641

Summary

Trump evicted former Coast Guard Commandant Linda Fagan from her military housing with just three hours' notice, despite an earlier 60-day waiver.

Fagan, the first woman to lead a military branch, was dismissed on Trump's second day in office over concerns about DEI policies and border security.

Homeland Security officials cited her termination as justification, though sources called it a "petty" move.

Fagan was forced to leave most belongings behind, spending the night with friends while awaiting relocation of her personal items.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] MapleEngineer@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago

MAGA has a hardon for cruelty. It's about hurting people.

[-] loudiamond@lemm.ee 107 points 2 days ago

the sheer amount of my taxpayer dollars that will go into lawsuit settlements over the next 20 years is infuriating

[-] ripcord@lemmy.world 19 points 2 days ago

Why do you think any lawsuits for any of these things would actually get anywhere at this point?

[-] loudiamond@lemm.ee 26 points 2 days ago

The repercussions of this administration will be going on for decades

[-] Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee 7 points 1 day ago

Dude, he appointed three supreme court judges. They are young as hell and will cause hell for 35 to 40 years at least. This is what he did without a second term.

With a second term we might see repercussions and hell probably until the very late 21st. This is assuming it stops with him.

Hmm.

Nope. Can't see any work arounds to lifetime appointments.

[-] ripcord@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago

Right but you seem to be inferring that the totalitarianism sweeping the nation at the moment will just go away or something, and lawsuits on things like this will actually be a thing in, say, 10 years.

[-] kava@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago

yeah this is just the start. it's gonna get progressively worse until inevitably the system blows up. that could take decades. i'm guessing it culminates in some sort of unwinnable war

[-] Jarix@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago

New tax on billion dollar entities or higher scaling exponentially for every additional zero , make them pay it. Government should spend money, on the people for the people and by the people

[-] Absaroka@lemmy.world 124 points 2 days ago

Getting fired because you're a woman, with reasoning that seems to boil down to "we don't think a woman can do this job," sounds like a pretty good case for a wrongful, discriminatory firing suit.

[-] __nobodynowhere@sh.itjust.works 39 points 2 days ago

4/9 of the supreme court are women. When are they going to go?

[-] Quadhammer@lemmy.world 24 points 2 days ago

At least 1 black guy to my knowledge too

[-] CptEnder@lemmy.world 33 points 2 days ago

We don't count that Uncle Tom mother fucker

[-] djsoren19 1 points 1 day ago

Why not, his ass should absolutely be out of a job, and one of those women should be too.

[-] vonbaronhans@midwest.social 5 points 2 days ago

Fascists will still count him if his knee doesn't bend enough.

[-] Venutianxspring@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 2 days ago

You guys need to remember the real constitution that our oligarchy follows "Rules for thee, not for me"

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Kalysta@lemm.ee 7 points 2 days ago

They just put an asshole in charge of the EEOC who doesn’t believe this is discrimination. Who would enforce a judgement even if they won?

[-] ploot 168 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

I guess her crime was to try to employ more people who weren't cishet white men. Unforgivable to the fascists in charge. And anyway, they just get off on cruelty because it distracts them from the emptiness inside.

[-] halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world 122 points 3 days ago

Given their recent demand that NASA remove information about "women in leadership", it paints a pretty clear picture of why she was fired. Nothing to do with capability, competence, or any issues with her command.

[-] horse_battery_staple@lemmy.world 159 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Margaret fucking Hamilton, got us to the moon.

[-] chase_what_matters@lemmy.world 72 points 3 days ago

For those not in the know:

Here, Margaret is shown standing beside listings of the software developed by her and the team she was in charge of, the LM [lunar module] and CM [command module] on-board flight software team.

https://science.nasa.gov/people/margaret-hamilton/

[-] GraniteM@lemmy.world 16 points 2 days ago

For those confused and thinking that the Wicked Witch of the West was somehow aging backwards after faking her death and escaping from Oz:

[-] iamanurd@midwest.social 2 points 1 day ago

Your name is correct

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Kalysta@lemm.ee 3 points 2 days ago

It’s almost like Hegseth was lying when he said he respected women in the military.

[-] Drusas@fedia.io 61 points 3 days ago

Her crime was being a woman to begin with.

[-] datendefekt@feddit.org 38 points 2 days ago

Have you seen the list of flagged words for federal grants? It includes "female" and "woman", but not "man" or "male".

https://mastodon.social/@Lazarou/113943275616933776

[-] ploot 19 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Here's the list of words that will now get your scientific publication flagged for ideological review:

  • activism
  • activists
  • advocacy
  • advocate
  • advocates
  • barrier
  • barriers
  • biased
  • biased toward
  • biases
  • biases towards
  • bipoc
  • black and latinx
  • community diversity
  • community equity
  • cultural differences
  • cultural heritage
  • culturally responsive
  • disabilities
  • disability
  • discriminated
  • discrimination
  • discriminatory
  • diverse backgrounds
  • diverse communities
  • diverse community
  • diverse group
  • diverse groups
  • diversified
  • diversify
  • diversifying
  • diversity and inclusion
  • diversity equity
  • enhance the diversity
  • enhancing diversity
  • equal opportunity
  • equality
  • equitable
  • equity
  • ethnicity
  • excluded
  • female
  • females
  • fostering inclusivity
  • gender
  • gender diversity
  • genders
  • hate speech
  • excluded
  • female
  • females
  • fostering inclusivity
  • gender
  • gender diversity
  • genders
  • hate speech
  • hispanic minority
  • historically
  • implicit bias
  • implicit biases
  • inclusion
  • inclusive
  • inclusiveness
  • inclusivity
  • increase diversity
  • increase the diversity
  • indigenous community
  • inequalities
  • inequality
  • inequitable
  • inequities
  • institutional
  • Igbt
  • marginalize
  • marginalized
  • minorities
  • minority
  • multicultural
  • polarization
  • political
  • prejudice
  • privileges
  • promoting diversity
  • race and ethnicity
  • racial
  • racial diversity
  • racial inequality
  • racial justice
  • racially
  • racism
  • sense of belonging
  • sexual preferences
  • social justice
  • sociocultural
  • socioeconomic
  • status
  • stereotypes
  • systemic
  • trauma
  • under appreciated
  • under represented
  • under served
  • underrepresentation
  • underrepresented
  • underserved
  • undervalued
  • victim
  • women
  • women and underrepresented

The List of Trump’s Forbidden Words That Will Get Your Paper Flagged at NSF

[-] tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip 9 points 2 days ago

Great, now science is gonna have to start sounding like people avoiding social media filters.

"In my report, we examine how nonmen and oppomajorities are unscriminated against.."

[-] Kalysta@lemm.ee 5 points 2 days ago

Victim? So no more funding into crime research then.

We live in the stupidest timeline. May Trump’s reign be very short.

[-] datendefekt@feddit.org 3 points 1 day ago

There are so many words in that list that are either general use or widely applicable in so many fields, it's crazy. Some fields popping off the top of my head.

  • barrier: biology, as in the blood-brain barrier. Or engineering, economics,
  • biases: AI, psychology
  • disabilities: medicine, sociology
  • diversified: finance
  • excluded: just about anything
  • female: electronics, engineering, as in female connectors or receptacles
  • gender: biology
  • historically: also just about anything
  • status: just about anything, but a lot in IT and engineering
  • systemic: biology, medicine
  • trauma: medicine
  • under represented: anything with statistics

This is just getting me depressed.

[-] anomnom@sh.itjust.works 16 points 2 days ago

They papered over all the female and black peoples at the NSA Museum too. A bunch of former NSA has to go complain for them to uncover it. They claim it was to “act fast” to keep from being defunded.

Elon would have been arrested in any other circumstance for this behavior. We’re fucked.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] aarRJaay@lemm.ee 74 points 2 days ago

Is he literally saying "Girls can't do that job, that's a job for a man"?

[-] ButtDrugs@lemm.ee 35 points 2 days ago
[-] Ghosthacked@lemm.ee 58 points 2 days ago

The left needs to learn how to "Speak softly and carry a big stick."

Speaking softly alone gets you fucking nowhere. This is why the far right gains so much ground. They know the DNC and the apparatus of the left is toothless. All they do is browbeat.

Get.some.fucking.teeth.

If the DNC cannot bite back, it needs to die or else ethnic cleansing and genocide is inevitable in this country.

[-] Kitathalla@lemy.lol 18 points 2 days ago

The little person, too, needs to learn to just say no. Make them push it farther. Fight back and get pyrrhic victories.

I'm guessing this was on a military base, so the usual eviction shit doesn't apply, but remember that in civilian life, until law enforcement shows up with a court order in hand, anyone removing you from your house is breaking criminal law.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] OhStopYellingAtMe@lemmy.world 90 points 3 days ago

They’re bullies. They get off on acting like this.

[-] UpperBroccoli 32 points 2 days ago

over concerns

No.

[-] SinningStromgald@lemmy.world 56 points 3 days ago

Do higher ups like her get better movers than enlisted? Because I have heard horror stories about the state of objects after military moving companies get ahold of them.

[-] horse_battery_staple@lemmy.world 35 points 3 days ago

That first move was fucking rough. I was so relieved until I walked into my living room full of dented cardboard boxes. Never again. I opened up a dented box of dishes I had packed meticulously and wrapped in bubble wrap. Ate off of chipped plates for a couple weeks before I had time to replace them....I couldn't fucking imagine using them when I had actually valuable shit.

I got a buncha other grunts to help me move the next time. The fucking butter bar that was watching us move my shit into the new place was all "Why didn't you just use United? Command pays for them. Waste of money. You grunts never learn." I politely asked him if he'd had them move him in. "Well uh no. We're paid better than to need that." Lol

Come to find out the crews that work the government jobs get the worst pay and are often stiffed on tips because command never tell the enlisted to fucking tip. So yeah, they'll happily fuck up your shit to get the job over ASAP and move on to a better paying civvie job. And to be honest I can't really blame em. Especially now with Elon saying the Government isn't gonna pay contractors anymore.

[-] deranger@sh.itjust.works 24 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

You’re not supposed to tip military movers, it’s in the instructions you’re provided.

My wife and I just recently moved using military movers and all our stuff is fine. She’s a captain (the O3 kind).

Both teams of people were professionals and we didn’t lose anything to theft or damage. Maybe we just got lucky, idk. My experience as lower enlisted having government movers pack up my shit in Italy to move back to the states was similar back in 2014 though. Never had an issue.

load more comments (27 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[-] pyre@lemmy.world 35 points 2 days ago

almost there

[-] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Serving a violent, racist, patriarchical empire isn't all that it's cracked up to be.

[-] HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com 39 points 3 days ago

Class fucking act. Man I get the problems folks had with Obama but class, dignity, just fucking cool. I yearn for those times.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 06 Feb 2025
641 points (100.0% liked)

politics

19885 readers
2753 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS