326
submitted 2 days ago by Cat@ponder.cat to c/politics@lemmy.world
top 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] aaron@lemm.ee 79 points 2 days ago

Seriously? Who knew Project 2025 was being implemented?

[-] boredtortoise@lemm.ee 30 points 2 days ago
[-] aaron@lemm.ee 41 points 2 days ago

Well I certainly didn't. Trump clearly said Project 2025 would NOT be implemented. Does he think I'm some kind of fool?

[-] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 20 points 1 day ago

He also said he loved the plan and would implement it

Then said he might not implement all of it

Before saying he never heard of it

No idea why the media ran with the last one, it’s almost like they wanted him to win

[-] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 11 points 1 day ago

Yes. Yes he does.

The answer to this question is always yes in every context.

[-] prole 7 points 1 day ago

This has to be a joke right?

[-] anomnom@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago

I believe they are being facetious, but there is a chance they are actually fascist. Maybe take a look at their other posts to try and figure it out?

[-] prole 1 points 20 hours ago

Maybe take a look at their other posts to try and figure it out?

Nah I'm good.

[-] jballs@sh.itjust.works 18 points 1 day ago

Just goes to show that while Trump is the face of the problem, he's more of a symptom than the cause. The Republican party is rotten to the core and even if Trump chokes on a Big Mac tomorrow, the problem is not going away.

[-] itsonlygeorge@reddthat.com 9 points 1 day ago
[-] rickdg@lemmy.world 40 points 2 days ago

People still voted for it expecting magic to keep away the bad stuff.

[-] Ghyste@sh.itjust.works 38 points 2 days ago

No one could possibly have expected this.

[-] CitizenKong@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago

I was recently invited to a face-eating party by a bunch of face-eating leopards that I know. Imagine my surprise as they ate my face!

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 29 points 1 day ago

{{SHOCK!!}}

[-] Dragomus@lemmy.world 32 points 1 day ago

"Dictator, but only on day 1"

Any other ...untruths... no one expected? /s

[-] Crazyslinkz@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Make America Grovel Again

[-] werefreeatlast@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

So he is letting others play president? Did they pay him for that service?

[-] Bonesince1997@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

"...well underway."

this post was submitted on 29 Jan 2025
326 points (100.0% liked)

politics

19607 readers
2453 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS