760
submitted 3 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

Summary

A Fox News host, Jessica Tarlov, highlighted Trump's declining approval ratings, citing a new Quinnipiac poll showing 53% of voters disapprove of his second-term performance.

Trump is "underwater on everything" including economy, federal workforce management, Ukraine-Russia policy, and trade relations with Mexico and Canada.

The polling slide comes amid stock market tumbles, federal worker layoffs, and trade tensions.

Tarlov noted that Republican members of Congress are facing hostile town halls where constituents are challenging them on federal workforce cuts, including at the VA. Some Republicans have dismissed these angry constituents as "paid actors."

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] MagicShel@lemmy.zip 134 points 3 months ago

On the one hand, I support a politician who does the right things despite public opinion. Fuck approval ratings. On the other hand, how can a single person be wrong about fucking everything? Even a stopped clock is right twice a day.

[-] Joncash2@lemmy.ml 55 points 3 months ago

I mean depends on how you look at it. In many ways, the world NEEDS to get off it's dollar addiction. Having a hegemonic currency isn't great for humanity as a whole. And Trump is doing the very best I've ever seen at helping the world cure itself of this problem. Not great for USA, but an important step for how geopolitics will work moving forward. Unless you meant doing everything wrong for Americans, then yes, Trump is awful.

[-] adespoton@lemmy.ca 38 points 3 months ago

It’s pretty destabilizing globally too. I don’t see the dollar addiction going anywhere; it’s just changing currencies.

We really don’t need China or Russia (or KSA or EU) calling the shots globally either.

[-] N0t_5ure@lemmy.world 14 points 3 months ago

There is a reason central banks are buying gold, and that it is making new all-time highs, and recently breached $3K/oz. They're anticipating the demise of the dollar, and minimizing their exposure to the chaos from the U.S. and buying gold instead of U.S. bonds. Look for this trend to accelerate, especially once the U.S. reaches the point where it can't sell enough bonds to finance it's budget deficit, leading to a massive debt crisis and the collapse of the dollar. Gold is already on track to be up >50% this year (up 13.7% so far ytd), and the consistent rise in gold while stocks and other investments fare poorly will only fuel the stampede. I'm confident that gold will end 2025 over $4k/oz, and that 2026 will be even crazier.

[-] My_IFAKs___gone@lemmy.world 15 points 3 months ago

Dammit, I should have never dropped out of my Applied Alchemy Program at the University of Phoenix.

[-] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 12 points 3 months ago

Those credits will transfer to clown college

[-] My_IFAKs___gone@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago

I was disenrolled against my will because my pants weren't baggy enough.

[-] Joncash2@lemmy.ml 8 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Not sure it will change. The global south and more importantly BRICS has created a system where local currencies are used. It's basically a currency swap. If this can be extended to all nations there won't be a currency hegemon at all. Of course while it's been working well for the countries that are doing it, it's hard to say what the effects would be on a global scale. Still, we should work towards it. Note I am not talking about the BRICS currency, which is not real. Not even sure why it gets brought up at all.

*Edit. This is an article about the expansion of China's currency swap deals.

https://watcher.guru/news/brics-push-currency-swap-with-29-countries-worth-550-billion

Note that while this is about China, all BRICS nations are making currency swap deals with each other. It's just easier to find articles about China doing this because China is so massive.

[-] SkyeStarfall 8 points 3 months ago

I don't know, I think what will just end up happening is china's "dollar" taking its place instead

We're just going to end up exchanging one superpower for another, it's not going to fundamentally fix the problem. For that you'd need to do it more sensibly

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] hikuro93@lemmy.ca 111 points 3 months ago

'He's underwater on everything' - except the one way that matters the most.

[-] aceshigh@lemmy.world 27 points 3 months ago

I’ll take “Things you can’t say on Reddit” for 200

But seriously, even if he was sleeping with the fish the r’s are still a huge a problem. He’s just the front guy, he’ll be replaced with another clown.

[-] hikuro93@lemmy.ca 13 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Sadly, yes. I mean, Trump knows he's 'close' to his grave and needs to leave some kind of legacy - even if it's the Hitler kind of one - his narcissistic self just wants to enter them history books as one of the big humans instead of 'another rich guy' as a footnote.

Pretty sure either Elon or Vance are already lined up for when the time comes. When Trump leaves the world, and when there's no longer actual rules preventing them from taking over and 'fixing' under martial law what big bad orange wrecked. At least according to them, that is.

No matter how bad what they're doing seems this is just the preparation stage. Things can become so, so much worse, and the more we let them consolidate power the tougher it'll be to fight it later.

[-] Grimy@lemmy.world 22 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Someone should start telling him no one has visited the titanic and he could be the first.

[-] Meron35@lemmy.world 11 points 3 months ago

He just bought a Tesla, and with any luck that'll drown him like it did Angela Chao, the billionaire magnate whose brother in law is Mitch McConnell.

Angela Chao: Shipping billionaire intoxicated when she drowned in Tesla, police report shows - https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-68622898

[-] ArtVandelay@lemmy.world 11 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

The American taxpayers just bought a Tesla, you mean. Cheeto will never set foot in that, and he sure as hell didn't pay for it himself.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] soycapitan451@lemmy.world 68 points 3 months ago

When the UK last had a moron setting everything on fire she was outlasted by a lettuce.

Americans need to up their game.

[-] jacksilver@lemmy.world 20 points 3 months ago

Sadly the US system is not designed to oust the president that easily. It would be a first if Trump was removed from office due to the impeachment process, removing the prime minister is a much lower bar.

[-] tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip 9 points 3 months ago

Impeachment should theoretically work but when the system was put in place it didn't account for an entire political party turning fascist

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] wabafee@lemmy.world 13 points 3 months ago

You suggesting a cabbage?

[-] Ferroto@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago

Sadly there isn't any equivalent to a non-confidence vote in US politics.

[-] Professorozone@lemmy.world 63 points 3 months ago

Am I the only one who thinks 53% of people disapproving of his performance is actually a pretty good record for him. This number should be in the 90's.

[-] hapablap@lemmy.sdf.org 8 points 3 months ago

You have to take into account that at least 30% of the total are likely "Trump is sent by God and is devinely inspired and therefore can do no wrong" crowd. So when his disapproval number hits 70% that's as high as it'll go.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] MuskyMelon@lemmy.world 60 points 3 months ago

He's not underwater where it really matters, physically.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] socsa@piefed.social 58 points 3 months ago

People when the world's most illiterate celebrity does all of the dumb, racist shit he says he is going to do:

[-] miss_demeanour@lemmy.dbzer0.com 58 points 3 months ago

"What Fox just reported is illegal."
-- DJT

[-] catsarebadpeople@sh.itjust.works 41 points 3 months ago

His next plan will be to start a war

[-] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 18 points 3 months ago
[-] Lemminary@lemmy.world 23 points 3 months ago

Or Greenland, or Canada, or Mexico... Truly a winning strategy to threaten everyone all at once. 🙄

[-] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 10 points 3 months ago

Oh for sure, but he's said to draw up plans to get Panama. So right now that's the most "real" one

[-] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 12 points 3 months ago

with his fucking cottage cheese brain he'll demand plans for invading Panama and then immediately invade Brazil

[-] TacoSocks@infosec.pub 9 points 3 months ago

I don't see him starting a war without complete control of the military. While they are working on it, firing leadership, changing rules and policies, the military still has the power to say no to Trump, which is bad TV. Trump is also a bitch as seen by the wishy-washy way he approaches tariffs, he hates actual action because he just wants good TV and bad policy makes for bad TV.

[-] ImADifferentBird 37 points 3 months ago

Some Republicans have dismissed these angry constituents as "paid actors."

SOROOOOOOOOS!

shakes tiny fist

[-] notsoshaihulud@lemmy.world 32 points 3 months ago

For a fascist disapproval of a slim majority definitely isn't "underwater" just a "minor inconvenience".

[-] Hubi@feddit.org 28 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

declining approval ratings, citing a new Quinnipiac poll showing 53% of voters disapprove of his second-term performance

Another Quinnipiac poll from last month determined 45 percent approved of Trump’s performance and 49 percent disapproved.

So half of the people still approve of what he's doing? How does such a small percentage even justify a news article with such a ridiculous headline? The US are so cooked it's not even funny. Wake me when it's at 90% disapproval.

[-] forrgott@lemm.ee 14 points 3 months ago

What stands out to me is that they are making a big deal out if a small change...to a Republican approval rating. This is exactly the type of data they'd be holding up while screaming about how bad Obama is, for instance. Did feel odd using the tactic against their own, let alone god emperor Cheeto.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[-] jaxxed@lemmy.ml 28 points 3 months ago

Approval ratings only impact elections

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] girlthing 22 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I wonder - what is the actual audience for approval rating polls?

The folks most affected by high prices or mass layoffs are probably struggling too much to have the time or inclination. Around 30% of the country didn't even show up for the election, they probably won't show up for these.

Who does that leave us with? Can we really assume that '47% approval' translates to '47% of all Americans approve'?

[-] Tja@programming.dev 19 points 3 months ago

Well, a month ago a majority still approved... so I guess it's a tiny minuscule progress? One eaten face at a time?

[-] ProIsh@lemmy.world 18 points 3 months ago

Jokes on them, he's not doing this for the American people.

[-] Zachariah@lemmy.world 14 points 3 months ago

“I already got your votes. Fuck you.”
— Donald

[-] HawlSera@lemm.ee 13 points 3 months ago

Can we stop bullying transpeole now and admit maybe it actually IS Trump that's the problem?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Auli@lemmy.ca 12 points 3 months ago

I mean none of this matters he was popular on one night and that is all that counts.

[-] MyOpinion@lemm.ee 10 points 3 months ago

I wonder why he is doing just like he said he would.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 15 Mar 2025
760 points (100.0% liked)

News

30554 readers
2676 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS