872
submitted 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) by Ragdoll_X@sh.itjust.works to c/atheistmemes@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Nugscree@lemmy.world 25 points 1 day ago

The question I get asked by religious people all the time is, without God, what's to stop me from raping all I want? And my answer is: I do rape all I want. And the amount I want is zero. And I do murder all I want, and the amount I want is zero. The fact that these people think that if they didn't have this person watching over them that they would go on killing, raping rampages is the most self-damning thing I can imagine. I don't want to do that. Right now, without any god, I don't want to jump across this table and strangle you. I have no desire to strangle you. I have no desire to flip you over and rape you. --Penn Jillette

Think of the man what you will, but this has to be the best answer for that dumb question.

Well, it is important to remember that he's a professional liar, so I don't know how true that is for him personally.

[-] in4apenny@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 day ago

I see your logic, atheists. Now apply that to "laws", "money", and "The State".

[-] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 8 points 1 day ago

Laws and the state exist to deal with the people that DO want to rape and murder. Money exists to provide a more convenient way to exchange goods and services.

[-] in4apenny@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 day ago

Laws and the state exist to deal with the people that DO want to rape and murder.

And religion doesn't? What subject are we talking about again?

Money exists to provide a more convenient way to exchange goods and services.

Is it the most convenient way? Have there been other ways? (Yes, there has, for thousands of years.)

[-] Ashenlux 4 points 1 day ago

Well, seeing the problems Catholic priests are having not touching little children, I'm going to go ahead and say no, religion is not a very good way to deal with people that do want to do such heinous acts.

[-] in4apenny@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 day ago

Catholic priests aren't all religions.

[-] Pandantic@midwest.social 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

So you are saying that people of all religions want to molest kids, but are held back from that because their God would disapprove?

Gosh, and here I am not wanting to molest kids all on my own.

But let’s go less icky - most people don’t want to molest kids. So let’s talk about stealing. What is keeping me from stealing from a big corpo like Walmart? Security cameras and laws. What is keeping me from stealing from my neighbors, and even other people at large? I respect other humans enough to not take the things that they have paid for. No security cameras, police aren’t around - I could go take my neighbors nice lawn mower out of his shed tonight and likely never get caught, but I don’t because I don’t want to deprive another human of things they worked hard to acquire.

I guess you’re saying that some people need religion because they have less of a moral compass than I, an atheist, have?

Edit: also, it doesn’t just happen Catholicism, and if you need the proof, I think there’s a community for that.

Edit 2: a downvote but not a rebuttal. 🙄

[-] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 2 points 1 day ago

And religion doesn’t? What subject are we talking about again?

Can't speak for anyone else but I've never seen god stop a rape/murder.

Is it the most convenient way? Have there been other ways? (Yes, there has, for thousands of years.)

We could go back to bartering I suppose but I'd rather carry a credit card around than a 60lb sack of grain or whatever people are trading for.

[-] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

This person allowed Elon Musk to stick his Nazi cock inside her.

She's not a sane individual.

[-] rizo@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I can't remember who said it but: If you being a good person depends on the fear of eternal damnation, then you are not a good person.

[-] PotatoLibre@feddit.it 1 points 1 day ago

That's why as an Italian I appreciate nordern countries. Luther reform fixed that and shifted the main point to the actual life.

When I moved to Sweden in a rich part of Stockholm I was not happy. Dealing with rich Italians left a disgusting feeling in me and I didn't want to live there. Then I got to meet the neighbors and they were actually really cool. Rich swedish people (normally rich, not talling about billionaires), are absolutely down on heart.

Anyway, I'm pretty sure this people would've been doing great even without religion. Luther isn't been a revolution, it's been an excaping. Not surprisingly, their modern and open Christianism is the one who's disappearing faster.

[-] NoxAstrum@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 day ago

I now see why she was stupid enough to get with elmo.

[-] frezik@midwest.social 2 points 1 day ago

Those two deserve each other.

[-] Ronno@feddit.nl 18 points 1 day ago

There are plenty examples of religious leaders raping and killing children and other offenses. But I guess they are above it all then?

[-] SidTheShuckle 4 points 1 day ago

The same god who allows rape and murder as long as you believe in him

[-] bier@feddit.nl 3 points 1 day ago

The entire argument is pretty stupid...

Do you believe in god? Yes

Does rape and murder happen? Yes

Can you rape and murder if you tried? Yes

So what does your god add to the situation? Is the only reason you don't do it out of fear? Yes/No?

Also do you really obey the laws of your god? Yes

So you don't ever wear both linnen and wool? Uh what?

And are you really sure you never sat where a menstruating women has been sitting?? Wait what?

How many different seeds are in your garden? ??

[-] in4apenny@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 day ago

Saying "Without laws I wouldn't do right from wrong" is also just as much a sociopathic self report imo. Same with "money" and "The State", i'm an atheist just like them except I go one or two gods further.

[-] Zess@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago

"Your religion isn't the same as morality." - Britta Perry

also, when has religion saying raping and killing children was wrong ever stopped a religious 'person' from raping and killing children? those are like their two favorite things to do.

[-] p3n@lemmy.world 44 points 2 days ago

If we can kill God, then it wasn't God that we killed...

[-] GraniteM@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

God is the all-powerful creator of the universe, all of the black holes and quasars, all of the laws of physics, the architect of the very Beginning and End of All Things... but He is in constant danger of destruction by a bunch of hippies and nerds.

[-] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

This is the fact that is so often overlooked because its too goddamn inconvenient for them to acknowledge.

[-] Maeve@kbin.earth 22 points 2 days ago

I think zealot answered that. It seems that people who can't manage themselves and their worst impulse want to manage others.

[-] reiterationstation@lemm.ee 13 points 2 days ago

Grimes and musk believe the AI is God. So there’s a good chance context is missing here on purpose because she’s aware enough to not go full crazy.

Bring back God = build the AI.

[-] Bytemeister@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

TBF, an overgrown autocorrect is more real to me than god, and in my opinion it's the more sane option to worship.

[-] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

they don't believe in god, so there's no belief in AI.

let me sum it up for you in a few words imagine they are the thoughts of our oppressors.

I am a god.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] WandowsVista@lemmy.world 29 points 2 days ago
[-] NotLemming@lemm.ee 1 points 1 day ago

When autism and fascism collide

The way i understood it was that it's a difference in organization of society. Some people can find meaning themselves, without needing somebody else to tell them what to do. Some people just need to be told what to do.

[-] NikkiDimes@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago

Some people find their meaning in telling others what to do.

[-] martin4598@lemm.ee 1 points 1 day ago

I haven't be taught religion, but i'm lucky enoigh to have had parents...

[-] fff45667@lemm.ee 1 points 1 day ago

If you need somebody watching over your shoulder + the threat of damnation to be a good person, you're not a good person.

[-] 7rokhym@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago

Our society killed God and replaced with Reason. For all the things this improved, it created another set of problems nearly everyone in the West is unaware of. Check out Voltaire's Bastards.

[-] endeavor@sopuli.xyz 24 points 2 days ago

There was just a case where a woman gave birth to a baby in the woods, left it there and left for a vacation. If it weren't for the family dog desperately trying to save the baby and getting noticed by a stranger, nobody would have ever known as even the rest of the family was defensive of the woman.

This shows morality is not only not an exclusively trait but not even an exclusively human trait.

[-] prole 12 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I am not sure that I agree that the dog's behavior necessarily demonstrates "morality." You might be anthropomorphizing a bit. I am not a biologist or anything, so I could be way off base... But is it not possible that the dog was acting on instincts to protect newborn offspring? Similar to when animals "adopt" babies from other species as their own?

Morality implies that the dog did a thing because it's "the right thing to do," when in reality, it might have just been a self-preservation instinct kicking in. Dog sees newborn that's clearly the offspring of the being that takes care of it, dog tries to preserve that newborn's life in order to keep the gravy train going.

Just my (again, non-expert) thoughts.

[-] endeavor@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 day ago

Zealots judging by the news coming out of america do not care about such trivial details as "facts", "medical science" and "behavioral science". It is unnecessary for them to take that into consideration.

[-] qyron@sopuli.xyz 8 points 2 days ago

You can remove the argument from morality safely from your answer just by stating the dog acted upon instinct, based off the notion dogs are pack animals, that have a closely knit symbiotic relatioship with human, which can be used to in favour of the dog finding a newborn activated the instinct of preserving their pack.

The way you approached the subject can be easily side tracked through arguing you are atributting self interest to the animals actions, as in, it keeps the newborn alive, thus, their own preservation is assured.

If acting on true self interest, the dog should have allowed the newborn to die.

Side note: who discards a newborn in such calous way? How unbalanced is the person?

[-] prole 2 points 1 day ago

If acting on true self interest, the dog should have allowed the newborn to die.

That's not necessarily true. No more human offspring means no more symbiotic relationship.

[-] qyron@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 day ago

No offspring, closer symbiotic relationship, with more resources available.

[-] prole 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Maybe.... We're probably overthinking it and it's just a "protect baby" instinct.

[-] qyron@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 day ago

And that is a very possible scenario.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] zib@lemmy.world 49 points 3 days ago

If fear of divine retribution is your only reason for being a good person, then you are not a good person.

[-] cmbabul@lemmy.world 61 points 3 days ago

Someone that fucked Elon should really keep ideas about morality out of their fucking mouth

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] nomugisan@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 day ago
[-] HalfSalesman@lemm.ee 1 points 1 day ago

What do you mean?

[-] Frozengyro@lemmy.world 33 points 3 days ago

"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness."

Emphasis my own. Yes there is a self evident morality, you don't need God to tell you what's right and wrong.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] x00z@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago

I think her argument was that religion offered an easy way to make moral choices.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 15 Mar 2025
872 points (100.0% liked)

Atheist Memes

6059 readers
19 users here now

About

A community for the most based memes from atheists, agnostics, antitheists, and skeptics.

Rules

  1. No Pro-Religious or Anti-Atheist Content.

  2. No Unrelated Content. All posts must be memes related to the topic of atheism and/or religion.

  3. No bigotry.

  4. Attack ideas not people.

  5. Spammers and trolls will be instantly banned no exceptions.

  6. No False Reporting

  7. NSFW posts must be marked as such.

Resources

International Suicide Hotlines

Recovering From Religion

Happy Whole Way

Non Religious Organizations

Freedom From Religion Foundation

Atheist Republic

Atheists for Liberty

American Atheists

Ex-theist Communities

!exchristian@lemmy.one

!exmormon@lemmy.world

!exmuslim@lemmy.world

Other Similar Communities

!religiouscringe@midwest.social

!priest_arrested@lemmy.world

!atheism@lemmy.world

!atheism@lemmy.ml

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS