188
top 47 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] double_quack@lemm.ee 70 points 4 weeks ago

We all know where this is gonna end...

[-] Fandangalo@lemmy.world 44 points 4 weeks ago

Surveillance drones everywhere.

[-] double_quack@lemm.ee 40 points 4 weeks ago

Surveillance is the "nice" version of it.

[-] Fandangalo@lemmy.world 24 points 4 weeks ago
[-] double_quack@lemm.ee 7 points 4 weeks ago

Exactly! Flying, they are flying everywheeeaaahhhh!

[-] Fandangalo@lemmy.world 13 points 4 weeks ago
[-] adarza@lemmy.ca 10 points 4 weeks ago
[-] jaemo@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 weeks ago

Yeah I was gonna say like why are we even workshopping the name with a winner like that. Get this employee a bonus check!

[-] Iheartcheese@lemmy.world 2 points 4 weeks ago

Neat a dildo and 4 rotating nipple toys

[-] Thrashy@lemmy.world 11 points 4 weeks ago

I've low-key started to think the only reason we haven't seen autonomous hunter-killer drones yet is that nobody's willing to break the seal, and I'm scared for what happens when somebody finally does.

[-] double_quack@lemm.ee 22 points 4 weeks ago

My dear stranger, those already exist, and have been used in war to terminate key individuals.

We are living the dream.

[-] metaStatic@kbin.earth 20 points 4 weeks ago

key individuals

Such as Palestinian children

[-] Thrashy@lemmy.world 8 points 4 weeks ago

Point me towards systems that don't have a human in the loop, particularly any that utilize fully-autonomous swarms, and I'll agree. Scary as the former are, there's a world of difference between a handful of FPV suicide drones, and a cloud of HL2-Manhack-esque things operating on face-recogniton-guided autopilot.

[-] double_quack@lemm.ee 10 points 4 weeks ago

Oh, that's what you mean... yeah, there are humans behind, but potato potato, swap one brain for another... anyway it is a killing machine that can get you anywhere in the planet.

[-] mosiacmango@lemm.ee 2 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

The humans are using ai to pick the targets they kill anyway. They theoretically are supposed to parse out the bad targets, but we know from examples listed in the above, that for genocidal states like Israel, that review is intentionally ignored or minimized.

[-] Erasmus@lemmy.world 5 points 4 weeks ago

Horizon Zero Dawn looking more eminent any day now.

[-] skulblaka@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 weeks ago

They are definitely super willing to break the seal, just nobody has built a good target ID system yet that won't fire on civilians.

If you just need everyone in a 10 mile radius dead, you could send in the hunter bots, or you could just shell the area with heavy artillery from three countries away. We already have that problem solved. Once we have a reliable target ID system I guarantee you'll start seeing unmanned equipment in war.

[-] Infernal_pizza@lemm.ee 3 points 4 weeks ago

#BugsArentReal

[-] Docus@lemmy.world 1 points 4 weeks ago

There is no way these things could spread poison instead of pollen is there?

[-] Doorbook@lemmy.world 50 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

In the latest video about this by veritasium, he asked the researcher about ethics concern. the researcher insist that they dont care as humanity can decide for itself.

Meanwhile:

The new report also details the extent of MIT’s partnerships with Israeli military contractors like Elbit Systems, which supplies 85 percent of Israel’s killer drones, and Maersk, one of the world’s largest shipping companies, that has sent millions of pounds of military goods to Israel since the start of the war on Gaza. The Israeli military also sponsored several of the MIT projects with funds provided by the U.S. Defense Department.

https://theintercept.com/2025/01/16/mit-israel-military-funding-research-gaza/

[-] shoo@lemmy.world 14 points 4 weeks ago

That researcher is a real life Dr. Hoenikker. Vonnegut is probably shrugging in his grave

[-] Sammy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

-…his mother was completely consumed by robotic bees. So it goes.

[-] remer@lemmy.world 11 points 4 weeks ago

“We are willing to ignore and downplay the ethical concerns as long as the money keeping coming in”

[-] MisterNeon@lemmy.world 44 points 4 weeks ago

I'd rather just have bees.

[-] ploot 27 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

But how can techbros get rich from bees? Bees just make themselves for free then serve the greater good, the little buzzing communists.

[-] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 10 points 4 weeks ago

Even birds are starting to seem acceptable

[-] neons@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 4 weeks ago

oh so you think birds aren't already flying robots? robot bees are just the next step.

/s obviously

[-] MonkeyTown@midwest.social 2 points 4 weeks ago

I’d rather not have robot bees. I’ve seen hated in the nation (black mirror episode).

[-] Cocodapuf@lemmy.world 4 points 4 weeks ago

The MIT engineers agree. They said something to the effect of "If you could make a robotic bee, it wouldn't replace bees. It would be a terrible idea to try to use them for pollination... Just put that same amount of finding into conservation and researching bees, you would have a much better result."

[-] PiJiNWiNg@sh.itjust.works 21 points 4 weeks ago

Because developing a replacement for bees is certainly a better solution then saving the bees...

[-] floofloof@lemmy.ca 4 points 4 weeks ago

They think there will be more profit in it, especially since bees can't be repurposed as weapons.

[-] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)
[-] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

Dear technology under capitalism... We just want healthcare, housing, etc... We don't fucking need swarms of robot insects.

[-] balder1991@lemmy.world 3 points 4 weeks ago

Just today I was watching this video:

How we came to hate technology

[-] Adulated_Aspersion@lemmy.world 16 points 4 weeks ago

I've seen this episode of Black Mirror.

[-] Dicska@lemmy.world 1 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

Fall into me

And drown inside me

I know you will see

The beauty of me

Also, I've seen this episode of Tom Scott.

[-] Someplaceunknown@fedia.io 11 points 4 weeks ago

Nope, I’m out

[-] Zier@fedia.io 7 points 4 weeks ago

It wont be long now before the nanobots exist and the Borg can finally take over. Resistance is futile.

[-] prole 1 points 4 weeks ago

the Borg

Sounds like communism...

[-] tunetardis@lemmy.ca 6 points 4 weeks ago

How's this for an obscure reference? This reminded me of an episode of Max Headroom in which the wunderkind Bryce invented a robotic fly with a spycam that could be used to literally bug a room. They send it on a mission to uncover an evil plot and everyone is excitedly crowded around the screen and heaping praise on it. Then it manages to sneak into the evil lair where it promptly gets swatted, leaving Bryce shocked and devastated.

[-] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 5 points 4 weeks ago

They also did this in Spy Kids

[-] JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works 6 points 4 weeks ago

Looks like they hovered for 1000 seconds. It was previously stress limited such that the joints would break after just a few seconds. I think they might still be tethered for a power source, I haven't seen any of these micro flapping bots include a battery yet, and they didn't mention that they did.

https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/scirobotics.adp4256

[-] Maeve@kbin.earth 4 points 4 weeks ago

Bradbury called it in Farahenheit 451.

[-] Drusas@fedia.io 1 points 4 weeks ago

I think there was an X-Files episode about this.

this post was submitted on 11 Feb 2025
188 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

66067 readers
4300 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS