298
submitted 10 months ago by return2ozma@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
all 40 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] DaddleDew@lemmy.world 234 points 10 months ago

Real reason: His "advisers" cashed out from shorting the stock market and bought stocks back.

[-] delgato@lemmy.world 123 points 10 months ago

Biggest stock surge since October 2008 too, reeks of market shorting. Wish I was rich and morally bankrupt enough to profit off this.

[-] stabby_cicada@slrpnk.net 23 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

The Trump family made at least $500 million pumping and dumping cryptocurrency. I guess they're tired of playing in the crypto sandbox and going for the big money now.

[-] Ledericas@lemm.ee 2 points 10 months ago

probably could go so far, until people catch onto crypto schemes.

[-] LemmyFeed@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 10 months ago

Who pays when a stock is shorted? Genuinely curious. Shorting stocks is like gambling right? Who is the house in this scenario?

[-] DaddleDew@lemmy.world 15 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

It absolutely is a gamble, a dangerous gamble. Essentially, when you short a stock, you "borrow" a stock from someone with the promise of giving it back at a certain time. You then sell it, wait for it to drop, then buy it back. You give it back, usually sharing some of the profits you've made with the person you've borrowed it from.

The problem with that is that if the stock goes up while you've borrowed it, you need to buy it back at the deadline of the deal at the price it happens to be at. Unlike normal stock trading where you can only lose up to the money you've invested, there is no limit to how much money you can end up losing shorting stocks if things don't go the way you expected. This is how the whole GameStop stock shorting debacle happened.

[-] Revan343@lemmy.ca 2 points 10 months ago

When shorting stocks, a stock is borrowed, and then sold. Whoever they borrowed the stock from is the loser here

[-] howrar@lemmy.ca 5 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

The person you borrow from gets a small guaranteed win because you get paid a small amount for the privilege of borrowing their shares. The one who loses is whoever bought the shares at the higher price. That can be the person borrowing the shares, or it can be another person interacting with the stock market at the other end of your transaction.

[-] andyburke@fedia.io 96 points 10 months ago

"To calm the markets, I have again, without any warning or clear reasoning, changed my mind based on the random feedback that has reached me."

[-] phoenixarise@lemmy.world 74 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Hahaha “yippy”. What a tool.

So what, is he just going to keep declaring tariffs then pausing them every 90 days? Ridiculous.

[-] roguetrick@lemmy.world 66 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

He's not going to wait even 90 days before he starts playing this game again. It'll only take until he sees himself being portrayed as weak for backing off on some fucking cable news opinion spot. I don't even give it a week.

[-] floofloof@lemmy.ca 32 points 10 months ago

I hope the other countries of the world are still working out how to avoid trading with the USA until Trump has gone. The only thing he has established is that the USA is no longer a reliable trade partner.

[-] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 6 points 10 months ago

Or trading with individual states while circumnavigating the feds, thisll help keep them from manipulating the market as easily while directly fucking over federal control.

[-] vonbaronhans@midwest.social 5 points 10 months ago
[-] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 7 points 10 months ago

Legally fuck no, but my family has a saying "It ain't illegal if the Sheriff is involent" fact of the matter is that if the feds can't enforce their authority it ceases to exist. Frankly speaking it's also the duty of the states to ignore the feds and even outright defy them when the federal government hurts the states population.

[-] vonbaronhans@midwest.social 4 points 10 months ago

Yeah I guess I just meant like... logistically?

Ports of entry don't move, and shipping containers are huge. I'm probably just not thinking flexible enough.

[-] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 3 points 10 months ago

The feds are heavily reliant on state support and everyone turning in their paperwork, on top of that if memory serves right it's the IRS who handles most of that which means they probably don't have the man power to actually investigate what's going on. Fact of the matter is the feds are almost completely propped up by a handful of states, this means that the second those states just stop helping federal power will start to evaporate.

[-] Ledericas@lemm.ee 3 points 10 months ago

not like the feds were useful anyways, especiall trump has replaced most of them.

[-] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 2 points 10 months ago

Yep fuckem.

[-] vonbaronhans@midwest.social 2 points 10 months ago

Ooooooh. Interesting. Thanks for sharing!

[-] pivot_root@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago

It'll only take until he sees himself being portrayed as weak for backing off on some fucking cable news opinion spot.

I would prefer that they hurry up with it. With the unbelievably short attention span and memory of his voterbase, 90 days is about 87 too late for them to be able to correlate their support of him with any financial consequences that personally affect them.

[-] wirebeads@lemmy.ca 50 points 10 months ago

Seriously? Even the penguins are getting a tariff pause? Lazy do nothing no good penguins living off of the American ~~debt~~ dream. Shame.

[-] Stamau123@lemmy.world 18 points 10 months ago
[-] JuxtaposedJaguar@lemmy.ml 39 points 10 months ago

Thank you daddy Trump for temporarily slowing down the financial disaster you caused. I barely even remember that the economic wars you started were completely unnecessary and counter-productive.

[-] aeronmelon@lemmy.world 33 points 10 months ago
[-] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 2 points 10 months ago

Finally, a name for the new political party.

[-] Tungsten5@lemm.ee 14 points 10 months ago

So he blames us for his plan not working (or worked as intended…)?

[-] InputZero@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

Because clearly the only problem with Trump's master plan is that the people aren't pulling their weight. If they would only listen then things would work out. /S

[-] JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works 13 points 10 months ago

This is what backing down after overplaying your hand looks like. It's good to know that be US can't take on the rest of the world at once in a trade war.

[-] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

They are just paused for the moment, the claim was to allow negotiations, so I'm really wondering what those penguins are going to bring to the discussion. I'm faily sure the are going to just keep living their lives unaware of Trump's existence. And the supporters will call that a win. DOGE will likely say we saved $50 billion dollars off never talking to or exchanging any goods with the penguins. And MAGA will cheer about all the money that never existed not transferring to their pockets.

[-] OldChicoAle@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago

That's not the reason. People being yippy never stopped him before.

[-] uberdroog@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago

Because he is an idiot, surrounded by idiots.

[-] KeenFlame@feddit.nu 6 points 10 months ago

USE GROWN UP WORDS THAT ARE IN THE LEXICON PLEADE

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

I'm assuming it comes from golf - when someone gets the yips?

[-] peaceful_world_view@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago

Yippee Ki Yay mother Fucker!

[-] MyOpinion@lemm.ee 3 points 10 months ago

These damn yippys! The glorious market crash must wait.

this post was submitted on 09 Apr 2025
298 points (100.0% liked)

News

36201 readers
2225 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS