58
submitted 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) by o7___o7@awful.systems to c/techtakes@awful.systems

This is peak laziness. It seems that the reading list's author used autoplag to extrude the entire 60 page supplemental insert. The author also super-promises this has never happened before.

top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] tenchiken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 day ago

Ahem....

Cough cough

BWAHAHAHAHaaAaaaa

[-] paraphrand@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

AI assistants such as ChatGPT are well-known for creating plausible-sounding errors known as confabulations especially when lacking detailed information on a particular topic.

No, they are hallucinations or bullshit. I won’t accept any other terms.

[-] o7___o7@awful.systems 11 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

If it makes you feel better, I've heard good folks like Emily Bender of Stochastic Parrots fame suggest confabulation is a better term. "Hallucination" implies that LLMs have qualia and are accidentally sprinkling falsehoods over a true story. Confabulation better illustrates that it's producing a bullshit milkshake from its training data that can only be correct accidentally.

[-] paraphrand@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

You’ve swayed me. I’m now down with all three. Thanks for the explaination.

[-] HedyL@awful.systems 9 points 1 day ago

As all the book authors on the list were apparently real, I guess the "author" of this supplemental insert remembered to google their names and to remove all references to fake books from fake authors made up by AI, but couldn't be bothered to do the same with the book titles (too much work for too little money, I suppose?). And for an author to actually read these books before putting them on a list is probably too much to ask for...

It's also funny how some people seem to justify this by saying that the article is just “filler material” around ads. I don't know, but I believe most people don't buy printed newspapers in order to read nonsensical “filler material” garnished with advertising. The use of AI is a big problem in this case, but not the only one.

[-] eksb@programming.dev 8 points 1 day ago

Several people should be fired for this.

[-] bruhbeans@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 day ago

The Sun-Times staff has already been downsized, seems plausible that the layoffs could have contributed to publishing the article by mistake. https://www.wbez.org/business/2025/03/18/chicago-sun-times-lose-20-staff-buyout-offer

[-] o7___o7@awful.systems 5 points 1 day ago

It's soooo bad. Could it be a cry for help?

[-] Soyweiser@awful.systems 2 points 11 hours ago

No, the guy who did it non-apologized, by going he should have checked the output better. Still an AI user.

this post was submitted on 20 May 2025
58 points (100.0% liked)

TechTakes

1870 readers
159 users here now

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here's the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS