234
fucking hate this guy rule (files.catbox.moe)
submitted 1 day ago by spujb@lemmy.cafe to c/onehundredninetysix
top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Enkers@sh.itjust.works 33 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

You take that back about broccoli.

Broccoli gets a bad rap from being steamed and served plain. If you grill it, or bake it, or pan fry it, or have it in Asian dishes with sauce, it's a god tier veggie, and should never be slandered.

Trump is too much of a moron to understand.

[-] Psionicsickness@reddthat.com 22 points 1 day ago

First of all, you’re right.

Second of all, steamed plain? I’m still eating the fuck outta that shit.

I really like broccoli.

[-] MutilationWave@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

No salt? I really love broccoli but the salt is necessary.

[-] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

And the olive oil.

[-] Ioughttamow@fedia.io 7 points 1 day ago

Roast it and salt it

not really how this guy works. if there isnt a grift that will benefit him personally.. .like cornering the broccoli market... it wouldnt happen.

its not about right or wrong or anything other than 'how do i benefit personally'

[-] spujb@lemmy.cafe 23 points 1 day ago

oh but didn’t you hear? he’s buddies with Melon Husk (owner of big veggie table) these days. my guy is absolutely benefiting (and probably keeping all the sweets to himself too)

[-] MrJameGumb@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago

Donald Trump has never eaten broccoli in his life, more likely he would make McDonald's and KFC mandatory at all meals and declare that ketchup is the same as a whole days serving of fruits and vegetables

[-] ragebutt@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

This is true but he would do something like this, force everyone to be unhappy, and just eat the now illegal food. He would do it blatantly. He would take photo ops signing executive orders with matchbox cars and McDonald’s cups on his desk and then blame a staffer for leaving them there when everyone, including his die hards, would 100% know that moments before they shoved that placard into his hand he was chugging Diet Coke and making that car do sweet jumps. But then the die hards, knowing he was full of shit, would push the narrative that someone else did it, and twist it (deepfakes, never happened, etc) until they started to believe it themselves.

Then the media would call it some stupid shit like sodagate and snopes would have an article like did Donald trump actually drink soda and play with toys? They’d post the picture the body would be like “while many believe trump did drink the soda based on his historical love of the drink, the official narrative is that it belonged to a member of staff who has not been named. Additionally there have been several debunked theories about the photo being doctored or the situation being a fabriction.” With no definitive ruling on whether he did or not because they often don’t seem to do that anymore to seem “impartial”

At this point though he would have already done something else ridiculous and horrible so everyone would’ve moved on. “Who cares about mcdonalds and toys?” you say. “Did you not just hear he literally banned people from thinking about the concept of trans people and imposed a 40% tariff on anything blue?”

[-] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

Not bad, but instead of stuff like this, I have the idea for "President Psycho", an over-the-top action thriller set in the US, where a then unknown serial killer wins the presidential election, pardons other serial killers, and then starts the biggest killing spree in human history even as his loyalists are leaving him for stuff like legalizing animal cruelty, legalizing torturing people to death if said people are part of the out-group, and practicing cannibalism on live television.

[-] beliquititious 6 points 1 day ago

No, that's too real. 90% of that is true about him. I want to see more executive orders where he bans light beer because bud lite used dei to make an ad two years ago. Or an executive order renaming mount rushmoore to mount trump and charging the families of the presidents carved in it advertising rights.

[-] Fleur_@lemm.ee 2 points 1 day ago

Unironically like this idea

[-] Turret3857@infosec.pub 1 points 1 day ago

parappa mentioned

this post was submitted on 31 Jan 2025
234 points (100.0% liked)

196

1841 readers
2638 users here now

Community Rules

You must post before you leave

Be nice. Assume others have good intent (within reason).

Block or ignore posts, comments, and users that irritate you in some way rather than engaging. Report if they are actually breaking community rules.

Use content warnings and/or mark as NSFW when appropriate. Most posts with content warnings likely need to be marked NSFW.

Most 196 posts are memes, shitposts, cute images, or even just recent things that happened, etc. There is no real theme, but try to avoid posts that are very inflammatory, offensive, very low quality, or very "off topic".

Bigotry is not allowed, this includes (but is not limited to): Homophobia, Transphobia, Racism, Sexism, Abelism, Classism, or discrimination based on things like Ethnicity, Nationality, Language, or Religion.

Avoid shilling for corporations, posting advertisements, or promoting exploitation of workers.

Proselytization, support, or defense of authoritarianism is not welcome. This includes but is not limited to: imperialism, nationalism, genocide denial, ethnic or racial supremacy, fascism, Nazism, Marxism-Leninism, Maoism, etc.

Avoid AI generated content.

Avoid misinformation.

Avoid incomprehensible posts.

No threats or personal attacks.

No spam.

Moderator Guidelines

Moderator Guidelines

  • Don’t be mean to users. Be gentle or neutral.
  • Most moderator actions which have a modlog message should include your username.
  • When in doubt about whether or not a user is problematic, send them a DM.
  • Don’t waste time debating/arguing with problematic users.
  • Assume the best, but don’t tolerate sealioning/just asking questions/concern trolling.
  • Ask another mod to take over cases you struggle with, if you get tired, or when things get personal.
  • Ask the other mods for advice when things get complicated.
  • Share everything you do in the mod matrix, both so several mods aren't unknowingly handling the same issues, but also so you can receive feedback on what you intend to do.
  • Don't rush mod actions. If a case doesn't need to be handled right away, consider taking a short break before getting to it. This is to say, cool down and make room for feedback.
  • Don’t perform too much moderation in the comments, except if you want a verdict to be public or to ask people to dial a convo down/stop. Single comment warnings are okay.
  • Send users concise DMs about verdicts about them, such as bans etc, except in cases where it is clear we don’t want them at all, such as obvious transphobes. No need to notify someone they haven’t been banned of course.
  • Explain to a user why their behavior is problematic and how it is distressing others rather than engage with whatever they are saying. Ask them to avoid this in the future and send them packing if they do not comply.
  • First warn users, then temp ban them, then finally perma ban them when they break the rules or act inappropriately. Skip steps if necessary.
  • Use neutral statements like “this statement can be considered transphobic” rather than “you are being transphobic”.
  • No large decisions or actions without community input (polls or meta posts f.ex.).
  • Large internal decisions (such as ousting a mod) might require a vote, needing more than 50% of the votes to pass. Also consider asking the community for feedback.
  • Remember you are a voluntary moderator. You don’t get paid. Take a break when you need one. Perhaps ask another moderator to step in if necessary.

founded 1 week ago
MODERATORS