596
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Zenith@lemm.ee 115 points 1 year ago

Millennials been saying this since we were teens but were told to shut up and sit down

[-] tamal3@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago

And we did...

[-] whoisearth@lemmy.ca 17 points 1 year ago

GenX been hammered this since we were kids ain't nothing changing because we are all addicted to this course we are on including you and your generation.

The sooner we all admit it's our habits that have collectively caused this the sooner we solve it but we all know that shit isn't gonna happen so here we are. I feel sorry for my kids and hope one day it gets bad enough that we all agree to change it.

[-] Vytle@lemmy.world 44 points 1 year ago

Do not blame private citizens for the actions taken by large corporations and governments agencies.

[-] null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 1 year ago

There's plenty of blame to go around.

Private citizens are supporting shitty companies and electing shitty governments.

[-] HellsBelle@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 year ago

When there are only two shitty options to choose from, picking the least shitty option doesn't mean they were the 'good' one.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] spooky2092 26 points 1 year ago

The sooner we all admit it's our habits that have collectively caused this the sooner we solve it but we all know that shit isn't gonna happen so here we are. I

Can we acknowledge that most consumer habits are directly driven by the media and large corporations influencing people through news and advertising? Or that corporations have done their best to offload the responsibility for polluting the biosphere onto consumers, even as they knowingly peddled products that had direct damage to ecosystems and pushed habits that did nothing but make consumers feel better about the shitty products they consume (see plastic recycling).

[-] Jhex@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

Sorry but no. Many understand and hate this path yet there is little choice when the alternati-e is homelessness, starvation and/or jail

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com 98 points 1 year ago

Stop having kids. No, it won't prevent the climate from going to shit. Yes, it will prevent you from creating new victims.

[-] merdaverse@lemmy.world 27 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

But... but... who will grow the economy so we can get the first trillionaire? Humanity has never existed with less than 2 billion people. Suggesting that lower than replacement birth rates are possible is eco fascist!!1 /s

[-] j0ester@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

But.. but… in US, you get a whole $5,000 usd hehe

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ArmoredThirteen@lemmy.zip 40 points 1 year ago

There's so many reasons I'm not having kids. My brother on the other hand is having kids with half the state of Idaho. I'll do what I can for my niblings but I don't have enough damage control to go around

[-] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 36 points 1 year ago

It's half the state of Idaho, Michael. What could it be, 10 women?

[-] Allonzee@lemmy.world 37 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

And we're STILL not willing to reign in capitalism.

We doomed ourselves. My pity is reserved for all the species we're taking with us in this murder/suicide for short term profit for the avarice diseased. Those capitalists are by far most to blame, but no one that contributes to the capitalist machine, myself included, is without blame for the effectively permanent destruction of our COMMUNal habitat.

Unless you're an eco-terrorist who has been actively trying to destroy the capitalist machine, the precious few good guys as far as I'm concerned if your goal is a viable habitat for our species at all beyond the next couple decades, we've all been seeing this oncomming train heading towards us our entire lives and done nothing of note.

We can't keep living like we've been living, as gluttonous consumers with 78 kinds of plastic packaged cereal made a thousand miles away in any form AND survive as a species, and it's clear which choice we've made. We aren't willing to live closer to the land, to farm the food our community eats, to live small lives understanding we are subject to earth and not the other way around, so we gotta go so life can go on without us.

[-] Halcyon@discuss.tchncs.de 28 points 1 year ago

We will have to teach that there are five seasons now: spring, summer, inferno, autumn and winter.

[-] Birch@sh.itjust.works 27 points 1 year ago

Storm, Flood, Heatwave, Fire, Dust, Blizzard

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Naevermix@lemmy.world 27 points 1 year ago

Umm actually this is just woke and we should have more children for racist reasons /s

[-] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 27 points 1 year ago

It's gonna be awesome when we're old and need end of life care and the younger generations are too poor to help us and too stupid to help us even if they weren't poor.

We're headed into a very, very stupid and depressing future. And it's 100% avoidable.

[-] lickmygiggle@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Welcome to COSCO, I love you.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 25 points 1 year ago

And people say I'm somehow selfish or pathetic for not wanting to give any possible kids an undue burden, even assuming they are a white cis-male able-bodied person, the exact thing a fascist wants in this nation.

It's just foolish or genuinely spiteful to have kids in this time. Even if you can give them a good childhood, healthy, happy, nothing wrong with em at all, you can't fix the climate.

[-] null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 1 year ago

I've never thought that anyone was selfish or pathetic for choosing not to have kids, but it's odd to suggest that it's foolish or spiteful to have kids now.

Kids now will face climate change, but their lives will be better than the vast majority of their ancestors. Imagine if your ancestors decided not to have children because they were worried about food insecurity or warring tribes or sabre-toothed tigers.

load more comments (12 replies)
[-] Professorozone@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago

This is actually optimistic. They think kids are going to grow up.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] MyOpinion@lemm.ee 24 points 1 year ago

Thank you MAGATs for destroying our country and the world.

[-] NewDark@lemmings.world 35 points 1 year ago

It's capitalism.

Oil companies have known about this shit since the 70s and there's been billions spent to manufacture your consent, keep the current power structures, and prevent change. Both parties maintain that status quo, don't forget that.

[-] Zero22xx 29 points 1 year ago

Not just MAGAs, this is on the whole world. I feel like they've been talking about and warning about global warming for all 39 years of my life now and most of these clown nations still have vague targets set for 2030, 2040 etc. Head clown Trump might be helping speed it up now but no one has approached this with any particular urgency. Our world leaders are just as effective at fighting climate change as they've been fighting misinformation on Twitter and Facebook.

I personally think that if there is a future where we write history books, our current crop of leaders in the world today are going to go down as the absolute worst and most useless sacks of shit, that sold out their people to both fascism and climate change.

[-] EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com 9 points 1 year ago

This would have happened with or without them. They introduced other problems, but we were already headed to climate collapse before this year.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Scott_of_the_Arctic@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago

Lol, not mine. Good fucking luck to you chumps living below the arctic circle though!

[-] SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

No your kids will get anthrax and all the viruses that are now stuck in the permafrost and will revive once they are thawed.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] wanderwisley@lemm.ee 17 points 1 year ago

I’m 42 and I’ve been told this like every 5 years or so.

[-] Uranus_Hz@lemm.ee 33 points 1 year ago

And have you not seen things heading in that direction? I’m 57 and I sure as hell have.

[-] wanderwisley@lemm.ee 16 points 1 year ago

Oh yes definitely I’ve seen it slowly going from bad to worse, I guess i meant to say that I’m tired and exhausted from it. And from no one in power actually wanting to do anything about fixing it.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today 13 points 1 year ago

Don't worry, they are not growing up

[-] SpicyLizards@reddthat.com 12 points 1 year ago

The researchers note that their study is far from complete — they didn’t model climate change’s impacts on fertility, mortality or migration. This means that the effects of climate change in sparking mass migrations and resource wars were not accounted for in their analysis, and neither were the various tipping points our warming world is edging closer toward.

[-] Gates9@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 year ago

We are the extinction event

[-] creamlike504@jlai.lu 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

In an analysis of human exposure to climate change extremes — such as heatwaves, floods, droughts, wildfires, cyclones and crop failures — researchers found that children born in 2020 are two to seven times more likely to face one-in-10,000 year events than those who were born in 1960.

Why pick (great) grandparents as the reference point?

Wouldn't it be more practical to compare them with their parents?

Edit: the actual study does show comparative data for other cohorts (i.e. every decade since 1960). Unless the average LiveScience reader is in their 60s, they just picked a weirdly unrelatable way to describe the study.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 15 May 2025
596 points (100.0% liked)

News

37999 readers
1556 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS