118

I know Gnome is the default on popular distros: Fedora, Ubuntu, Rhel, Pop OS (it's Cosmic Desktop yes but it is still based on Gnome)...etc. But Gnome just doesnt work for me. I would pick XFCE - stable and no BS.

Before Manjaro and their cetificate shenanigan, I used to use their XFCE version. At the time, it was marketed as the "Flagship Manjaro version". I went 4 years without any problems and I did tinker a lot, just couldnt get their XFCE to break.

After a tough Arch or Gentoo installs, I just want to put XFCE on and call it a day.

What about you guys?

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Dragonlord21@feddit.org 1 points 1 day ago
[-] Kory@lemmy.ml 59 points 6 days ago

That's not too hard a question for me, I've been using the same DE for years: KDE

[-] aksdb@lemmy.world 14 points 6 days ago

KDE is one of the main reasons for me to use Linux. I immensely like the performance, silence and battery lifetime of MacBooks. But if I have to work with anything but KDE, it's not worth it for me. The only thing OSX does better than basically any other desktop out there, is the ability to drag whole virtual screen between monitors.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] MangoPenguin 13 points 4 days ago

Probably KDE, it's the most 'complete' feeling to me with settings and GUI for most things.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] potemkinhr@lemmy.ml 7 points 4 days ago

KDE plasma. Coming from 30 years of running exclusively windows it's just the most comfortable and easy for me to use (way more than Gnome). Easily configurable, works. Can't ask for more.

[-] AugustWest@lemm.ee 21 points 5 days ago

KDE. Been upgrading the same environment for 5 years just keeps getting better.

I started around maybe KDE 3?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] the16bitgamer@programming.dev 6 points 4 days ago

Cinnamon for 2 reasons

  1. KDE is missing a lot of features which still only works in Gnome. Like the taskbar Calendar app syncing events with services like Google Calendar

  2. cinnamon is extremely stable and doesn’t move your icons around when you connect to an external display with your laptop and the display has a different resolution.

[-] 6R1MR34P3R@lemmy.ml 5 points 4 days ago

KDE Plasma for ease of use if using Nvidia Otherwise Hyprland or exwm

[-] lengau@midwest.social 14 points 5 days ago

This isn't even hard. KDE without a second thought.

I regularly try other desktops, and I regularly come back to the only desktop with any sort of reasonable thought put into it.

[-] ludicolo@lemmy.ml 10 points 4 days ago

KDE the customization is off the charts

[-] AusatKeyboardPremi@lemmy.world 5 points 4 days ago

MATE has been on most of my machines, except the BSD ones.

But past year or so, I have grown a fondness towards ctwm, and gradually migrated my machines to it, Linux and BSD alike.

It is not a DE, but the fact that I have to assemble my suite of software myself on my machines, makes the point of using DEs moot.

[-] nafzib@lemmy.world 12 points 5 days ago

KDE for sure. The modern versions look exactly like how I want a desktop environment to look out of the box, and they keep the full range of customizability that a desktop should, IMO, allow it's users to have. Which is something Windows just kept slowly getting rid of over the years.

I also prefer to have a taskbar that is ever present with a traditional start menu that's cleanly organized by category rather than the current full screen pop up "activities" search thing gnome does nowadays.

[-] intelisense@lemm.ee 32 points 6 days ago
[-] Lemmchen@feddit.org 30 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

I'd rather not use a computer at all than use GNOME for the rest of my live.
For me it's KDE Plasma all the way.

[-] Photuris@lemmy.ml 29 points 6 days ago

It’s wild to me how GNOME evokes such strong opinions in folks. It really is a love it or hate it kind of deal (I’m in the “love it” camp).

I wonder why that is. I like KDE ok, but it doesn’t elicit a strong emotion from me. KDE works fine, I just really like GNOME.

There must be something about GNOME in particular that some people love, and others hate.

[-] semperverus@lemmy.world 27 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

For those of us that expect room to breathe and make our machine work for us rather than the other way around, we feel like Gnome takes a lot of liberties away for the sake of "simplicity." There is so much missing from Gnome that is present in most other DEs and even custom WM setups.

The primary contributors who work under The Gnome Foundation also come off as controlling and arrogant in a lot of cases, and refuse to take community feedback to heart, whereas KDE has literal summits to get user feedback on major core features we want to see which then later get added to their backlogs and sprints as Epics. Gnome acts a lot like Apple in the sense that they're very much "we know what's best for you better than you do."

Now, the singular area I can give Gnome true props in is their accessibility functionality, but that's primarily it. KDE's accessibility is fairly behind by about a decade in comparison.

That's just my take, take it as you will.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] ikidd@lemmy.world 12 points 5 days ago

Honestly, that defaulting to the Search field in the Save dialog when I'm trying to save something just gets me wild. It beggars the imagination why the developers think that's a reasonable thing to do and it colors my whole perception of the DE.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] domi@lemmy.secnd.me 12 points 5 days ago

There must be something about GNOME in particular that some people love, and others hate.

GNOME is heavily opinionated.

As such it gets praise from people that share that opinion and gets hate from the people that do not. Many other DEs are much more configurable, giving a broader audience the possibility to adjust everything to their liking.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
[-] jokro@feddit.org 25 points 5 days ago

GNOME because it works out of the box like GNOME

[-] Wojwo@lemmy.ml 4 points 4 days ago

KDE plasma, unless it's on a tablet, then Gnome

[-] eric5949@lemmy.world 29 points 6 days ago

Plasma, been using it since I was a kid

[-] statler_waldorf@sopuli.xyz 14 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Plasma's not that old, it just came out a few years ago...

2008?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] warmaster@lemmy.world 22 points 5 days ago

KDE Plasma.

It has been great for gaming, adopting Wayland protocols at a faster rate than other DEs due in part thanks to Valve's contributions.

I freaking love GNOME & Adwaita, but I'll switch back when I deem it better than Plasma.

[-] slembcke@lemmy.ml 15 points 5 days ago

Definitely Gnome here. Though I have a long list of notes, it mostly just works exactly like I expect with little friction or guessing. I donate $100/year to both Gnome and KDE since they are both good pieces of software, and I love that I get to chose mine. Further, I think KDE is the logical choice for something like the SteamDeck where it's going to have a lot of gamers that expect computers to work like Windows. (even if I don't like it, >_<)

[-] floppybutton@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 5 days ago

I keep coming back to KDE time and time again. It's so easy to mess with, I can set it up exactly how I like it without much effort, and it always looks good because someone else did all the work making themes and widgets I use.

That said, I love XFCE, I'm just trash with CSS so it takes me forever to get it how I like, and on my Surface I can't get the scaling to work so everything is beyond tiny.

[-] lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Cinnamon by and far.

I've used so many distros and DEs I don't even know where to begin, but Cinnamon got me hooked for the long run. It's legitimately the most polished and "ready to run" DE I've ever used, yet still allowing for far more customization than Windows ever offered.

[-] Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de 16 points 5 days ago

My computer doesn't really break, I'm Ship of Theseus-ing it regularly.

Apart from that, the only one among the normal window based ones that has felt like it respects my will to configure stuff in ways that feel right to me has been KDE Plasma.

[-] OmegaLemmy@discuss.online 12 points 5 days ago
[-] Aelis@lemm.ee 8 points 5 days ago

Always wanted to like gnome but never could, and xfce is fine but I much prefer KDE, it is verry likely that I'll actually keep it till my pc breaks.

[-] easily3667@lemmus.org 6 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

That's the beauty of gnome: they don't give a single fuck if you like it. You can return the favor.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] JakobFel@retrolemmy.com 5 points 4 days ago

Probably Plasma because it's familiar and you're able to customize it extensively over time.

[-] Asparagus0098@sh.itjust.works 16 points 6 days ago
[-] hobbsc@lemmy.sdf.org 6 points 5 days ago

I currently use GNOME and would continue to but if it were a low spec machine, probably icewm or jwm.

y'all sure like KDE though 🤢

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Drito@sh.itjust.works 7 points 5 days ago

There is nothing better than Xfce, if you dont like the desktop, at least Xfce allows you to customize. KDE seems interesting, but the last time i tried it, 10 years ago more or less, it was a bit buggy.

[-] dman87@sh.itjust.works 15 points 5 days ago

You owe KDE a second look if it's been that long.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Artopal@lemmy.ml 6 points 5 days ago
[-] TheGreenWizard@lemmy.zip 5 points 4 days ago

I'm a cog in the machine and use KDE, but xfce is awesome, I would use xfce if I couldn't use KDE.

[-] njordomir@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago

KDE for the desktop and xfce for the laptop

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] oldfart@lemm.ee 15 points 6 days ago

XFCE, using it for over 10 years, not planning to change it unless the DE changes radically.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] pH3ra@lemmy.ml 8 points 5 days ago

I'd say Gnome, since I'm so used to it that I feel it doesn't get in the way of the things I'm doing.
Because that would be my aim: something that doesn't interfere with the work I am doing.

[-] lemmeBe@sh.itjust.works 14 points 6 days ago

KDE - I love to tinker and own my DE. 😎

[-] daggermoon@lemmy.world 8 points 5 days ago

KDE Plasma, I can't go back to SDR

[-] PurpleClouds@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

Switched from i3 to sway to hyland. I like the virtual desktop setup and noiseless facing interaction.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 28 Mar 2025
118 points (100.0% liked)

Linux

52739 readers
339 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS