12

This is something I always get in arguments about, whenever I use the word tankie hexbear and grad users argue that its just a term for socialists.

I've always just used it to referr to authoritarian communists, i.e, people who unironically support modern russia, and/or oppose ukraine, and think nothing happened to the uyghurs.

top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works 5 points 3 days ago

Supports 'socalist' authoritarianism

[-] Tomassci@sh.itjust.works 12 points 5 days ago

Tankies I define as Authoritarian state apologists, who support authoritarian states without any critical examination of that belief.

[-] rockerface@lemm.ee 3 points 4 days ago

Pretty much this. I see a lot of arguments that their support of russia is "critical support" but there's no criticism of it in their discussions. Being against the western imperialism, it seems, automatically grants a country a title of "lesser evil" and everything it does gets conveniently glossed over.

That said, I can't in good faith assert that everyone or even majority of the users on so-called "tankie triad" instances are tankies. It's more that the tankies have a loud presence there that isn't moderated. Most of the people from hexbear and .ml I've interacted with have been polite and rational in explaining their worldview.

[-] remer@lemmy.world 8 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Authoritarian left who think the end justifies the means. They’re willing to use extreme systematic violence to achieve a communist society.

[-] boredtortoise@lemm.ee 4 points 5 days ago
[-] Irelephant@lemm.ee 5 points 4 days ago

Thats dangerously close to the "no true scotsman" fallacy.

[-] TheDemonBuer@lemmy.world 6 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

It isn't close to, it is the no true Scotsman fallacy.

Communism (from Latin communis, 'common, universal') is a sociopolitical, philosophical, and economic ideology within the socialist movement, whose goal is the creation of a communist society, a socioeconomic order centered on common ownership of the means of production, distribution, and exchange that allocates products to everyone in society based on need. A communist society would entail the absence of private property and social classes, and ultimately money and the state (or nation state).

Communists often seek a voluntary state of self-governance but disagree on the means to this end. This reflects a distinction between a libertarian socialist approach of communization, revolutionary spontaneity, and workers' self-management, and an authoritarian socialist, vanguardist, or party-driven approach under a socialist state, which is eventually expected to wither away.

[-] amino 5 points 4 days ago

their end goal is state capitalism though, so I don't see the contradiction

[-] FundMECFSResearch 4 points 4 days ago

Yeah. If they call the current state of China with literal billionaires, communist, then they aren’t communist in any economically defined sense of the world

[-] boredtortoise@lemm.ee 3 points 4 days ago

It's only a fallacy when used wrong

[-] frightful_hobgoblin@lemmy.ml 2 points 5 days ago

authoritarian communists, i.e, people who unironically support modern russia

🤦

this post was submitted on 01 Apr 2025
12 points (100.0% liked)

The Democratic People's™ Republic of Tankiejerk

816 readers
3 users here now

Dunking on Tankies from a leftist, anti-capitalist perspective.

Rules:

  1. Be civil and no bigotry of any kind.
  2. No tankies or right-wingers. Liberals are allowed so long as they are aware of this
  3. No genocide denial

We allow posts about tankie behavior even off fedi, shitposts, and rational, leftist discussion. For a more general community !meanwhileongrad@sh.itjust.works is recommended.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS