490

Summary:


Donald Trump has signed a far-reaching executive order that promises to fundamentally disrupt American voter registration processes, introducing measures so restrictive they could in effect disenfranchise millions of citizens if enacted.

Described by Will Scharf, the White House staff secretary, on Tuesday as “the farthest reaching executive action taken” in the nation’s history, the order represents the latest in a long list of assaults against immigration, but also on current voting systems.

The sweeping order amends the federal voter registration form to require proof of citizenship in order to vote. It demands documentary proof for citizenship such as a passport to be eligible to vote in federal elections, empowers federal agencies to cut funding to states deemed non-compliant and instructs the Department of Justice to prosecute what the White House paints as “election crimes”. All the executive orders Trump has signed so far Read more

The measure also seeks to block states from accepting mail-in ballots after election day, regardless of when they are mailed in.

Many of the provisions in the order are likely to be quickly challenged and are legally suspect. The US constitution explicitly gives states and Congress the authority to set the rules for election and does not authorize the president to do so.

“The short answer is that this executive order, like all too many that we’ve seen before, is lawless and asserts all sorts of executive authority that he most assuredly does not have,” said Danielle Lang, a voting rights lawyer at the non-profit Campaign Legal Center.

Republicans have long sought to add a citizenship to the federal form and been stymied by the courts. In a 7-2 decision in 2013, for example, the US supreme court said that Arizona could not require proof of citizenship to vote in federal elections. The power to set the requirements on the federal form is left to the bipartisan Election Assistance Commission. Courts have also blocked efforts to short-circuit efforts to add the question.

The order tracks with a controversial bill in Congress Safeguard American Voter Eligibility (Save) Act, which would require Americans to prove citizenship in person – a requirement that could immediately eliminate mail-in and online voter registration already across 42 states, as well as DC and Guam.


top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Rhaedas@fedia.io 166 points 1 month ago

"The short answer is that this executive order, like all too many that we’ve seen before, is lawless and asserts all sorts of executive authority that he most assuredly does not have."

Yes. Agreed. How's the whole shouting, "hey, this isn't legal" working out so far? The key to having laws is also enforcing said laws. Not doing great on that part so far.

[-] zbyte64@awful.systems 90 points 1 month ago

Hey, the Democratic leadership did more than shouting. They also approved the GOP budget for the next 6 months.....

[-] RandoMcRanderton@lemmy.world 41 points 1 month ago

Don't forget the paddles! They also "slammed" Trump by holding up paddles. So brave.

[-] quack@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 month ago

Oh my god they’re so aggressively lib, I want to throw up.

[-] oxysis@lemm.ee 8 points 1 month ago

Hey hey hey! Don’t forget giving a rubber stamp to Trump and his butt buddies slashing whatever they want to “””fix””” the deficit!

[-] Wilco@lemm.ee 20 points 1 month ago

Many of his deranged executive orders are actually getting halted and reversed.

The president can't suffer consequences for disobeying a judge (apparently), but his idiotic followers sure can.

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

Well, it's going to be hard to enforce when the courts rule against them. Because the states run the elections.

[-] dryfter@lemm.ee 71 points 1 month ago

Oh hey, look! I don't have a Real ID or a Passport. I already can't fly or enter federal buildings. Now I won't be able to vote? They're basically making it a requirement to have a Real ID or Passport to be considered a citizen at this point.

Millions of poor people are about to lose their U.S. citizenship is what this sounds like it's coming to.

[-] aesthelete@lemmy.world 35 points 1 month ago

Democrats are fighting on the wrong side of this issue and have been for some time IMO. I think requiring them is 100% fine, but they should be fucking free.

[-] nxttms@lemy.nl 11 points 1 month ago

Yeah, in all EU countries people get a national ID card when they're in their teens and then get automatically added to the voter registry when they're 18.

It's mandatory to have an ID card and it's provided for free.

For every election all I have to do is show up, show my ID card and cast my vote. It baffles me why it doesn't work like this in the US and why is it even controversial.

(At least as far as I know, this is how it works in all EU countries)

[-] Ithral 8 points 1 month ago

It doesn't work like this in the US in part because some consider it illegal under the first and fourth amendments for the federal government to mandate identification. This also ties back into the early history of identification documents in the us that sparked a lot of outrage.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago

Yes and no. The issue is really with the difficulty and time it takes to get these ids. Not to mention the expense. The poorer a person is, the less likely they are to have the correct id. And make no mistake, the Republicans know this, and they know that poor people favor democrats. Same with mail in voters. So their effort to make this rule is not one of common sense, but stratrgic value. They are just trying to put up obstacles that making voting hardrr for people who don't vote from them.

And really, what should be addressed is the difficulty of getting id. But noone wants to pay for that. This causes some people to have to travel significant distances on our meager public transit system which can take many hours to go 15 miles. And again, the poorer a person is, the less likely they are to have a car to drive, or the money to uber, or the time away from work to get to these places and even attempt to get the id.

https://www.voteriders.org/analysis-millions-lack-voter-id/

[-] aesthelete@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

And really, what should be addressed is the difficulty of getting id. But noone wants to pay for that.

That's my point. Fix that. Everyone gives up on that without even half a fight.

To casual observers, it looks like you're arguing for voter fraud. Then Republicans can cynically appeal to the stupidest people by making that argument directly.

[-] mrbeano@lemm.ee 4 points 1 month ago

But... why?

Voter fraud isn't an issue that needs solving. Yes, we could (should) make an ID easier to get, but not for this. Conservatives would just move the goalposts again and add more roadblocks for the voters they don't like.

If you give a fascist a cookie...

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] tehn00bi@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

Because they control the media grandpa is watching all day and know he has the time to show up and vote.

[-] andros_rex@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago

Red states also resisted the RealID rollout. They kept having to delay the requirements for requiring them for flights, because states like Oklahoma were pissing and moaning the entire time.

The same kinds of places that don’t want the wrong kind of people to vote intentionally have made the process of getting that identification difficult. I have no idea why I was turned away for a RealID a few years ago, and now I’m not even going to try because having my marker reverted back to an ‘F’ would probably get me killed.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] misteloct@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

Get yours now before the DMV ceases to exist. See the strategy now?

[-] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 57 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Barring transit delayed mail-in ballots is 100% the way these fucks will steal the next election.

I hope Vermont doesn't deregister me - thankfully voting administration is done by the individual states so they'll likely push back on the EO but I'm absolutely not going to fly to Burlington to prove my identity in person.

[-] zbyte64@awful.systems 50 points 1 month ago

The move really synergizes with privatizing the USPS....

[-] sp3tr4l@lemmy.zip 51 points 1 month ago

So uh, only about half of Americans actually have active, valid passports.

So thats a neat trick to disenfranchise half the population, instantly.

I'm guessing the next thing will be to fire everyone involved in processing and issuing passports.

[-] stickly@lemmy.world 27 points 1 month ago

Even better than that, the Fed can nullify your passport at any time

[-] sp3tr4l@lemmy.zip 21 points 1 month ago

Oh fuck right.

Yeah, I guess basically all trans people are now inelligible to vote, along with... yeah, basically anyone with sufficient melanation that the government decides is an immigrant, for any reason.

... Yeah this is pretty fucking bad.

[-] FrChazzz@lemm.ee 13 points 1 month ago

Also DOGE cutting the workforce that would process things like this, ensuring that people have even more trouble getting proper documentation for voting.

[insert Andy Samberg saying “cool cool cool cool cool cool…”]

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] BradleyUffner@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago

Half the people in the country have passports? That's seems WAY too high of an estimate. Even just thinking of the people I know who's status I'm sure of, only about 10% have one, and most of those are expired.

[-] sp3tr4l@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

The figure I found was just an estimate, and yes, I agree, the actual number is probably lower, but I wasn't able to find ... precise numbers.

If you live in the US, and you either never, or rarely travel internationally?

Yeah, you don't actually have any reason to actually even go through the process and even get a passport, or keep it current.

... Well, until right now, apparently.

Fucking Glory to Arstotkza! I guess..

[-] quack@lemmy.zip 42 points 1 month ago

I’m so sick of seeing “Trump has just signed this insane executive order but don’t worry, what he’s doing is actually ✨_illegal!_✨”

Yeah, well who the fuck is stopping him them? Because from where I’m standing, it seems like no one is.

Fascism has well and truly arrived in the US and American libs still have this insane idea that it can be stopped by the rule of law and the checks and balances they love so much. Well they don’t fucking work when your opponent ignores them and every bureaucrat in government allows him to do so. When the history books are written, let these people be regarded in the same way as those who thought they could work with or appease Hitler.

[-] Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world 20 points 1 month ago

The people spending long hours working to challenge his illegal efforts in court are who is stopping him. And they are winning, a lot. But courts take time, so trump uses the gap to cause chaos and slip in a few illegal actions.

Thanks to them, in the long term trumps presidency will cost many X more then any savings it is claiming. There will be tons of payouts to federal employees, legal expenses, and the cost of putting back together what he has damaged or destroyed.

All that aside, I don’t here people saying don't worry. I see them saying that his team and his efforts are incompetent attempts to garner attention. Essentially they are just saying that this crew is idiots.

[-] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 month ago

Plus when all the contracts get litigated in court the taxpayers will end up paying for a majority of the remaining unexpended funds to payout for legally reimbursable project expenses.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] CitizenKong@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

Well, those were conservatives too.

[-] tacobellhop@midwest.social 4 points 1 month ago

Not a single disparaging remark about the conservative majority in all 3 branches of government thrusting the knife into the dying corpse of our republic. No why didn’t neoliberals stop them.

Dont paint all these caucuses as the same general groups of people. Like 11% of the representatives of the electors are gutting us alive.

[-] Fluke@lemm.ee 4 points 1 month ago

While those being gutted just stand by and do nothing.

If you have the power to stop something, and choose not to, you're choosing to help. That makes you complicit, and history will not be kind to you.

[-] tacobellhop@midwest.social 5 points 1 month ago

Are you holding or attending labor resistance movement assemblies in private?

[-] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 36 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

empowers federal agencies to cut funding to states deemed non-compliant and instructs the Department of Justice to prosecute what the White House paints as “election crimes”.

This is the bigger problem, it will allow them to “fix” elections

[-] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 16 points 1 month ago

“Election crimes”

Being a minority and voting liberal.

[-] OneWomanCreamTeam@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 month ago

Being a minority ~~and~~ or voting liberal

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] ryrybang@lemmy.world 27 points 1 month ago

Just ignore the fucking thing. It isn't a law. Don't pretend it is one. Don't try and interpret it. Just ignore it.

[-] Lucky_777@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago

This is the answer. Why even act on these bullshit EO? Just ignore forever. Not like Trump will get his fat ass up to enforce.

[-] kablammy@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 month ago

The "enforcement" will be "blue states x, y, z did not follow this rule, so their electoral college votes are invalid and will not be accepted".

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Bonesince1997@lemmy.world 16 points 1 month ago

After bad faith testing the water like this over and over you should no longer be allowed to be president, seeing as you can't follow the rules, the law, or the constitution. We can see what you're doing. It should be over for him now.

[-] seeigel@feddit.org 13 points 1 month ago

The funny thing is that this could be easily mitigated if the left reached out to their neighbors and helped each other get the IDs. This can become a great opportunity to organize.

[-] orcrist@lemm.ee 18 points 1 month ago

No, it can't. Passports take months to get and cost money, for example. Disenfranchisement of the poor.

Also, why would Trump stop here? Wannabe dictators never let opponents compete fairly. If you overcome this hurdle, he'll just make another ruling designed to undercut your vote. That's why we need to fight against all of his changes. The power grab itself is the existential threat, not the individual action.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] andros_rex@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

The line at every DMV at all three of the cities I have lived and worked in starts at 3 am.

To get my drivers license the first time, we had to try three times to get a testing spot. (And the first time they failed me because of my leftist bumper stickers 🙃)

I tried to get a real ID a couple years ago, and somehow my documentation wasn’t correct. They demanded my marriage license and didn’t like something about it.

Bureaucratic institutions have already not been functioning in the south.

[-] ZetaLightning94@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago

Doesnt that make it harder for the majority of GOP voters to vote?

[-] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 month ago

I guess the one piece of good news? (Gosh it's fucking slim) is that if there is a Democratic president in the future they can mandate national voting by mail if the SC doesn't injunction this bullshit.

[-] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

This is how it happens!

[-] RandAlThor@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 month ago

I swear all he's doing this is to distract the media attention!

[-] wuphysics87@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 month ago

Joke's on you. Billy Bob Joe Bob and his pig cousin Suuuuey Jane Sue Jane don't have passports

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 25 Mar 2025
490 points (100.0% liked)

politics

23571 readers
2897 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS