as well as deepfakes seeking to meddle with elections or damage any individuals' or corporations' reputations.
Everything before this doesn't matter. This is the onlyreason for that law - they want to criminalize any sort of satire. Who exactly will be determining the line between a deepfake and a caricature?
I'm not a lawyer so this is just my layperson's read, but looking at the actual law it seems like in order for it to actually count as "deceptive" it needs to be presented as real. If there's a disclaimer saying it's fake, it wouldn't be illegal under this law, so it seems like satire isn't the main target.
It could mean that effectively caricature artists become one of the first professions protected by law from AI slop, kind of accidentally, and I don’t have that much problem with that.
Based.
They had me until the last three words.
I was more talking about what the girl was doing, and not what that governor did.
Thats why I pick long dead niche ppl for my ais appearence
A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.
Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.
Subcommunities on Beehaw:
This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.