479
It’s fine, it’s not like he’s going to be disappointed if she makes him sleep on the couch.
Vance’s mental gymnastics are Olympic-tier. Defending a Musk aide who posted “Normalize Indian hate” while married to an Indian woman? Unreal. The man’s moral compass isn’t broken—it’s been sold to the highest bidder.
Elez’s reinstatement is a joke. Racist posts aren’t youthful indiscretions; they’re neon signs of character. But Musk’s Twitter poll governance strikes again, proving that bigotry is just another day at the office for his empire of chaos.
Ro Khanna’s right to call him out. Vance’s dismissal isn’t just cowardice—it’s complicity. If your principles can’t withstand a paycheck or a poll, you don’t have any to begin with.
My sisters just like her, I promise you, shes on his side hating indians, self haters fr.
Public poll online... lol. You can buy likes, followers and poll votes at the drop of a hat. Even easier if you happen to run a certain network...
Surprise surprise, the guy who cozies up to racists to get ahead in life won’t push back against said racists, even to defend his own family.
is it really cucking if he fucks the cuck chair instead of watching
I thought that it was the Cuck Couch?
He’s an equal opportunity furniture cucker.
His Indian kids are reaching that age when they either realize he's a hateful insufferable piece of shit, OR they themselves become spoiled rich assholes with no moral compass and live off the griff.
One cannot betray what one does not possess.
Right. So if I have he/him in my email signature I get fired. But if i have hugely racist and problematic tweets that are less than a year old while having almost no experience or credentials whatsoever other than being a little buddy buddy with Musk I get to push out dangerous untested code to the most important payment system in the country so musk can block social security benefits for Grandma like he blocks tweets talking about how terrible a father he is. Got it.
By the looks of him, he wasn't getting any from his wife a while ago.
JD Vance is clearly gay and can't admit it to himself, which is why he's married to a woman he clearly doesn't love, AKA, a Beard.
I don't know. How can you be that gay if you are so bad at eye liner?
Oh don't get all up in arms about the honor of usha Vance here. She is a Republican too and voted for these neo Nazis into office along with the other neo Nazis.
There's no honor to defend here, she's one of them.
Usha Vance comes from one of the richest most powerful castes in India, Kamma, so she was raised on an idea that she has some innate genetic superiority that makes her feel right at home with white supremacists.
I don't know the cast system in india, but I've seen this sort of behavior a lot from immigrants. Specifically those that "came legally", and hate other immigrants and think themselves superior to other immigrants and blk/ltno people here. They think they are same as wt people because they are "elite" from their area of origin. And many times they justify this racist behavior from current gov by comparing similar racist stereotypes they have from their place of origin. They just moved country, they were racist, now there are people who are racist to them, but they still look down at others instead of standing united.
Sorry for bad abbreviation, kinda don't wanna leave words for it to be flagged somewhere by someone in future and tracked back.
It's so sad because if you look at their resumes, Usha Vance is actually much more accomplished than her husband. Peter Thiel just prefers JD, I guess.
Peter Thiel just prefers JD, I guess.
Probably because of the penis.
Looks like someone is sleeping on the couch.
She's on board with this. She's as racist as he is. Until she becomes the "wrong kind of brown person," and I hope it's too late for her at that point.
Nah, she knew what she married.
Wrong preposition lol
*with
Nah, she knows that would be a reward not a punishment lmao
^ Came here to say this.
🤣
🛋️ 💦 🍆
tfw you're a woman maga voter and realize the only reason you exist to them is to make sammiches in the times between getting fucked
Musk backed Elez after a public poll
Was that 'public poll' done on twitter? Im sure that was fairly conducted.
JD, the vice president, completely disappears for months at a time and imply pops up to be a racist prick and throw his family under the bus
"Yea, but not my wife, she's one of the 'good' ones!" - JD, in his mind
His wife has the same attitude or she would have divorced him.
Well, it’s obvious this man just hates his wife.
These fuckers don't have a concept of honour.
man yeah! fetishization is a pattern of hate. he does not love his wife for who she is. he does lot engage with issues of discrimination she experiences and try to mitigate them from a place of loving her as a fellow human. quite the opposite, in fact. to him she is a sexual status symbol and nothing more. and either she knows that and rolls with it because feMAGAle voters are lapdogs selling out their sisters for temporary comfort, or she's deeply embedded in a system of hate that becomes invisible to you when it's normalized by everyone who's around you. in other words she either knows and just grifts on him to do her scams like melania does, or she's so broken by the hegemony she doesn't know it's possible for your husband to love you.
but anyone's who's surprised doesn't know who these people are
The joke just writes itself!
Vance is gonna destroy that settee in the den tonight. For a whole 20 seconds.
Men this powerful have to have guiding principles. Hate above all else. You can't compromise.
Who'd believe that complete cunts would act like complete cunts, like they do every single time?
Didn’t say hate couches
Does Vance love couches more than his wife?
this post was submitted on 08 Feb 2025
479 points (100.0% liked)
politics
19885 readers
2749 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS