539
submitted 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) by hsr@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/nottheonion@lemmy.world

Vice President JD Vance said Saturday that "we believe fundamentally that big tech does have too much power," despite the prominent positioning of tech CEOs at President Trump's inauguration last week.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] futatorius@lemm.ee 26 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Translation: he thinks they're not fascist enough.

[-] vonbaronhans@midwest.social 5 points 1 day ago

That is, unfortunately, what I think this means, too.

[-] yildolw@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago

Peter Thiel's mole says that? Maybe Peter Thiel is hoping to take over Google for cheap or something

[-] VindictiveJudge@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Probably. If I were Vance, whether the Never Trump thing was genuine or I was just a power hungry asshole, I'd be positioning myself to look like the sane one in the administration so that I could remove Trump via the 25th in 2027 and be hailed as the guy who saved America from him. I'd also be egging Trump and Musk on to be as terrible as possible as publicly as possible.

[-] fne8w2ah@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago

They sure don't understand irony, do they?

[-] lightsblinken@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

"... too much more power than me"

[-] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 day ago

Oh hey, he's saying the thing the Democrats should have campaigned on.

[-] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 33 points 2 days ago

Funny thing for a guy who just got bankrolled into the vice presidency by big tech to say.

Also, shut the fuck up, no one cares what a vice president thinks.

[-] alvvayson@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 1 day ago

You don't understand. This is tech tribal war.

"Big Tech" is Apple, Google, Microsoft, OpenAI and Meta. Companies which were fully allied with the Democrats, and which were king of the tech hill until now.

Musk, Thiel and Ellison (Tesla, Palantir and Oracle) are allied with Trump. Lets call them "Tech B".

Vance is doing code speak for: Tech B is gonna break Big Tech up and take top spot.

And Big Tech knows this, which is why they are scrambling to get into Trumps good graces and trying to get Trump on their side.

They have more money and influence right now and they are trying to leverage that to keep top spot.

And Trump is just letting the two teams bid up each other for his favour.

[-] futatorius@lemm.ee 4 points 1 day ago

Yeah, except there have been defections from Big Tech to Tech B, the prime example being Meta. Zuckerbot has gone and kissed the ring, and has shifted Meta to push more rightwing lies. And OpenAI has been Musk-adjacent from its start, so I'm not sure where it should go. And I'd use Xitter as the Musk example rather than Tesla, since Tesla's primarily a carmaker, not a tech company, despite its doing clever things with batteries now and then.

[-] Notyou@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 day ago

Can I subscribe to more newsletter, please?

[-] vonbaronhans@midwest.social 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

If Harris had won, I think I'd want to hear Tim Walz' opinion on everything. In his own words, live on a stream or something like that. I bet it would've been absolutely wild to hear this Midwestern dad give his takes on AI.

Edit: grammar mistakes

[-] pressanykeynow@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Didn't Apple, Google, Microsoft, Amazon, Meta all donated much more to Harris than to Trump? It's more like he got elected despite the big tech influence. Which explains why he's saying against them.

[-] octopus_ink@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 day ago

I don't know how to link comments across instances correctly, but you should see the other comment in reply to the same person you replied to, posted 4 hours before yours. It answers the very question you are asking. From @alvvayson@lemmy.dbzer0.com

[-] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 61 points 2 days ago

HOW THE FUCK DOES HE THINK HE GOT ELECTED

[-] __nobodynowhere@lemm.ee 16 points 2 days ago

He's playing a part.

[-] XTornado@lemmy.ml 8 points 2 days ago

Yeah that is why he wants to stop it, so others can't use it to get elected. 😜

[-] 2ugly2live@lemmy.world 26 points 2 days ago

Did he ask step-daddy Musk before making that statement?

[-] Geobloke@lemm.ee 3 points 1 day ago

Nah, he's under Thiel

[-] Fedizen@lemmy.world 20 points 2 days ago
[-] pjwestin@lemmy.world 25 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I read this as him attempting to stand up to Elon and regain some of the political relevance he had before he joined the Trump ticket. Of course, it's not gonna work. He's gonna get curb-stomped (potentially literally, at this point), and by 2028, the Democrats will be campaigning with him.

[-] futatorius@lemm.ee 2 points 1 day ago

And what political relevancy was that, exactly? That hectoring poverty-porn book he wrote, that was like Horatio Alger sucking off Peter Thiel?

[-] pjwestin@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Yes, that's what I'm referring to. Remember how many moderate Democrats ate that shit up and anointed him the working-class whisperer? He wants that back.

[-] Wogi@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago

Shame it's too late for the Democrats to wheel out Henry Kissinger and Robert E Lee to campaign with.

[-] pjwestin@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago

It's 2032. The Democratic ticket is Mike Pence and J.D. Vance. Their key issue is immigration, where they argue that immigrants should be sent to labor camps instead of exterminated. They are easily defeated by Trump, who's entire campaign consists of telling incoherent stories about celebrities until he trails off into a series of racial slurs. The Democrats believe they lost by being too soft on immigration, but they're optimistic that they can have a productive relationship with Vice President Benjamin Netanyahu.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] 100_kg_90_de_belin@feddit.it 56 points 2 days ago

JD is starting to realize that there is a second group chat

[-] Guntrigger@sopuli.xyz 149 points 3 days ago

Blink twice if you're locked in a tech billionaire's basement right now

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 29 points 2 days ago

Don't let President Musk hear you say that.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] kbal@fedia.io 111 points 3 days ago

Help the poor! (by cutting taxes for the rich)

Fix social media! (by forcing them to allow hate speech)

Stop the war! (by forcing Ukraine to surrender)

Fight inflation! (by imposing tariffs on everything)

[-] futatorius@lemm.ee 66 points 3 days ago

End genocide! (by encouraging them to finish the genocide already so we can build some hotels over the charred corpses)

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] inv3r5ion@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 2 days ago

Except he’s Peter thiels human toy?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] cupcakezealot 20 points 2 days ago

First true thing couch fucker has said considering Big Tech basically owns the Trump admin.

[-] futatorius@lemm.ee 2 points 1 day ago

I'd say it's more a volatile coalition between Broligarch MAGA and LumpenMAGA.

[-] squid_slime@lemm.ee 18 points 2 days ago
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] rustydrd@sh.itjust.works 49 points 3 days ago

Vance: But Peter, won't everyone realize that you just bought the vice presidency by supporting me?

Thiel: Just tell them "tech people bad" or some shit, they'll be none the wiser.

[-] Rinox@feddit.it 21 points 2 days ago

The US night of the long knives has come

[-] futatorius@lemm.ee 2 points 1 day ago

Or will it be more a defenestration-fest? Or maybe it'll alternate as Trump plays them off against each other.

[-] octopus_ink@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 day ago

Anti-trump tech bros start going out windows, I can already predict all the ways maga will dismiss the similarities to every person who disagrees with putin doing the same.

Well it's only been three people so far. That's not much of a pattern...

And on and on from there.

[-] PanArab@lemm.ee 30 points 2 days ago

Something we actually agree on.

[-] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 30 points 2 days ago

100% guarantee this pissfit about big tech is just because Musk is sitting where he thought he'd be.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] aesthelete@lemmy.world 18 points 2 days ago

I agree, but I also think the same about him (and he basically has no power until Trump chokes on a filet-o-fish).

[-] the_crotch@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago

Yeah, tiebreaking vote in the Senate doesn't mean.much when it's so heavily weighted on one side that a tie is impossible

[-] futatorius@lemm.ee 3 points 1 day ago

Three senators need to defect from the R's for it to be a tie. It's not insanely one-sided. It's just that they're well-trained to goose-step in sync.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 27 Jan 2025
539 points (100.0% liked)

Not The Onion

12980 readers
1262 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Comments must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS