up someone who hasn't been mayor for nearly 30 years?

[-] cybervseas@lemmy.world 38 points 3 months ago

Please please please let this one good thing happen.

[-] magnetosphere@fedia.io 18 points 3 months ago

This won’t affect me directly, but I’ve been pulling for Mamdani anyway. I know that basically amounts to “thoughts and prayers”, but still.

[-] sylveon 4 points 3 months ago

Yeah same, I’m on another continent but it’s great to see good news out of America for once. I’m happy for New Yorkers!

[-] ViatorOmnium@piefed.social 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

If New Yorkers manage to elect a Mayor that's not a bootlicker it's a sign that everything has a chance to get better.

[-] magnetosphere@fedia.io 1 points 3 months ago

Yeah, that’s what I think, too.

[-] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

Don’t worry, even if it’s good now it won’t be good later for some dumb reason

[-] njm1314@lemmy.world 32 points 3 months ago

Democrats the people of this nation are screaming at you. Listen.

[-] WhiteRabbit@lemmy.today 23 points 3 months ago

Cuomo conceded. Mamdani won!!

[-] neukenindekeuken@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 months ago

Unless Cumo splits the vote by running as an independent in the election.

[-] manxu@piefed.social 20 points 3 months ago

So it's him against Eric Adams now. Shouldn't be all that hard, and I wish him the best.

Long time supporter of incremental change and centrist policies here. Saw the way the Democratic party crumbled to dust after the election, saw the way Schumer and Jeffries went AWOL. It's time for change. Not just generational, but also political, social, and philosophical.

Let Mamdani win, and let him turn New York into a better, more humane place.

[-] prole 5 points 3 months ago

Cuomo still might run as an independent, and the DNC might back him given how terrified they are of someone like Mamdani

[-] wanderwisley@lemm.ee 16 points 3 months ago

Please let this be the snowball that causes an avalanche of change in our country.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago

I can't wait to see what centrists are going to do instead of voting blue no matter who.

[-] solrize@lemmy.ml 7 points 3 months ago

No idea who Mamdani is but they are sure to blame ranked-choice voting and keep trying to get it banned.

[-] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 2 points 3 months ago
[-] ViatorOmnium@piefed.social 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Cuomo's speech seemed to go more into the direction of sitting this one out and wait for a safer way to attempt a comeback.

He's probably going to do some polling but unless there's some big advantage for him in a realistic scenario, trying to run and risking losing can damage his political career beyond repair. And yes, on an ideal world it would already be dead beyond saving, but we have the world we have.

this post was submitted on 25 Jun 2025
208 points (100.0% liked)

News

32565 readers
2668 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS