535

Summary

Elon Musk warned federal employees against leaking information, stating, “if in doubt, they are out,” as he helps Trump implement sweeping government changes.

A Reddit post alleged Musk’s team is using “fingerprinting” tactics to track leakers. Musk, who spent heavily on Trump’s re-election, now leads the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), which has controversially seized control of federal payment and personnel systems.

The administration is also encouraging civil servants to resign, prompting lawsuits.

Whistleblower protections may challenge Musk’s crackdown on leaks.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net 26 points 20 hours ago

He's gonna fire you anyway, leak harder.

[-] lori@lemmy.zip 3 points 11 hours ago

Seriously they're going to fire just about everyone. It's not much of a threat.

[-] Sabata11792@ani.social 45 points 23 hours ago

Musk threatens to illegally fire employees he is already illegally firing.

[-] Nunar@lemmy.world 60 points 1 day ago

This dipshit has no authority! What the actual fuck is happening?

[-] SVcross@lemmy.world 47 points 1 day ago

We are looking at a coup, they already have judicial power, order forces, and when they get most departments and branches, they will take the legislative power. I give it less than a month, they will start persecuting members of Congress that oppose the current regime.

[-] BradleyUffner@lemmy.world 14 points 21 hours ago

I give it less than a month, they will start persecuting members of Congress that oppose the current regime.

It's already happening at the state level. Tennessee is passing a law that would make it illegal for state legislature to vote against a bill that aligns with federal policy.

https://www.newsweek.com/tennessee-bill-would-prohibit-voting-against-trump-immigration-policies-2023749

[-] AngryRobot@lemmy.world 5 points 20 hours ago

I guess they've never heard of states' rights...

[-] SVcross@lemmy.world 1 points 20 hours ago

They thought of everything.

[-] Jhex@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

Americans voted for this (or didn't bother to vote to avoid it)

[-] Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

A government that was more intent on ruling than governing, has been doing all it can to muddy the waters on constitutional interpretation, finally hit a tipping point.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago

What is happening is that they don't care about the law.

Also what is happening is people still seem to be surprised by that.

[-] thefluffiest@feddit.nl 116 points 1 day ago

Attention all federal employees! Chances are you’re gonna get your ass fired anyway, so malicious compliance is the watchword from now on. Leak, document, obfuscate, lie, confuse, sidetrack and goosechase them every chance you get.

Remember Hannah Arendt: evil is when every bureaucrat ‘just does their job’ because a higher power gave the order.

You’re the frontline of this fight now. Even if you never signed up for this. Because none of you did.

[-] superkret@feddit.org 182 points 1 day ago

now leads the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), which has controversially seized control of federal payment and personnel systems.

Why the fuck do they still write like this? DOGE isn't a department of the government, it's just Elon with a Carte Blanche. And there's nothing controversial about this, it's a coup in plain sight.

[-] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 2 points 19 hours ago

And wasn't it originally going to have him and Ramaswamy or however the fuck you spell it as co-heads? Like, the top position was redundant out of the gate, and we're supposed to take its idea of "efficiency" seriously?

[-] superkret@feddit.org 1 points 16 hours ago

No, you're supposed to wonder what exactly its purpose is, who leads it, on what legal basis, and what the limits of its power are.
While 20-something year old unelected goons who won't say their names dismantle the government in a week.

[-] dhork@lemmy.world 62 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

It actually is. They took a Obama-era department and rebranded it

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_DOGE_Service

Which means it's full expanded name is "United States Department of Government Efficiency Service". Which is super efficient, isn't it?

[-] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 1 points 21 hours ago

And DOGE is pretty much the mirror of RAGE (Remove All Government Employees), which a pretty infamous techbro came up with.

[-] superkret@feddit.org 34 points 1 day ago

The name may have already existed. But what Elon is doing in its name isn't what a governmental department does.

[-] dhork@lemmy.world 27 points 1 day ago

It is now. Elon Musk says so, and he bought a President.

[-] cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca 19 points 1 day ago

It also bugs me how the O is stylized as a capital. In acronyms, isn't it proper to make it lowercase if it's a filler word like "of"?

And should he know this as an elite PoE (path of exile) player?

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago
[-] cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca 4 points 21 hours ago

Omg makes sense now. I never followed that blatant meme coin.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 4 points 21 hours ago

Everything he ever does is a grift. I can't even imagine a life like that.

load more comments (10 replies)
[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago

You cannot leak information! I'm the one who leaks information! -fElon

[-] deacon@lemmy.world 45 points 1 day ago

For any dedicated centrists, or even Trump Voters who are starting to feel this increasingly itchy feeling in the back of your mind, like there is a question you want to ask but your brain kind of shies away from putting it into words, let me help you out:

Yes, you are the baddies. Yes, it is only going to get more uncomfortable from here on out. If you haven't walked away after reading this comment, you are now choosing the side you know is wrong. On purpose. That is now your identity.

[-] HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com 73 points 1 day ago

How exactly is elon who has no position in teh government firing people?

[-] dohpaz42@lemmy.world 37 points 1 day ago

He has an entire department that was created specifically for him to do shit like this.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] peoplebeproblems@midwest.social 34 points 1 day ago

Whistleblower protections may challenge Musk's crackdown on leaks.

Lmfao. How, exactly, are whistleblower protections going to do shit ?

Know what Nazis and the USSR did to "whistleblowers"? They killed them. Just a matter of time before these people who are leaking the information and slowing things down get shot for "refusing to vacate the premise" after being fired.

[-] Bill@lemmy.ca 13 points 1 day ago

Like the Boeing whistle-blowers?

[-] ieatpwns@lemmy.world 43 points 1 day ago

So he wants them to quit but if they leak anything he’ll fire them? His mind is an enigma

[-] Banana@sh.itjust.works 33 points 1 day ago

I hope people just say fuck it and leak everything

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

A lot of that is happening. But you've still got to leak to a source. After the way Snowden and Assange were handled, and the degree to which the bigger journals and news channels have been compromised by conservative financial interests, there's a big open question of who you even tell this stuff to.

Going to another Glenn Greenwald or Matt Taibbi would be a huge mistake.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] MCasq_qsaCJ_234@lemmy.zip 27 points 1 day ago

What if the workers leak information that Elon is an agent of China?

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works 16 points 1 day ago

This man needs to be tried for treason, convicted, and hanged for his crimes against the republic.

[-] Sanctus@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago

We can't let them complete the Network State takeover. This is hostile to democracy. We will not survive this.

[-] forrgott@lemm.ee 15 points 1 day ago

Why are you using their made up name for it?

Network State = fascism

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Snowclone@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

If you tell on me I'LL FIRE YOU! also, here's your pink slip, we're going a different direction, goodbye.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 03 Feb 2025
535 points (100.0% liked)

politics

19694 readers
2453 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS