1200
submitted 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) by Blaze@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/leopardsatemyface@lemmy.world

Tiktok video: https://www.tiktok.com/@cattlemenfamilyfarms/video/7467698017559170350

Bsky post: https://bsky.app/profile/thetnholler.bsky.social/post/3lhrdl5nt222s

Articles:

spoiler

ft.com US farmers ‘prepare for the worst’ in new Trump trade war Guy Chazan 7–9 minutes

Aaron Lehman’s soyabean farm in the heartland of Iowa feels like an oasis of calm in the turbulence and tumult of President Donald Trump’s second term. Yet all that could change in a matter of weeks.

Lehman is bracing himself for the impact of a potential trade war hatched in Washington that he says could lay low the US corn belt and irreparably harm America’s standing with its neighbours.

“Farmers understand that trading relationships go up on a stairway, where you work hard to build them up, but go down on an elevator — very, very fast,” Lehman said in the living room of his farmhouse about 20 miles north of Iowa’s capital Des Moines.

“The long-term effect is that countries around the world will no longer see us as a reliable partner.”

It has been a turbulent week in US trade policy. Trump announced last weekend that he would impose 25 per cent tariffs on Mexico and Canada, saying they were not doing enough to stem the flow of migrants and the illicit drug fentanyl into the US. Then after last-minute talks with the two countries’ leaders, he agreed to give them both a 30-day reprieve.

The same was not the case for China. The 10 per cent levy he imposed on all Chinese imports still stands. And many in Iowa believe it is only a matter of time before the tariffs on America’s northern and southern neighbours are reinstated.

The opening salvo of a new trade war has sent a chill through the Midwest. Canada, Mexico and China together account for half of all American agricultural exports. Just last year, the US sold more than $30bn in farm products to Mexico, $29bn to Canada and $26bn to China, according to American Farm Bureau statistics.

Suddenly, farmers were facing the spectre of retaliatory tariffs and the prospect of a full-scale conflict that some fear could decimate America’s rural heartland. Two large grain silos and an old shed sit on a dry, grassy area with expansive flat fields in the background under a partly cloudy sky Farmers fear a full-scale trade war could decimate America’s rural heartland © Amir Prellberg/FT

Farmers in an area of the country that has become a bedrock of support for Trump now worry that the president’s tariffs, though suspended at the last minute, have permanently damaged the image of the US in the eyes of its most important trading partners.

“We’ve gone from being a seller of choice to a seller of last resort,” said Mark Mueller, a farmer from near Waterloo in north-east Iowa.

Few US states better embody the agricultural wealth of the Midwest than Iowa. It is a land of vast corn fields stretching as far as the eye can see, the landscape broken by the occasional grain silo, hay bale or low-slung barn. Hogs outnumber people more than seven to one.

It is also Trump country. Although Iowa voted for Democratic presidents Bill Clinton and Barack Obama, it backed Trump in 2016, 2020 and 2024 in ever greater numbers.

More than a fifth of Iowa’s economy — or $53.1bn — is tied to agriculture, from crop and livestock production to food processing and manufacturing. It is the country’s largest producer of corn, hogs, eggs and ethanol and a top-three grower of soyabeans. That makes it particularly vulnerable to any downturn in agricultural exports.

“Free trade is the backbone of the economy in the Midwest,” said Ernie Goss, an economist at Creighton University in Omaha, Nebraska. “What we have here is some of the most productive agriculture on the face of the Earth, and the domestic market is not even close to being big enough to absorb all the commodities produced here. You have to have international markets.” Aaron Lehman is seated near a window inside a room, wearing glasses and a checkered shirt ‘The long-term effect is that countries around the world will no longer see us as a reliable partner,’ said Aaron Lehman © Amir Prellberg/FT

The latest volley of tariff threats has evoked painful memories of the trade war unleashed by Trump in his first term. Among the most striking moves was Trump imposing duties on $300bn of Chinese goods. Beijing responded in 2018 by slapping 25 per cent tariffs on imports of US soyabeans, beef, pork, wheat, corn and sorghum.

The skirmish ended with the countries signing a trade deal in 2020 under which Beijing pledged to increase its purchases of US goods and services. But since then, it has been buying more grain from countries such as Argentina and Brazil, which overtook the US as China’s top supplier of corn in 2023.

In the last trade war, “a lot of our Asian buyers started developing relationships with soyabean producers in South America, and they’ve taken more and more of our market”, said Lehman, who is also president of the Iowa Farmers Union. “And we haven’t got it back.”

Not all of Iowa’s farmers oppose the way Trump has used the threat of tariffs to achieve a key policy objective — stemming illegal immigration.

“It was a strategy he needed to use to . . . get those countries to the negotiating table,” said Steve Kuiper, a fourth-generation Iowa farmer who grows corn and soyabeans in Marion County, south-east of Des Moines. After all, “a president has just four years to accomplish all he’s promised to do, so he’s got to get things going immediately to gain traction”.

Still, he is pessimistic that Mexico and Canada will be able to deliver on their pledges to Trump to strengthen border security in time. “It takes forever for these things to happen, and they’ve only got 30 days,” he said. A view through a window shows a barren soybean field The latest volley of tariff threats has evoked painful memories of the trade war unleashed by Donald Trump in his first term © Amir Prellberg/FT

The prospect of another round of trade tensions comes with American farmers already in a tight spot, hit by a fall in crop prices and higher costs. Net farm income, a broad measure of profits, was $181.9bn in 2022 but is projected to have been $140.7bn in 2024, according to data from the US Department of Agriculture — a 23 per cent slump.

“This [trade war] isn’t coming at a good time,” said Rick Juchems, a farmer from near Plainfield in north-east Iowa. “Commodity prices are low and the price of inputs like seed and fertiliser is going up.” Sources from the Iowa Corn Growers Association said many farmers had been producing at a $100 per acre loss.

Investments in new equipment are down, reflecting the wider downturn, said Juchems. “I’ve got friends who’ve lost their jobs selling agricultural machinery because of reduced demand. The lots are full of unsold tractors.”

Makers of farm equipment such as Deere, Kinze Manufacturing and Bridgestone/Firestone have shed hundreds of jobs in Iowa since last year.

Yet the prospects for farm finances could get even gloomier if Trump makes good on his threat of import levies. Fertiliser, for example, could become much more expensive, since more than 80 per cent of the US’s supply of potash — a key ingredient — comes from Canada.

But perhaps the most destructive effect of the tariff debate is the uncertainty it has triggered, just ahead of the crucial spring planting season.

“We’ll get by as long as we know what’s coming,” said Juchems. “But things are changing all the time. I’m sure the whole world is laughing at us.”

Lehman said farmers were trying to stay optimistic. “They tell me they’re hopeful cooler heads will prevail and this dispute will result in good trade agreements,” said Lehman. “But they’re also preparing for the worst.”

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Punchshark@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 hour ago

Can't fix stupid! I bet he supports getting rid of the Dept of Education too! Fucking idiot!

Buy the ticket, take the ride!

[-] the_q@lemm.ee 4 points 1 hour ago

the Price is Right failure horn plays

[-] Opisek@lemmy.world 19 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

Must be the 50th such post I've seen in the past 7 days. Would people now vote differently if there was an election tomorrow or are they incapable of learning from their mistakes?

[-] JoeBigelow@lemmy.ca 16 points 3 hours ago

You know the fucking answer to that as well as I do. They voted for hate and would do it again.

[-] Theonetheycall1845@lemmy.world 4 points 1 hour ago

Yea but not hate towards us! Signed, some white people

[-] JuxtaposedJaguar@lemmy.ml 7 points 3 hours ago

Republicans would shit in their own pants just to make Liberals smell it.

[-] joekar1990@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago

The guy blamed Bidens government and not Trump in his video so no. He'd probably vote the same.

[-] Bytemeister@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago

This is probably the 3rd time he's voted for Trump.

[-] Prior_Industry@lemmy.world 23 points 6 hours ago

Why do they always get into their car / truck to panic?

[-] boonhet@lemm.ee 20 points 4 hours ago

Honestly, maybe so the family doesn't see, while they can gather composure. A little bit of "men don't cry" and a little bit of "don't want the family to all have heart attacks before I know for sure"

[-] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 3 points 3 hours ago

Maybe acoustics too. But at this point it's just part of the right wing grift asthetic.

[-] Bytemeister@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago

It's big strong frame, imposing physique makes them feel respected, and it's supple, soft and warm seats make them feel loved. Why wouldn't you rant in your 80k emotional support vehicle?

[-] Shapillon@lemmy.world 8 points 6 hours ago

It's a small room where you're usually alone?

[-] mavu@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 4 hours ago

Well, to that i can only say a heartfelt

.|..

