530

Summary

Thousands protested in downtown Los Angeles on Sunday against a surge in ICE raids under President Trump’s administration.

Demonstrators marched from Olvera Street to City Hall before blocking lanes on the 101 Freeway, leading to major traffic disruptions.

The California Department of Transportation confirmed freeway closures, while LAPD reported gridlock across key streets.

Trump has intensified deportations since taking office, prompting widespread demonstrations in major cities. Authorities have yet to confirm arrests or further enforcement actions.

top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Brkdncr@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago
[-] Drusas@fedia.io 15 points 1 day ago

FFS, don't Los Angelenos have enough going on right now?

[-] usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.ml 58 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Yeah - like everything ICE is doing on top of their recent fires

Glad to see people in solidarity here pushing back

[-] tiefling 33 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

You'd be complaining about Rosa Parks and the peaceful sit ins in the 1950s-60s, wouldn't you

[-] Drusas@fedia.io 30 points 1 day ago

What the fuck are you on about? My meaning was that ICE should leave these people alone because they have enough to deal with right now.

[-] Jericho_Kane@lemmy.org 4 points 20 hours ago

Idk, i thought it was really clear and i was confused by the downvotes.

[-] tiefling 33 points 1 day ago

Your comment does not make that obvious. Interpreted as is, it sounds like you're complaining about the protesters.

[-] Drusas@fedia.io 3 points 1 day ago

When somebody says that someone "has enough going on" that means that you should leave them be because they have enough going on, don't make it worse. It really should have been pretty clear. It's a common expression.

[-] Empricorn@feddit.nl 1 points 14 hours ago

This is an article about protests to ICE raids, not the raids themselves. Therefore your comment appears to be reacting to the protests unless you provide clarification.

[-] Cataphract@lemmy.ml 4 points 19 hours ago

I honestly read it both ways. I was confused and looked at your further comments for clarity but people before me didn't have that luxury. What is a Los Angelenos? To a progressive it means anyone residing in the city limits (or once did), to a right-wing definition it would be the registered approved-citizens (blah blah).

This article also centers around the premise of the protests, so by saying "they don't need this right now", it seems you're demeaning the protests and not the ICE actions which have been on-going. It's apparent after reading more, but your first comment wasn't a clear, concise, and easily communicated premise or else you wouldn't see all of the confusion obviously

[-] gladflag@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)
  • Title: Protest in LA
  • You: Don’t they have enough going on?

See how it looked? Maybe you should work on your communication.

[-] Drusas@fedia.io 3 points 1 day ago

You probably only think so because you already saw it downvoted and got on the downvote brigade.

Regardless, you misinterpreted.

[-] HappyTimeHarry@lemm.ee 5 points 1 day ago

Looks like a lot of people have difficulty figuring out that this comment is directed at ICE leaving citizens alone and think you meant the people doing the protesting.

Man leftists are so bad at infighting

[-] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

Will you say this when ICE starts deporting firefighters?

[-] Drusas@fedia.io 6 points 1 day ago

What? Yes. Stop deporting people and let them live their lives.

[-] Jericho_Kane@lemmy.org 4 points 20 hours ago

Everyone seems really confused here

[-] labbbb2@thelemmy.club 1 points 1 day ago

It's like in some authoritarian regimes, where there is a protest against some 'little' issue.

I mean, calls for Trump impeachment/decent rule of law and democracy seem more effective, isn't it?

this post was submitted on 02 Feb 2025
530 points (100.0% liked)

politics

19675 readers
2453 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS