For the techbrodude shills: this is called “allegory”. Maybe you can ask ChatGPT to explain it to you.)
This made me deeply sad that so many people are not literate enough to follow metaphor and allegory.
Illiterate, or maybe autistic and prone to reading things literally until someone mentions that it’s an allegory at which point it all snaps into place and makes sense.
A really good piece.
The author is on Fedi, so for anyone who'd like to directly share it that way here is the link.
My link is blue.
I feel like this is an allegory for something important, but I'm too dumb to suss it out.
The last lines two blue letters tell you what it’s about, it’s about AI being inlcluded in everything
Pay attention to the words that are bolded and highlighted.
Or the tags at the end of the piece.
Or the Lemmy community into which this post was posted.
I already said I'm dumb, damn.
Nah, you're good! It happens to us all. 👉😎👉
Speak for yourself! It never happens to me here on c/Enough Musk Spam!
I don't think this is really a very good allegory. The author has written 835 words and only managed to express that:
It's not surprising to me that some people didn't get that it was about AI.
The allegory would work better if:
To make these points, I think the metaphor needs to be something a little bit more complex than "blue food colouring." Perhaps food made by a food replicator would make for a better example.
An argument doesn't have to be all-encompassing to be effective. This is arguing against the enshittification caused by and unavoidability of AI for the average end user. It doesn't have to list everything wrong with AI for that to be valid.
In this case, it's just preaching to the choir. The purpose of an allegory is usually to present a convincing argument to people who are as yet unconvinced, by presenting the argument from a different point of view that they haven't considered.
food made by a food replicator
Did you mean: something that is outside of the possibilities of modern technology and is thus far enough from reality to be easily dismissed as irrelevant and not relatable?
Edit: not to mention, food colouring has no purpose (other than ooh shiny), whereas food replicators would solve SO MANY PROBLEMS.
I don't think this is really a very good allegory.
Thank you for sharing your opinion.
The allegory would work better if:
No really. Thank you for sharing your opinion.
nobody cares bro
extremely nitpicky gripe, but making leaves and flowers blue using food colouring was something I actually did, in kindergarten, so the line about "not being able to make the leaves blue" threw me off. it's a hell of a lot easier than making meat blue. plus, plants were traditionally a source of blue dye.
also, House of Leaves, anyone?
"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"
A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.