769
submitted 1 week ago by silence7@slrpnk.net to c/climate@slrpnk.net

Access options:

Yes, this means a ton of carbon ends up in the atmosphere instead of in the trees. The right move would be thinning and prescribed burns, but this administration isn't going to do that.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] njm1314@lemmy.world 244 points 1 week ago

These are our forests. They belong to the US people. They're being stolen from us. For private profit of a few.

[-] Klear@sh.itjust.works 65 points 1 week ago

It's an American tradition.

[-] Fluke@lemm.ee 21 points 1 week ago

I mean, as the other guy pointed out, you as a people stole the fucking lot and literally massacred thousands upon thousands of people to do it.

Shoe's on the other foot now, eh?

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Bloomcole@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago

You stole that whole country

[-] Butterpaderp@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago

"They're gonna chop down national forests"

"bUt WhAT aBoUt ThE iNdIaNs???"

bruh

load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Hello_there@fedia.io 151 points 1 week ago

Fuck. This kind of shit is why I feel the need for revenge on these people. They're slashing forests and impoverishing the population. It's not enough for them to lose an election. they need to pay

[-] MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml 85 points 1 week ago

Uhm, why can he just decide this? Not part of his expertise or departement.

[-] johncandy1812@lemmy.ca 48 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Trump doesn't like that the US buys lumber from Canada. He's going to announce 34% tariffs on lumber from Canada in the next few days.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] suite403@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago

That our government has been reacting to his shit rather than controlling it is infuriating.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] PantanoPete@lemmy.zip 69 points 1 week ago

America is a dumpster fire lol, they have all these "checks and balances" but then one guy can just make all the trade policy and land use decisions by decree. What even is the point of their congress

[-] silence7@slrpnk.net 27 points 1 week ago

The problem is that Congress is controlled by people who are Trump sycophants — the Republican Party kicked out everybody who wasn't.

[-] untorquer@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

All governments at some level run on the honor system. When the whole government colludes to not honor the system, you get this.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] BarelyAdulting@midwest.social 52 points 1 week ago

We get 30% of our lumber from Canada. This is the inevitable consequence of shutting our borders to trade via tariffs - if these policies stick around for four years, sure, we may bring some manufacturing home at great immediate cost, but we'll also be bringing home the environmental burdens of manufacturing (the negative externalities) which we've been pushing onto other countries and ignoring for decades. In the meantime, other countries have started to learn how to handle those externalities, like China's big push for solar power. In America, we've got an idiot who is rolling back worker safety, health and environmental protections, the list goes on. So even if these tariffs worked, we're going to be living in a less healthy place, all in the name of jobs...

[-] grue@lemmy.world 46 points 1 week ago

This has nothing to do with the tariffs; even if those weren't happening Trump would be selling the trees off to his cronies anyway. It's a blatantly corrupt kleptocracy.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] brightandshinyobject@lemmy.world 41 points 1 week ago

The trees can't be harmed if the lorax is armed. You touch his trees, he aims for your knees.

[-] gibmiser@lemmy.world 40 points 1 week ago

Trump has two legs. Just sayin

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] FundMECFSResearch 36 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Trump is speedrunning to aim for the lowest biodiversity index in North America.

Maybe if we stop ridiculously subisidising corn everywhere, some that gets thrown away because we have way too much, we could replace a couple dozen sq km of corn fields with more sustainable agroforestry, and thereby massively increase our logging output, instead of yk, cutting down the last wildlife sanctuaries? Not holding my breath tho.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] mosscap@slrpnk.net 36 points 1 week ago

My body is not ready for the amount of alcohol and dancing I am going to force myself to take part in on the day this motherfucker dies and goes to hell.

Literally, the most destructive and evil human on the planet since Hitler. I can't wait until the worms get him. I kind of feel bad for them, but I guess it's part of the job.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Spacehooks@reddthat.com 34 points 1 week ago

Cutting down old growth Forrest take 50 years to repair the area after its stopped. What a mess.

[-] YesButActuallyMaybe@lemmy.ca 34 points 1 week ago

Way longer than that. What grows back is not old growth

[-] EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com 10 points 1 week ago

Yep, can't fix it in our lifetime

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Goodmorningsunshine@lemmy.world 33 points 1 week ago
[-] the_q@lemm.ee 12 points 1 week ago

I got a mod deletion the last time I said anything like this. Good luck and I fucking agree.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] yarr@feddit.nl 32 points 1 week ago

Finally, a good move by Trump. Those trees are taking up incredible amounts of water. This is water that could be used for more productive things, like being mixed with Kool-aid powder on a hot day. Moreover, the trees emit large amounts of oxygen, a dangerous corrosive gas. Don't listen to liberals -- tree hugging is a dangerous activity that can lead to abrasions from all the bark.

If there's anything I learned from Dr. Seuss' "The Lorax", logging can lead to impressive industrial and commercial activity and has no downsides.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Hux@lemmy.ml 27 points 1 week ago

One can make useful items out of wood.

Guillotines, for example…

[-] baggins@beehaw.org 11 points 1 week ago
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Knoxvomica@lemmy.ca 26 points 1 week ago

Holy shit, America, you are so fucked at this point.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] stormdahl@lemmy.world 25 points 1 week ago

That is just... Insane. Incredibly sad.

[-] frezik@midwest.social 23 points 1 week ago
[-] Eyedust@lemmy.dbzer0.com 22 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

RIP My first thought. Seems appropriate.

Just fyi, I'm pointing out Trump's similarities to an evil villain. I'm not using this to agree. I'm very much against this, having grown up in the woods (practically raised by my local forest, as my mother was an awful drunk and single parent) and I spent most of my youth walking through the peace and quiet of the trees.

I grew up with my mother seeing nothing but my father in me, and was abused for it. Those trees gave me the shelter I needed and I would have been 100x more a mess if I didn't have them. So no. Don't take my fucking trees en masse.

[-] GeeDubHayduke@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 1 week ago

Then i guess it's time to start living up to the old namesake.

load more comments (13 replies)
[-] pelicans_plight@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago

I predict that any company that participates in destroying the parks will end up even worse off then Tesla. I've been a hiker my whole life and I've met a lot of retired military on the trail.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] MrMakabar@slrpnk.net 13 points 1 week ago
[-] falkerie71@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 week ago

So I just want to chime in here as an outsider. From what I searched, national forests are different from national parks in that, extraction of natural resources from national forests is permitted for commercial and personal use.

Trump's order cites wildfire, insect and disease outbreak as the reason for this change (Biden also sought more logging to combat fire but apparently timber sales did not change much during his tenure). While I agree that forest management is important, Trump had also put tariffs on Canadian lumber and cut down jobs for national park workers. It's not hard to question if there are other motivations other than wildfire prevention in this context.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] Empricorn@feddit.nl 12 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Those are our national Forests, they don't belong to fascist billionaires like Trump and Musk! Resist, fight back, and let's tell these Nazis they can't strip our environment, government, healthcare and democracy to give tax breaks to rich people...

[-] jaemo@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 week ago

Gee, why wouldn't I want to cede my country to American management and become the 51st state? You guys are knocking it out of the park, no pun intended.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 06 Apr 2025
769 points (100.0% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

6404 readers
432 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS