The old "fire them all and then rehire them and add them to the job creation numbers" gambit.
I don't believe them.
Imagine all the money that could have been saved by simply not doing that
Imagine thinking it was ever about saving money
Yeah, the fact that they're immediately putting these workers the courts are forcing them to rehire onto administrative leave (where they still get paid but just aren't allowed to do any work) is a pretty clear demonstration it's just about stopping the government from doing things Republicans don't like
And about flexing how much a fake department with fake officials can get away with while the public does nothing to stop them- it’s a demoralization tactic.
Firing one certain drugged up imbecile could have been so efficient.
WE ARE WORKING DILIGENTLY TO UNFUCK THIS DOG THAT WE FUCKED TO DEATH.
Kristi Noem has entered the chat
This still works for Elon. He'll just say they tried to streamline the government and save money but the Democrats wouldn't let them.
The Democrats need to start strategically badmouthing and disrupting DOGE otherwise all the blame will be placed on them.
What's that? Peering over their half-moon glasses to express their mild regrets at consenting to everything the Republicans demand? Yes, Democrats can do that, and even hold a small sign saying "I continue to have doubts about this" while they do it.
This is some 7d chess. They're going to run federal workers on a jury duty system, everyone gets a group number and you call every Monday to find out if you need to come in.
Not wild enough, needs more Calvinball and Squid Game. You'll be presiding over court cases of other fires employees but to stay employed you have a quota of terminations to fill while jumping rope.
There’s no waste rehiring fired staffers. None.
They better.
Art of the deal-do
News
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.