[-] ours@lemmy.world 35 points 9 hours ago

New York real-estate and South African tech billionaires don't actually care about the working man?

Who could have forseen such a turn of events???

[-] prinzmegahertz@lemm.ee 19 points 9 hours ago

If you make a deal with the devil, you should not be suprised if you have to pay your due

[-] ours@lemmy.world 25 points 9 hours ago

This isn't even a monkey's pawn kind of deal. They get nothing at all in return.

At least the devil delivers on mad guitar-playing skills before taking your soul.

[-] leadore@lemmy.world 35 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

re: first 2 links: Notice he never mentions, blames or criticizes Trump. It's "the government" doing this to him.

[-] derpgon@programming.dev 1 points 1 hour ago

Wonder who is the de-facto head of the government, who we elect every 4 years, and is a singular person, and has (and used) the executive power to defund all the programs.

Yeee, we might never know...

[-] Whateley@lemm.ee 49 points 19 hours ago

"The whole world is laughing at us."

No, they're laughing at Trump voters. The rest of us they just feel sorry for.

load more comments (9 replies)
[-] iAvicenna@lemmy.world 56 points 19 hours ago

I don't think I will ever get tired of this:

[-] josefo@leminal.space 20 points 17 hours ago

Votes for Leopard, gets face eaten.

[-] JuxtaposedJaguar@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 hours ago

I got banned from Hexbear for saying that. Apparently I’m a fascist for wanting Trump voters to get their just deserts.

[-] SLVRDRGN@lemmy.world 77 points 21 hours ago

To be honest, I have never understood why the "average joe" ever identified with Trump, whose whole point is that he is a "successful" billionaire businessman. Why they believe he's looking out for the little guy is beyond me.

[-] commander@lemmings.world 4 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

I have never understood why the “average joe” ever identified with Trump

A major reason for the vehement support the right receives is trying to control what people can say.

The left has itself to blame for its overreaching censorship in online spaces for why so many people feel more comfortable being part of the right.

You can't just tell the "average joe" that a man is a woman and vice-versa, then ban him for saying otherwise and expect him to stay on your side.

[-] highduc@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 hours ago

I think you're right but no one wants to hear it. Everyone's extremely polarized and people seem to be happy to point the finger and say "you voted wrong" with smug arrogance. I bet a lot of Trump voters felt like they didn't have a better choice.

[-] muelltonne@feddit.org 5 points 6 hours ago

Can you explain what you mean with "censorship in online spaces from the left"? As far as I know, most of our digital infrastructure is in the hand of MAGA right wing billionaires (X, Facebook, Instagram) and other people who are not really known as left (Reddit, TikTok, Google/YouTube). Most of our big social networks are not doing any left wing censorship. YouTube will demonitize you when you swear enough, because advertisers don't like that. Musk will censor you when you disagree with his politics. Trump will fire you if you mention certain words. But that is right wing censorship. So where are those spaces where the left is censoring everything that are pushing people to vote for the right?

[-] commander@lemmings.world 3 points 5 hours ago

You can’t just tell the “average joe” that a man is a woman and vice-versa, then ban him for saying otherwise and expect him to stay on your side.

[-] Fluke@lemm.ee 4 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

You think everyone is a transphobic bigot and that's what swayed the vote?

There's no helping people like you.

[-] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 6 hours ago

I think people are reacting mainly emotionally (i.e. "I feel that this person can be trusted") rather than doing any meaningful level of political analysis and that the attraction of many for confident loudmouth politicians is in part a reaction to a couple of decades of being swindled by soft speaking slippery suits on both sides of the isle.

(Politically Aware people - which I imagine most of us here are - tend to expect from others similar levels of being well informed about Politics and thinking it to be important, when in reality most people do not think, care or are as well informed about politics anywhere as much as the Politically Aware)

These things come in cycles and we're back in the age when people are over-saturated with the "sophisticated misdirection and half-truth deceiver" type of swindler whilst not being innured to the "loud and brash liar" type of swindler, because the last couple of decades have been dominated in politics by the former kind of manipulator whilst the last time the latter type was dominant was almost a century ago.

That's my theory.

load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 10 Feb 2025
1200 points (100.0% liked)

Leopards Ate My Face

4152 readers
2031 users here now

Rules:

Also feel free to check out !leopardsatemyface@lemm.ee (also active).

Icon credit C. Brück on Wikimedia Commons.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS