56

Still, Greenlanders this is your chance to give these assholes those cheap European eggs Trump has been begging for.

top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world 47 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Dogsled races had nothing to do with it.

They were literally going to Greenland in order to find citizens who wanted to be a part of the US so they could film a propaganda video justifying Greenland's forced annexation, and were promptly told to fuck all the way off.

The best part was that it wasn’t even an official dismissal / declaration of persona non grata. It was that they had people literally going door to door, and nobody - like, literally fucking NOBODY - was in any way receptive to the idea.

Greenlanders go fucking hard. I love it. ❤️ 🇬🇱

[-] Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago

Don't get me wrong. That was absolutely chef's kiss.

But the government still should have declared them persona non grata just to show solidarity and a willingness to tell Trump to fuck off.

They should have done it after all their citizens told the idiots fuck off. Perfect situation for rubbing salt in the wound.

[-] Xanthobilly@lemmy.world 26 points 1 week ago

No, this title displaces the blame. The Trump administration bootstrapped a Greenland visit onto an invitation to a dogsled event, it got downgraded after no one wanted them there. It’s similar to Trump’s approach to dating: just force yourself onto the victim while they’re saying no.

[-] Sirus@lemm.ee 15 points 1 week ago

I hope greenlanders turn into the IRA if America tries to take it over. Seriously, we don't want greenland. It's just the orange ass-hat

Just invite some Finns over and give us a taste of the ol’ white death with their help.

[-] futatorius@lemm.ee 3 points 1 week ago

hope greenlanders turn into the IRA if America tries to take it over.

Snowmobile bombs? Harpoon attacks on pubs frequented by American military personnel?

[-] UpperBroccoli 3 points 1 week ago

"under Dutch control". Damn muppets.

[-] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 week ago

It's not always easy or obvious how to deal with uninvited guests. Just ask Danish and Greenlandic officials. They welcomed a U.S. decision to alter a planned visit this week to the Arctic territory they said was not wanted or needed. It threatened an icy reception amid President Donald Trump's vow to control Greenland.

"It's very positive the Americans canceled," Denmark's Foreign Minister Lars Lokke Rasmussen said Wednesday.

We’re very popular. /s

this post was submitted on 27 Mar 2025
56 points (100.0% liked)

politics

22730 readers
3146 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS