167
submitted 2 days ago by NightOwl@lemmy.ca to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml

There is already a serious problem in modern discourse with the term "independent media," a phrase commonly defined as any media outlet, no matter how big an empire it is, that is not owned or funded by the state (as if that is the only form of dependence or control to which media is subject). But even at this extremely low bar, all these outlets fail. Indeed, Weimers' warning underlines the fact that none of them are independent in any meaningful way. They are, in fact, completely dependent on USAID for their very existence.

Not only that, but some USAID-backed journalists candidly admit that their funding dictates their output and what stories they do and do not cover. Leila Bicakcic, CEO of Center for Investigative Reporting (a USAID-supported Bosnian organization), admitted, on camera, that "If you are funded by the U.S. government, there are certain topics that you would simply not go after, because the U.S. government has its interests that are above all others."

While USAID specifically targets foreign audiences, much of its messaging comes back to America, as those foreign outlets are used as credible, independent, and reliable sources for newspapers or cable news networks to cite. Thus, its bankrolling of foreign media ends up flooding domestic audiences with pro-U.S. messaging as well.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] njm1314@lemmy.world 6 points 21 hours ago

American soft power has been crippled worldwide. You really have to ask yourself when the moderators of Wikipedia are going to go ahead and edit the Cold War page.

[-] mlg@lemmy.world 6 points 22 hours ago

People have been joking about fake as hell NGOs being used for espionage and misinformation for decades, but its weird they they're actually throwing away their leverage across the board.

Unless they plan to just move the funding to another organization like the CIA.

[-] Corgana@startrek.website 6 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

"any media outlet, no matter how big an empire it is, that is not owned or funded by the state" is not the common definition of "independent media" (it's not even the definition given in the hyperlinked definition). "Independence" in this context refers to journalistic independence.

[-] BillWigly@kbin.earth 11 points 1 day ago

the only media i care about is people or outlets supported by small donations from regular people & lots of transparency about their sources. if otherwise, they can go fuck off

[-] coolusername@lemmy.ml 29 points 1 day ago

i love mintpressnews. their links were and probably still are banned on facebook and instagram and probably more places. the great firewall of the US is too good

[-] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 27 points 1 day ago

Their links are banned on .world as well.

[-] Grapho@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 day ago

.stormfront Putting the Fed in fediverse as always.

[-] ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org 11 points 1 day ago

I wonder if they're really that stupid to give up this super-efficient means of soft power over some progressive things they've done or intentionally handing influence in parts of the world to Russia for a bit of money for themselves while taking a calculated risk of maybe having to retake control militarily (which is more costly but could be a problem for the next admin).

[-] Zaleramancer@beehaw.org 5 points 1 day ago

Part of the problem is that sufficient wealth seems to destroy people's understanding of consequence. They don't experience them very often, and so reach a point where they can simply pursue whatever their feelings tell them to do and the world magically restructures itself to allow them to do so.

Combine this with how the incentives of the social system result in the people who are most likely to pursue a selfish course being the most financially successful- you get a recipe for short-sighted, ignorant and self-important nonsense.

[-] ThePiedPooper@discuss.online 16 points 1 day ago

Trump is a Russian agent. It immediately explains everything he does.

[-] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 1 day ago

It's never a good idea to confuse shared class interests with a wacky conspiracy theory.

[-] alkbch@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 day ago

If Trump is indeed a Russian agent, why not make him use the soft power to actually help shift the narrative in favor of Russia?

[-] sleeplessone@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 day ago

Based if true! Death to Amerikkka!

[-] wurzelgummidge@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 day ago

The Russians aren't stupid enough to rely on and big-mouthed idiot like Trump.

[-] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 29 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

An American in America does something stupid in a deeply American way:

BlueAnon liberals: "this is clearly the fault of foreigners!"

[-] ThePiedPooper@discuss.online 5 points 1 day ago

It's hard for me to believe that Occam's Razor applies here. It's hard for me to believe that someone this stupid can become president and think he's doing something good for America.

So he became president to do something bad to America, and he does it in the way Putin says to.

[-] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 22 points 1 day ago

It’s hard for me to believe that Occam’s Razor applies here. It’s hard for me to believe

LOL! Occam's Razor is a universal principle, it applies everywhere. Ohhh but, "it's hard for you to believe", never mind then, clearly let's just reject all reason.

So he became president to do something bad to America, and he does it in the way Putin says to.

Amazing how shitlibs have decided to create their own version of Qanon.

[-] ThePiedPooper@discuss.online 4 points 1 day ago
[-] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 16 points 1 day ago

"Never believe that anti-Semites are completely unaware of the absurdity of their replies. They know that their remarks are frivolous, open to challenge. But they are amusing themselves, for it is their adversary who is obliged to use words responsibly, since he believes in words. The anti-Semites have the right to play. They even like to play with discourse for, by giving ridiculous reasons, they discredit the seriousness of their interlocutors. They delight in acting in bad faith, since they seek not to persuade by sound argument but to intimidate and disconcert. If you press them too closely, they will abruptly fall silent, loftily indicating by some phrase that the time for argument is past."

  • Jean-Paul Sartre
[-] Num10ck@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

Russia isnt that big or powerful, and is much less so today than 2 years ago.

[-] Grapho@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

While it is true that the tail doesn't wag the dog, it's false to claim Russia isn't big and is shrinking.

In terms of GDP PPP it's the 4th biggest economy in the entire world, bigger than Japan. The war has put a dent in their European exports but domestic markets are booming.

[-] queermunist@lemmy.ml 18 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

It doesn't explain his anti-China stance. China is an important economic and civic partner with Russia, it's a very strong relationship.

[-] ThePiedPooper@discuss.online 6 points 1 day ago

It does when you realize that China isn't Russia's partner, it's the dishonest business partner you do business with when you have no other options

[-] queermunist@lemmy.ml 15 points 1 day ago
[-] davel@lemmy.ml 23 points 1 day ago

What? China is the largest trading partner for the great majority of the world. It’s the partner of first resort.

[-] davel@lemmy.ml 18 points 1 day ago
load more comments (6 replies)
[-] davel@lemmy.ml 32 points 2 days ago

Though I’m sure some of them will find new funding through whatever new channels the Trump administration builds.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] TacoButtPlug@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago

Doesn't every government do this?

[-] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 18 points 1 day ago

No? You're not going to find a huge network of propaganda outlets funded by New Zealand, or Botswana, or Ireland, etc.

[-] WanderingVentra@lemm.ee 22 points 1 day ago

Not America, the greatest country in the world according to Lemmy.world, at least they must think that to always uncritically consume their propaganda.

[-] DancingBear@midwest.social 11 points 1 day ago

I don’t usually look at which instance a news article comes from, but in lemmy world I can tell it’s them by the comments. They are a little creepy.

[-] Grapho@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 day ago

.world is if the white dudes from get out had their own instance.

[-] DancingBear@midwest.social 4 points 1 day ago

I used to think people who used the phrase “blue maga” were trolling a little bit, but that’s what they are politically over there. Joe Biden was the only candidate who could win, even when it was obvious that he has dementia or something.

[-] WhatYouNeed@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Yeah but this is a pick on the US post, and that thinking ruins their narrative.

[-] dessalines@lemmy.ml 27 points 1 day ago

Only one country has over 800+ external military bases. The rest of the world combined only has ~20.

The US is easily the most evil country in world history.

[-] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 19 points 1 day ago

It's more that as the World Hegemon, the US' propaganda network is far more extensive and developed, and defunding USAID is exposing that side.

[-] Magnus@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 day ago

Yeah sadly the consolidated the more nefarious regime change part into the state department.

[-] Grapho@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 day ago

Pick on the US? Lmao oh no, the poor widdle fascist empire. Leave the Nazis alone.

[-] satans_methpipe@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

All for-profit media is state run.

[-] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

That's factually innacurate

[-] satans_methpipe@lemmy.world 1 points 19 hours ago

That's factually inaccurate.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 19 Feb 2025
167 points (100.0% liked)

World News

33422 readers
521 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS