893

Doesn't even know the presidential oath he pledged.

You proud now MAGAts? Does this make you proud?

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] DaddleDew@lemmy.world 185 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

"I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States."

This is the oath he had to make when he took office.

[-] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 69 points 2 months ago

Right, but was he lying when he said it? He's not sure.

[-] capt_wolf@lemmy.world 33 points 2 months ago

He had his fingers crossed...

[-] Hideakikarate@sh.itjust.works 14 points 2 months ago

If I recall, he didn't even place a hand on the Bible.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 35 points 2 months ago

You think he was awake for that part?

[-] JailElonMusk@sopuli.xyz 11 points 2 months ago

Obviously he was being "sarcastic" during that too.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Boddhisatva@lemmy.world 131 points 2 months ago

Pressed whether his administration is following the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution, which says no person "shall be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law," Trump said he wasn't sure.

"I don't know. It seems – it might say that, but if you're talking about that, then we'd have to have a million or 2 million or 3 million trials," he said. "We have thousands of people that are some murderers and some drug dealers and some of the worst people on Earth."

It might say that? Might? This isn't something that is debatable you hippopotamic dung heap. That's what it fucking says.

[-] PlantJam@lemmy.world 42 points 2 months ago

"Well yeah it says that but it'd be pretty inconvenient, so..."

[-] nieminen@lemmy.world 20 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Thank you for the new word!

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Tarquinn2049@lemmy.world 15 points 2 months ago

Yeah, 3 million trials to catch the thousands of criminals in his own words... or maybe instead of trials first, they could maybe only be rounded up if there is any actual reason to believe they are a criminal in the first place. Then it would only be thousands of trials and all the problems being caused by rounding up 900+ innocent people per 1 criminal, would all of a sudden go away.

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 115 points 2 months ago

You proud now MAGAts? Does this make you proud?

They don't care. All they care about is their in-group is strong and the out-group is punished. They're shitty people.

[-] Newsteinleo@infosec.pub 39 points 2 months ago

I saw a guy today with two bumper stickers. One said "Trump" the other said "I love the constitution". I wonder what he would say about this?

[-] wagesj45@fedia.io 43 points 2 months ago

Nonsense. He would say nonsense. Because they don't care. They care as much about sounding serious as they do about other people.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] wolframhydroxide@sh.itjust.works 17 points 2 months ago

I'm sure he'd be very upset if he could read.

[-] Lightsong@lemmy.world 15 points 2 months ago

They don't really love The Constitution. They only like the first two.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] redlemace@lemmy.world 65 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

"don't know" ?? isn't that like the first thing in his job description?

[-] nkat2112@sh.itjust.works 33 points 2 months ago

Yes. In fact, you couldn't be more correct about the matter.

I would describe his response to the question as fully preposterous.

[-] nokturne213@sopuli.xyz 16 points 2 months ago

I would describe it as a dereliction of duty.

[-] SinningStromgald@lemmy.world 15 points 2 months ago

If Biden said that the headline would be "Sleepy Dementia Joe Biden Doesn't Remember Oath of Office He Took Three Months Ago". It would be brought up in every segment on every news station for weeks. Trump says it and the news is like "That's kinda weird... Anyways, wonder what Elon is doing..."

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Freshparsnip@lemm.ee 56 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

WHY IS THIS SHIT ALLOWED! THIS MAN SHOULD NOT BE ALLOWED IN ANY RESPONSIBLE POSITION! HE SHOULDN'T BE IN CHARGE OF A LEMONADE STAND MUCH LESS A COUNTRY! WHY DID AMERICA ALLOW THIS TO HAPPEN! THE MAN DOESN'T WANT TO DO HIS JOB OF UPHOLDING THE CONSITUTION! THAT'S LIKE A DOCTOR SAYING THEY DON'T KNOW IF THEY HAVE TO ABIDE BY THE HIPPOCRATIC OATH! TRUMP AND ALL OF THE REPUBLICANS IN CONGRESS NEED TO BE TRIED FOR TREASON! WHY HAS THIS MADNESS GONE ON SO LONG!

[-] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 11 points 2 months ago

THERE IS NO ADULT WAITING IN THE WINGS TO SWOOP IN AND SAVE YOUR NATION! BE THE CHANGE YOU WANT TO SEE! THE REASON NO ONE IS STOPPING THIS IS EVERYONE IS BUSY ASKING "WHY IS THIS SHIT ALLOWED!"!

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[-] Sunflier@lemmy.world 55 points 2 months ago

I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.

-President Trump, just this year.

[-] SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de 39 points 2 months ago

"to the best of my abilities" is the loophole here

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] SereneSadie@lemmy.myserv.one 53 points 2 months ago

This what you get, no-vote cowards.

[-] redhat421@lemmy.world 12 points 2 months ago

I'm mad at the Democrats for under signing a genocide thus disaffecting their would be voters.

[-] pupbiru@aussie.zone 38 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

the world is not binary. there are many people who bare part of the responsibility:

  • the republican party - all of them
  • republican voters
  • the democratic party
  • no-voters (who didn’t want to “support genocide” and now you have a worse genocide and a bunch of other horrible shit including a shit load of extra war crimes in ukraine for the foreseeable future)
  • the media

these and many more can have played a part all at the same time

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] huppakee@lemm.ee 22 points 2 months ago

Ikr, so hard to blame the republicans and the people who didn't vote for the shit us is in rn /s

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] spaghettiwestern@sh.itjust.works 47 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

He doesn't know what the Declaration of Independence is — something that's taught all through grade and middle school in the U.S. The odds are he has no idea what that pesky Constitution says, nor does he care.

[-] takeda@lemm.ee 13 points 2 months ago

The only time when "love and unity" isn't the correct answer he uses it.

[-] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 37 points 2 months ago

It’s ok, he learned his lesson

-Susan Collins

[-] Zimroxo@lemm.ee 32 points 2 months ago

If this comment doesn't make the case for impeachment idk what does

Upholding the constitution is the most basic part of the job.

If he "doesn't know" if he can do that he is unfit for the position and should be removed immediately. Not even counting all the other violations of the constitution his administration has committed in just the first 100 days alone

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] cabron_offsets@lemmy.world 29 points 2 months ago

Traitor cunt.

[-] _stranger_@lemmy.world 25 points 2 months ago

Oh he literally forgot the oath of the presidency? Sounds like a good reason to invoke the 25th amendment.

[-] GuyFawkes@midwest.social 24 points 2 months ago

I’ve got it! Let’s wring our hands about this while we continue to do nothing. Wait until it’s too late, and THEN start to fight back. That’ll show ‘em!

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] ryrybang@lemmy.world 24 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

He does not. He's above any and all laws. I don't know why, but he his. The Constitution is meaningless to a king.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Lexam@lemmy.world 20 points 2 months ago

"I don't know" the defense of criminals and toddlers.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] suicidaleggroll@lemm.ee 19 points 2 months ago

To be fair, I don't know either. I mean he's supposed to, and he swore an oath to, but if nobody is going to enforce that then must he really? What happens if/when he doesn't?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] a_baby_duck@lemmy.world 17 points 2 months ago

I always go back to that early coronavirus briefing where a reporter questioned his authority to dictate state government lockdown policies and he just sat there stunned, repeating "when you're the president your authority is total because you have total authority, it's total..." It's been clear for years that this fucking guy never understood the job description, and rather than learning anything from experience, he's having it rewritten. The constitution isn't going to save us from that.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] aceshigh@lemmy.world 17 points 2 months ago

At this point I’m just curious how long this will go on. What would have to tilt for a group of politicians to overhaul his ass and the r’s supporting him?

[-] ijedi1234@sh.itjust.works 22 points 2 months ago

I believe it will continue until the politicians are scared of an angry mob kicking in their door.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] postmateDumbass@lemmy.world 17 points 2 months ago

Trump probably had his fingers crossed while he took the oath.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] 1995ToyotaCorolla@lemmy.world 14 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Turns out as long as they have ( R ) next to their name, the president can operate with all the integrity of a five year old trying to get out of cleaning their room

[-] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 2 months ago

Imagine celebrating a fascist swearing allegiance to a slavemasters pact.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civil_religion

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 04 May 2025
893 points (100.0% liked)

politics

24969 readers
2498 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS