874
what debugging regex feels like
(lemmy.ml)
It helps if you break it apart into its component parts. Which is like anything else, really, but we've all accepted that regexes are supposed to run together in an unreadable mess. No reason it has to be that way.
If they are Perl regexes, like all regexes are supposed to be, you can have non-semantic whitespace and comments.
But if you are using some system that enforces something different, you are out of luck.
Not necessarily. For just debugging purposes, you can still break them up to help understand them. Even ignoring that, there are options in languages that don't implement /x.
At my company we store our regex in the database with linebreaks in it, but when it's actually called to be used those line breaks are stripped out. That way regex that looks for X can all be all on one line and actually readable.
wait... why do you have so many regexes you need to put them in a database???
The comments flag needs more support.
I have found chatgpt to be very good at writing regex. I also don't know how to write regex.
In my experience, it is good at simple to medium complexity regex. For the harder ones it starts being quite useless though, at best providing a decent starting point to begin debugging from.
well, you won't get better using chatgpt for it
Just pop them into regex101 or a similar tool, add sample data, see the mistake, fix the mistake, continue to do other stuff.
Just pop them into regex101 or a similar tool, add sample data, ~~see the mistake, fix the mistake, continue to do other stuff.~~ it works there, pull hair
FTFY
Regexr.com is my go-to.
I usually do
# What we are doing (high level)
# Why we need regex
# Regex step by step
# Examples of matches
regex
And I still rewrite it the next time
// abandon all hope ye who commit here
(?:[a-z0-9!#$%&'*+/=?^_`{|}~-]+(?:\.[a-z0-9!#$%&'*+/=?^_`{|}~-]+)*|"(?:[\x01-\x08\x0b\x0c\x0e-\x1f\x21\x23-\x5b\x5d-\x7f]|\\[\x01-\x09\x0b\x0c\x0e-\x7f])*")@(?:(?:[a-z0-9](?:[a-z0-9-]*[a-z0-9])?\.)+[a-z0-9](?:[a-z0-9-]*[a-z0-9])?|\[(?:(?:25[0-5]|2[0-4][0-9]|[01]?[0-9][0-9]?)\.){3}(?:25[0-5]|2[0-4][0-9]|[01]?[0-9][0-9]?|[a-z0-9-]*[a-z0-9]:(?:[\x01-\x08\x0b\x0c\x0e-\x1f\x21-\x5a\x53-\x7f]|\\[\x01-\x09\x0b\x0c\x0e-\x7f])+)\])
Edith: damit, Not the first to post this abomination
I haven't laughed so hard in a month. Thank you for that.
Never debug regex, just generate a new one. It's not worth the hassle to figure out not only what it does, but what it was meant to do.
Better yet, just write it out in code, and never use regex. Tis a stupid thing that never should have been made.
Hard disagree. The function regex serves in programs like Notepad++ can't be easily replaced by "writing it out in code". With a very small number of characters you can get complex search patterns and capturing groups. It's hard to read but incredibly useful.
Can't upvote twice, have a low effort comment instead
I fall in the abandon it camp. Code is read way more times than it is written. I'd rather read an algorithm that validates input than read a regex that validates input.
You're discussing a completely different use case from what I said. RegEx can be increidbly useful but it's not always the only/best option.
load more comments
(10 replies)
Regex is a write only language.
I love regex and I use it a lot, but I very rarely use it in any kind of permanent solution. When I do, I make sure to keep it as minimal as possible, supplementing with higher level programming where possible. Backreferences and assertions are a cardinal sin and should never be used.
Me checking my own docs: "this is some voodoo shit, idk how it works"
Downvoted so that everyone can know I'm cool since I understand regex better than the idiot who made that meme.
I know I'm weird, but I love regex.
If I have a complex regular expression to code into my app, I write it in pomsky, then copy paste the compiled regex to my source file, but also keep the pomsky source nearby. Much more maintainable.
There are a few online regex testing tools that will analyse your efforts and give you the opportunity to provide sample data.
Aziz! LIGHT!
Ohhhhh it was this extra '
There are no bugs, it's just not doing what you expect it to be doing...
... which, now that I think of it, can be said about all software in general.
awk-ward
I think he found the Road Runner.
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 14 Feb 2025
874 points (100.0% liked)
Programmer Humor
24373 readers
681 users here now
Welcome to Programmer Humor!
This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!
For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.
Rules
- Keep content in english
- No advertisements
- Posts must be related to programming or programmer topics
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS