591
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] MMEnterprises@lemm.ee 15 points 1 day ago

Thank goodness my second child isn’t due today.

[-] wanderwisley@lemm.ee 17 points 1 day ago

I’m 42 and I’ve been told this like every 5 years or so.

[-] Uranus_Hz@lemm.ee 33 points 1 day ago

And have you not seen things heading in that direction? I’m 57 and I sure as hell have.

[-] wanderwisley@lemm.ee 15 points 1 day ago

Oh yes definitely I’ve seen it slowly going from bad to worse, I guess i meant to say that I’m tired and exhausted from it. And from no one in power actually wanting to do anything about fixing it.

[-] Fredthefishlord 7 points 1 day ago

Fun fact! The people who control who is in power!

The people don't want change. They want their luxury, their excess. Even at the cost of the world.

[-] Uranus_Hz@lemm.ee 7 points 1 day ago

Bernie Sanders has been screaming consistently about it for decades.

[-] iglou@programming.dev 1 points 1 day ago

That's on the people to vote for people who actually care.

Green parties rarely win, and that's on us.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Professorozone@lemmy.world 24 points 1 day ago

This is actually optimistic. They think kids are going to grow up.

[-] Uranus_Hz@lemm.ee 6 points 1 day ago

They think people these days can afford to have kids.

[-] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 26 points 1 day ago

It's gonna be awesome when we're old and need end of life care and the younger generations are too poor to help us and too stupid to help us even if they weren't poor.

We're headed into a very, very stupid and depressing future. And it's 100% avoidable.

[-] lickmygiggle@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Welcome to COSCO, I love you.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Zenith@lemm.ee 113 points 2 days ago

Millennials been saying this since we were teens but were told to shut up and sit down

It’s why I’m not having kids tbh

[-] tamal3@lemmy.world 21 points 2 days ago

And we did...

[-] whoisearth@lemmy.ca 17 points 2 days ago

GenX been hammered this since we were kids ain't nothing changing because we are all addicted to this course we are on including you and your generation.

The sooner we all admit it's our habits that have collectively caused this the sooner we solve it but we all know that shit isn't gonna happen so here we are. I feel sorry for my kids and hope one day it gets bad enough that we all agree to change it.

[-] Vytle@lemmy.world 44 points 2 days ago

Do not blame private citizens for the actions taken by large corporations and governments agencies.

[-] null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 2 days ago

There's plenty of blame to go around.

Private citizens are supporting shitty companies and electing shitty governments.

[-] HellsBelle@sh.itjust.works 15 points 2 days ago

When there are only two shitty options to choose from, picking the least shitty option doesn't mean they were the 'good' one.

[-] copd@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

issue is some countries and areas have viable affordable alternatives to planet destroying lifestyle habits, but people still chose to destroy the planet

[-] spooky2092 26 points 2 days ago

The sooner we all admit it's our habits that have collectively caused this the sooner we solve it but we all know that shit isn't gonna happen so here we are. I

Can we acknowledge that most consumer habits are directly driven by the media and large corporations influencing people through news and advertising? Or that corporations have done their best to offload the responsibility for polluting the biosphere onto consumers, even as they knowingly peddled products that had direct damage to ecosystems and pushed habits that did nothing but make consumers feel better about the shitty products they consume (see plastic recycling).

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Allonzee@lemmy.world 36 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

And we're STILL not willing to reign in capitalism.

We doomed ourselves. My pity is reserved for all the species we're taking with us in this murder/suicide for short term profit for the avarice diseased. Those capitalists are by far most to blame, but no one that contributes to the capitalist machine, myself included, is without blame for the effectively permanent destruction of our COMMUNal habitat.

Unless you're an eco-terrorist who has been actively trying to destroy the capitalist machine, the precious few good guys as far as I'm concerned if your goal is a viable habitat for our species at all beyond the next couple decades, we've all been seeing this oncomming train heading towards us our entire lives and done nothing of note.

We can't keep living like we've been living, as gluttonous consumers with 78 kinds of plastic packaged cereal made a thousand miles away in any form AND survive as a species, and it's clear which choice we've made. We aren't willing to live closer to the land, to farm the food our community eats, to live small lives understanding we are subject to earth and not the other way around, so we gotta go so life can go on without us.

[-] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

Humans are pretty resilient. I don't think we're going to go extinct, unless we do the nuclear winter thing, which I personally believe is inevitable on a long enough timeline. Short of that, we'll see mass death and an extreme decline in quality of life, but we'll probably, unfortunately, continue on as a species. Either way, we'll end up destroying this planet eventually. We simply cannot exist in symbiosis with nature.

I'm not really on the fence about the bright vs dark future thing anymore, as you can see by my name. It's pretty much guaranteed we've chosen the dark future option.

[-] Soggy@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago

Blah blah ecofascist doomerism. We can live harmonically with nature and have for most of our history. Our current consumerist society isn't compatible with sustainable and responsible practices but that isn't a forgone conclusion or intrinsic to human behavior. That's not to say that we aren't on a bad path, we absolutely are and a great many organisms are going extinct because of us, but ascribing a moral value to our very existence is the wrong move.

[-] sadTruth@lemmy.hogru.ch 2 points 1 day ago

Not true. Humans always reproduced to the absolute limit (set by their agricultural technology and the bodies of women). The reason why this didn't wreck the environment is because that limited population was too small to turn 50% of land into farmland, they didn't know how to burn large amounts of coal and they didn't have the technology to produce harmful chemicals.

But i agree that humanity (or any other species) has no value. Saying humanity has value is like saying the white race has value. It's pure aestethics, it's not worth it to make anyone suffer for that.

[-] bishbosh@lemm.ee 1 points 17 hours ago

Humans always reproduced to the absolute limit

My understanding is that this is not true. The big factor seems to be infant mortality, as that drops so does the average number of children per breeding pair.

[-] sadTruth@lemmy.hogru.ch 1 points 3 hours ago

Turns out you are right. At least on the surface.

But if we dig deeper, we find that only 10% of children made it to their 20s, and the reason for that was famine and disease.
So those that kept the population growing lived under conditions where the reason why their children died was because they could not feed them or keep them healthy. And if we take the 0.5% of maternal mortality, and apply it to those responsible for the population growth (those that made it into their 20s), we get a rough estimate of 50% effective maternal mortality. So it was the agricultural technology in combination with war, disease and child birth that kept the population low.

And that's what i meant: They lived in a situation where 80-90% of their friends had died of famine, disease and war, and under these horrific conditions they still produced 4.5 to 7.5 children per woman, which kept the population growing (slowly). As soon as that limitation was lifted, the population shot up.

Personally, i don't see any planning in that. They just had as many children as they could before they died, not worrying about how they would feed them.

[-] EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com 96 points 2 days ago

Stop having kids. No, it won't prevent the climate from going to shit. Yes, it will prevent you from creating new victims.

[-] sadTruth@lemmy.hogru.ch 2 points 1 day ago

The only thing Evil (aka. suffering, disease, war,...) needs to exist is that 'good' people continue to have children.

[-] merdaverse@lemmy.world 27 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

But... but... who will grow the economy so we can get the first trillionaire? Humanity has never existed with less than 2 billion people. Suggesting that lower than replacement birth rates are possible is eco fascist!!1 /s

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago

YES WE FUCKING KNOW

[-] frigidaphelion@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

So uh what do I call what we are living in right now?

[-] Gormadt 12 points 1 day ago

The calm before the storm.

What we've got now is peanuts compared to what kind of future we're looking towards.

yay.

[-] Naevermix@lemmy.world 27 points 2 days ago

Umm actually this is just woke and we should have more children for racist reasons /s

[-] creamlike504@jlai.lu 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

In an analysis of human exposure to climate change extremes — such as heatwaves, floods, droughts, wildfires, cyclones and crop failures — researchers found that children born in 2020 are two to seven times more likely to face one-in-10,000 year events than those who were born in 1960.

Why pick (great) grandparents as the reference point?

Wouldn't it be more practical to compare them with their parents?

Edit: the actual study does show comparative data for other cohorts (i.e. every decade since 1960). Unless the average LiveScience reader is in their 60s, they just picked a weirdly unrelatable way to describe the study.

[-] Halcyon@discuss.tchncs.de 28 points 2 days ago

We will have to teach that there are five seasons now: spring, summer, inferno, autumn and winter.

[-] Birch@sh.itjust.works 27 points 2 days ago

Storm, Flood, Heatwave, Fire, Dust, Blizzard

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today 13 points 1 day ago

Don't worry, they are not growing up

[-] Teppichbrand@feddit.org 8 points 1 day ago

Stop eating animals! Proof that you care and commit to change a destructive habit.

[-] lickmygiggle@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

I’ll do that if you remove every part of your life that touches anything even remotely having to do with oil.

[-] Teppichbrand@feddit.org 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I try, but it is hard! Eating lentils instead of animal tissue for protein is very easy. Putting soy milk in your porridge instead of udder milk is very easy. You just buy a product that tastes slightly different next time you go shopping. BÄM! ⅔ less co2 emissions, water pollution and land use from your meal. Well done! It's the single most powerful thing you can do effortlessly by yourself.

[-] lickmygiggle@lemmy.world 1 points 23 hours ago

My point is more that this is like someone arguing that a person should stop spilling their drink of the floor of the titanic while it’s sinking.

[-] Teppichbrand@feddit.org 1 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

This doomer attitude will get us nowhere, it drags everyone into apathy and indifference. Your politicians like you like that. But every decimal warming counts. Please give meaning to your existence and stand for something. Not because your impact is so great, but because it's the right thing to do. Don't just roll on your back and give up just because you like cheese too much.

[-] lickmygiggle@lemmy.world 1 points 10 hours ago

Just like all the companies that told us we need to recycle more rather than they having to change anything they were doing. You’ve got an agenda, that’s fine but maybe be a little more circumspect in delivering it.

[-] Teppichbrand@feddit.org 1 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

Oh I want corporations to pay for what they do to us and our childrens lifes! And I agree recycling is (mostly) a scam. But stop eating animals is not a distraction from systemic change, it fuels it. Animal Agriculture is a vile industry build on exploitation and destruction, the evidence is only a click away if you dare to look at it. And you, Lobotomo, pay this industry daily to keep going. Destroying ecosystems, polluting communities, exploiting workers, killing sentient being by the billions. You could exclude your family from this today, but you deliberately choose not to. I'm asking you to take the most obvious babystep out of the global suicide machine. It's a big FUCK YOU to Corporate Farming as well and everybody likes that. :)
I know it's not the solution, I'm not an idiot. Please keep fighting, you can do both! But no solution will be enough without us changing what we eat.

[-] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago

Why pick something super difficult?

[-] Gates9@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 day ago

We are the extinction event

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 15 May 2025
591 points (100.0% liked)

News

29393 readers
2528 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS