448
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] RangerJosey@lemmy.ml 10 points 6 days ago

That's an optimistic timeline.

At the current pace I'll give it till June.

[-] thatradomguy@lemmy.world 5 points 6 days ago

So why don't we just eat the rich? Why can't we do the gamestop stock thing again at a bigger scale?

[-] sith@lemmy.zip 3 points 6 days ago

For the US, my guess is: within the next 4 years. Inflation will be insane. Lets hope blue collar can organize and leverage the situation.

[-] return2ozma@lemmy.world 121 points 1 week ago
[-] Kyrgizion@lemmy.world 83 points 1 week ago

This is why the fascist billionaires are carrying out their great takeover. They know the jig is up and everything's going to crumble down and no one will escape it.

They just want to rob whatever they still can before they too croak. Thre is no great plan for their survival beyond a few years in an underground bunker, either...

[-] CosmoNova@lemmy.world 78 points 1 week ago

It’s a hilariously incompetent strategy by the rich because they’re more dependent on a functioning society than any other group. You can tell they’re not smart nor good leaders when they build luxury bunkers in New Zealand because those won’t save them from losing virtually (and possibly literally) everything they have. They have everything to lose and the only thing they need to do to keep their wealth and power is to contribute to the society they’re living off of. They’re failing miserably because they lack compassion. It will be their downfall.

[-] sith@lemmy.zip 1 points 6 days ago

Unregulated capitalism in a nutshell.

[-] seven_phone@lemmy.world 31 points 1 week ago

It is why they are hastily trying to turn the calendar back to 1933 but they might overshoot and get 1789.

[-] hungryphrog 10 points 1 week ago

Just hope nobody does a Napoleon...

[-] seven_phone@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago
[-] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 1 week ago

Napoleon was actually about average height for the time. The shortness thing was just British (?) war propaganda to, for lack of a less on the nose term, belittle him in the public consciousness.

Barron IS still freakishly tall, though. He should either stop doing that or become really good at basketball or volleyball.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] DicJacobus@lemmy.world 20 points 1 week ago

Elon literally built a doomsday retreat in Texas, where most of the women he's fathered children live. as well as most of his children.
some notable exceptions, Grimes isnt there, nor the child who became Trans. for obvious reasons

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] SpaghettiYeti@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

I got news for you. We can already store food for dozens of years, if not a hundred in mylar bags with O2 absorbers. With enough money you could store enough food for you, security, families, and all supplies to repair and maintain an underground bunker for a lifetime, easily.

[-] DicJacobus@lemmy.world 49 points 1 week ago

within the next decade?

We're already most of the way there. Inept, Incompetent, and overtly corrupt governments engraging the population homelessness, unemployment, unpopular immigration and costs of necessities going haywire trade wars brewing, Oh, and World War III is basically already in it's pre-game show stage with the fighting in Europe.

I'm at the point where Im expecting it any day. the US is just one bad move away from causing an all out revolt, because part of its population rightly thinks that the new admnistration is full of mobsters, tyrants, and fascists.

[-] AfricanGrey@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 week ago

Knock knock open up the door it's real!

[-] labbbb2@thelemmy.club 6 points 1 week ago

By the way, Trump wonders if Americans will let him treat them like this and continues to do "his business"

[-] gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de 41 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Well, this has been known for decades, the Club or Rome's report (Limits of Growth) predicted this in the 1970s. Here's a graphic from 2004:


We need UBI (Universal Basic Income) or people are going to not be able to afford basic commodities any more. We already see working poor, it's gonna get worse. Demand UBI.

[-] sp3tr4l@lemmy.zip 6 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

And here's the latest recalibration, done in 2023, main difference is that pollution just uses co2 level instead of a complex aggregate of pollution metrics.

Your pictured 2004 model may be the BAU model in these charts, not 100% sure, but Recalibration23 is the latest one.

EDIT: Looks like BAU2.

EDIT 2: Ah, didn't realize who I was replying to, haha. I have apparently successfully evangelized this model to you from that other thread a few days ago.

Still useful for any other readers to see.

...

Socialism or barbarism wasn't just a catchphrase.

Unfortinately, we chose barbarism... even if a miraculous overthrow of capitalism happened right now... I think it is about two decades to late to avoid a catastrophic collapse in standard of living and loss of life.

[-] sith@lemmy.zip 1 points 6 days ago

I used to be pro UBI. Now I'm not so sure. The only resilient tool for increased equality is an organized work force that has real economic power. Workers on UBI has no real power and the UBI can be taken away anytime by those in power.

And if AI takes all jobs.. Well, lets cross that bridge when we get there. Maybe we simply have to hope for that crypto bro UBI solution. Qualia will be our last currency.

An organized work force in the USA is wishful thinking. It could have happened any time in the last 150 years, it didn't. I don't see it happening now.

UBI is a temporary measure. While i agree with you, that it weakens the stance of the population, because they are dependent on welfare money, i'm still reasonably sure it's way better than literally dying by starving to death. Because that's what's otherwise gonna happen.

The only true solution i see is reducing the population size. Supply and demand. If the workforce is smaller, wages are going to go up. The ethical options to do this is by being against migration, and giving women the option to have fewer children. But yeah, you can't say that, or "leftists" will call you a racist, while Trumpeteers will call you a "baby-murderer". So, i guess the USA is stuck.

[-] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 16 points 1 week ago

Few people are just going to sit and starve. They will steal food directly or turn to other crimes to get money to buy food.

[-] mke_geek@lemm.ee 6 points 1 week ago

UBW -- universal basic work. Jobs for everyone who wants them.

[-] flicker@lemmy.dbzer0.com 20 points 1 week ago

I can think of so many jobs that we don't have because they make no money, but that would better society as a whole. There should be no reason we can't... do that.

i guess this depends on whether you see yourself as a person who deserves basic goods, or if you see yourself as a workforce who needs to be told what to do to be happy.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] jonne@infosec.pub 32 points 1 week ago

I can think of a couple of ways to fix that.

[-] Chainweasel@lemmy.world 24 points 1 week ago

"within the next decade" sounds like an unnecessarily long view on it. Next Christmas will come within the next decade too but it doesn't mean it'll be 10 years from now.

[-] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 20 points 1 week ago

You know, revolution is not the same as collapse.

[-] sith@lemmy.zip 1 points 6 days ago

It usually is. Its a high risk gamble that can lead to basically anyghing. And probably that anything will be bad for the poor. Reformism and organized labor is a safer path towards increased equality. But maybe that ship has sailed for the US...

[-] OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca 16 points 1 week ago
[-] Agent641@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

For them it is catastrophic collapse of the stonk market and economy with trillions of wealth evaporating overnight.

For us, it is Tuesday.

[-] harmsy@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago

┏━┓┏━╸ ┏━┓┏━┓╻╶╻┏━┓┏━┓┏━╸ ▋
┃╶┃┣━╶ ┃╶╶┃╶┃┃╶┃┣┳┛┗━┓┣━╶ ▋
┗━┛╹╶╶ ┗━┛┗━┛┗━┛╹╹╶┗━┛┗━╸ ▖

[-] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 17 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

The participants identified a negative feedback loop, whereby the government’s failure to tax wealth effectively means it lacks sufficient revenue to uphold the social contract by which strong public services, an effective social safety net and a healthy economy provide people with decent living standards.

Trust in politics then declines further, politicians avoid honest discussions of the underlying problems and what to do about them, and the system’s legitimacy is increasingly questioned as the social contract collapses.

That's a nice story, but there's been plenty of even less egalitarian societies. Pretty much all of the ones in written history, actually.

More likely, in the short term a new, more coercive "social contract" will be rotated in (if the trend continues). Heck, we're already seeing it a bit in the US. Now showing fealty to the president is more important than public relations for a lot of companies and billionaires.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] wabafee@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago
[-] BestBouclettes@jlai.lu 21 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Not really, given the current state of the world, it would most likely accelerate the rise of fascism, war and the further environmental destruction of the planet.

[-] SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago

Yeah you only need to look at post world war 1 Germany to see how that works out. Or post USSR Russia. It’s fascism that rises to the top.

[-] spooky2092 9 points 1 week ago

I'm pretty sure that's the aim of most accelerationists

[-] BestBouclettes@jlai.lu 6 points 1 week ago

Pretty much, you know what you'll lose but not what you'll get. A societal collapse would lead to a massive power vacuum that could lead both ways, but I'm not optimistic for a good outcome...

[-] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 1 week ago

I'd agree if it was just the oppressive system and the power and wealth of those benefitting the most from it collapsing with no ripple effects, but the most vulnerable groups of people will take the brunt of the initial damage long before the billionaires feel it.

A shitload of innocent people are going to die from the devastation wrought by a few billionaires and the politicians they own. Even more so than today.

[-] Malek061@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago

Already there.

[-] griD@feddit.org 9 points 1 week ago

$1Trillion dollars wiped off the stock market? NBD, just push the AI more, so we can be free from the labour(ers). So cooked.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] TheFriar@lemm.ee 9 points 1 week ago

The ownership class reading this: “…the training wheels are coming off, boys. It’s time we really kick this thing into high gear. We’re running out of time. Get your affairs in order—and by that I mean pick which if your mistresses will be your concubines on your floating golden fortress.”

“Understood.”

The group: “‘we’re the fuckin worst’ on three—one, two, three!

All:

“WE’RE THE FUCKING WORST!”

Generic white guy #1: “Alright, good hustle. Now go out there and fuckin murder some lower class people! This death machine ain’t gonna run itself! lol obviously im kidding, we were born into a machine that already runs itself and we were just the dumb lucky bastards born into the positions we’re in. But we deserve it!

Generic white guy #12: woah, Tom, you thought a little too much there. I’m afraid…we’re gonna have to take away the “#1” from your position. We worked hard to get where we are today! Don’t you EVER suggest there is an inherent flaw in a hierarchical system! You will be punished severely for even MAKING a reference to some FAKE injustice in our system! You are now #4. Other Tom, congratulations, now you’re #1. You must be very proud to hold this position.

Previously Generic white guy #4: this is an honor. I deserve this.

[-] labbbb2@thelemmy.club 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

"Boris Johnson with his Russian connections and Brexit is innocent, if you think he is..."

[-] jimmy90@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

pretty sure they said the same ting 10 years ago

[-] DicJacobus@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago

10 years ago, it was a night and day better world state.

Even Trump 1.0, the worst thing in the world at the time was the ISIS threat. In Trump 2.0, We live in a world with

  • WW3 Basically in its opening stage in Ukraine, Russia is pretty much fucked, but NATO is fucked too now that the US is run by someone who hates it
  • Post Covid destruction of the economy
  • The billionares have turned megalomaniac and wormed their way into government ears
  • The US had an attempted Coup, the person who organized it is now the POTUS. and the people who participated in it are on the streets
  • the gradual increase of uneducated stupidity through social media and MSM TV Brainrot.

We've basically been in a spiral towards armageddon this decade, the 2020s are BRUTAL compared to the mid 2010s.

[-] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

And the trend has only accelerated since. Especially now that the fascists are implementing Project 2025 with frantic haste.

Just like with climate change, the fact that they hardly ever get the timeframe stated in the headlines right doesn't mean that the emergency isn't real.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 30 Jan 2025
448 points (100.0% liked)

World News

40340 readers
3047 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS