770
submitted 2 weeks ago by silence7@slrpnk.net to c/climate@slrpnk.net

Access options:

Yes, this means a ton of carbon ends up in the atmosphere instead of in the trees. The right move would be thinning and prescribed burns, but this administration isn't going to do that.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] njm1314@lemmy.world 244 points 2 weeks ago

These are our forests. They belong to the US people. They're being stolen from us. For private profit of a few.

[-] Klear@sh.itjust.works 65 points 2 weeks ago

It's an American tradition.

[-] Fluke@lemm.ee 21 points 2 weeks ago

I mean, as the other guy pointed out, you as a people stole the fucking lot and literally massacred thousands upon thousands of people to do it.

Shoe's on the other foot now, eh?

[-] suite403@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

Both times it was the government to the greatest extent.

[-] Fluke@lemm.ee 6 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

"The government" offered money for the task, and thousands took that money and got on with the job.

"The Government" is people. Usually the worst, most manipulative self-serving people. It does what other people let it get away with.

[-] Bloomcole@lemmy.world 11 points 2 weeks ago
[-] Butterpaderp@lemmy.world 13 points 2 weeks ago

"They're gonna chop down national forests"

"bUt WhAT aBoUt ThE iNdIaNs???"

bruh

[-] baines@lemmy.cafe 3 points 2 weeks ago

more like ‘now you care? lol’

[-] suite403@lemmy.world 10 points 2 weeks ago

Sorry I didn't care 400 years ago. I'll try harder.

[-] Fluke@lemm.ee 4 points 2 weeks ago

How many cared when it was decided there would be an oil pipeline through the pittance they were relegated to? More land stolen, and everything around it polluted in time to add insult to injury.

Did you care then, just a few years ago?

[-] suite403@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago
[-] Fluke@lemm.ee 2 points 2 weeks ago

Not near enough to actually change a damn thing though, was it?

I mean shit, the company responsible is now trying to take down Greenpeace -the entire entity- in court over the whole affair, it is that confident in how fucked the US judicial system is.

They got to choose where to hold a trial with global ramifications, and tainted the entire possible jury pool by restricting it to some poxy little oil town that would cease to exist if not for the oil industry.

How many of you turned out to protest that?

[-] baines@lemmy.cafe 1 points 2 weeks ago

that’s better than nothing but that’s self interest and farmers were right to be worried

none of that changes anything on a national level nor changed the actual outcome so the criticism is still valid

[-] baines@lemmy.cafe 3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

it’s happening to native lands in the US while we speak, the fact you are not even aware earns the ‘lol’

[-] Bloomcole@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

Americans get real mad when confronted with their hypocrisy.

[-] Bloomcole@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

“bUt WhAT aBoUt ThE iNdIaNs???”

bruh

The opinion of people who write like this can't be take seriously

[-] Empricorn@feddit.nl 3 points 2 weeks ago

Whataboutism.

2 wrongs don't make a right.

[-] Bloomcole@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

The point is that you admit your wrongs.
As they clearly can't and get very defensive, as hypocrites do.

this post was submitted on 06 Apr 2025
770 points (100.0% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

6449 readers
292 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS