294
top 37 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] FundMECFSResearch 7 points 6 days ago

I mean, fuck cars, but I always appreciate creative and funky design. Can’t have everything look the same cough american suburbia cough

[-] sga@lemmings.world 5 points 6 days ago

I can't think of any downsides, besides the increased construction cost (not really sure how much increase, considering the ground space required is less, and no digging, but designing hanging fuel tanks, maybe about 1-2 tons of fuel would be hard) and limit on the capacity stored. Why were they discontinued? Was the disaster risk any higher. My initial guess it that any body driving and smashing the pumps is not present anymore, they are built high enough to not be hit by trucks.

[-] _cryptagion@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 6 days ago

If one of those catches fire, say from a spark, it's going to be dumping burning gas all over everyone nearby. They obviously retract out of the way when not in use, and if the hose you're holding suddenly turns into a flamethrower, your first instinct is going to be to let go of it.

[-] sga@lemmings.world 4 points 6 days ago

that seems to be a solvable problem, you can add pretty good fail proof (read resistant) valves. And the retraction can be controlled to never let any fuel come back, so even if the hoses catch fire, they would pretty quickly dry out. Combined with good sensors, these could outperform modern stuff in theory. (or atleast I believe so)

[-] vonxylofon@lemmy.world 63 points 1 week ago
[-] TargaryenTKE@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago

That was my first and only question, thanks!

[-] protist@mander.xyz 55 points 1 week ago

Little drops of gasoline raining down on your head

[-] ChicoSuave@lemmy.world 21 points 1 week ago

This is also in 1970s USSR, so there is a non-zero chance someone pulled up while smoking. Embers and ambient gas fumes are probably why this gas station is no longer around.

[-] LogicalDrivel@sopuli.xyz 16 points 1 week ago

I guess short people were just screwed? I guess it was probably full service.

[-] GTG3000@programming.dev 19 points 1 week ago

I remember seeing one or two stations like this when I was a kid. The hoses lowered down after you paid, so you don't need to be tall to use it.

[-] limer@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 1 week ago

Self service started in the USA about a decade earlier due to minimum wage hikes: entrepreneurial attempts to cut off until then required pumping jobs succeeded, much to everyone’s surprise.

Then devious concept followed in Europe about a decade later, about the time the time this picture was taken. Still most were full service there

[-] pennomi@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago

I mean I’m personally happy I don’t need to have someone help me fill a fuel tank. I’m happy to do self checkout. Hell, I’d be happy to make my own sandwich at a restaurant if they’d let me.

[-] wildncrazyguy138@fedia.io 11 points 1 week ago

In theory, I would like full service if it was just like 10-20¢ more and the person performing the work truly cared about the job they were doing.

Imagine someone topping off your wiper fluid, washing your windows and doing a high level walk-around your car to ensure nothing looks out of place. Perhaps even some small talk about a good route for a Sunday drive or interesting events in the area, like a parade or public concert downtown next week.

But the reality is, like the beautiful sink your teeth into burger on the commercial versus the squished train wreck I actually get, those kinds of service people would be few and far in between. And, while I don’t necessarily blame folks for going all minimum viable product, I still think it sucks that we do. So self service it is.

[-] somewhiteguy@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

You would imagine that someone would have already re-tried this idea and called it "bespoke gas service" or some nonsense. Put it as a subscription service and prolific nature of Love's or Buc-ee's and you would get people signing up like crazy.

[-] wise_pancake@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 week ago

I don’t mind filling the tank but I hate self checkout.

I make good sandwiches though.

[-] pennomi@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

Out of curiosity, what’s to hate about self checkout? It’s faster and you don’t have to talk to anybody.

Obviously preference matters so I’m not going to judge you for it!

[-] wise_pancake@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 week ago

I’m slow at it and I find just loading groceries onto a belt a more efficient process. Plus when the machines mess up or I bag an item too quickly I get held up.

I just don’t enjoy it.

[-] limer@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 week ago

For me it is entering correct vegetable and fruit codes. I found it fun and a novelty when self checkout was first introduced, now I will go out of my way, slightly, to not enter or scan

[-] dunz@feddit.nu 6 points 1 week ago

You have to remember the codes?! I can either, depending on the type of selfcheckout, weigh at a weighing station and pick from images with text and get a sticker barcode printed to put on it, or select from images with text at the bagging station.

[-] limer@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 week ago

Where I am at, it’s much easier to just stuff things into bags without a care, and have God figure it out at the checkout

[-] smeg@feddit.uk 5 points 1 week ago

They have to approve my bloody bag every single time!

[-] f4f4f4f4f4f4f4f4@sopuli.xyz 3 points 6 days ago

"Unexpected item in bagging area." No, that's the shit I just scanned...

It's not self-service if you have to wait for a manager's approval every time!

[-] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 week ago

For some reason, Greece remains primarily without self-service. I wonder why it never caught on.

[-] jqubed@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

Just start dumping gas all over everything below when it starts leaking I guess

[-] Maeve@kbin.earth 4 points 1 week ago

I was watching a YouTube video about Victorian clothing (idk sometimes the suggestion algo actually pops up things that are interesting), where I learned about UFO (phantom airship) reports in the USA from 1896-1897. The illustrations I saw when I searched online resembled lighted zeppelins.

[-] superkret@feddit.org 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Fuck short people, I guess.
I'm betting the idea was that it works without electricity.

[-] HikingVet@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 week ago

Unless the fuel storage tanks are up that high, nope. You gotta pump it up there.

[-] superkret@feddit.org 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Yes, the tanks would be up there (why else build those huge saucers?)
The fuel truck can pump it up into those tanks using its engine.

[-] HikingVet@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 week ago

Those aren't big enough to hold any significant amount of fuel.

[-] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

Looking like UFOs

[-] bisby@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Based on the weird license plate, this is just a made up AI photo right?

[-] _cryptagion@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 6 days ago

Russians do not use the English alphabet, on account of not speaking English.

[-] bisby@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago

That wasn't the only part I was referring to. The edges around the letters on the license plates are weirdly lumpy. Every license plate Ive seen in Europe and the US are generally cleanly printed/stamped. These look hand painted. But I was never behind the Iron Curtain. It just looks very "AI smoothed" to me.

But everything about this picture feels weirdly AI. The logo on all of the pumps is just slightly different in each iteration. The guy's face. The texture on the wall down the entire left side, which somehow bleeds over the front of the car. The license plate on the left car has some numbers but the letters don't even look Cyrillic, they're just kinda mush.

So "Cyrillic letters on the license plate" aside, this photo is just FULL of weird AI anomalies.

[-] m0stlyharmless@lemm.ee 1 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

In the article that someone else linked in this thread, there are JPEG artifacts around the face of the man standing to the left of the car while the one in the post doesn’t have those features. It’s possible that it was run through some sort of upscaling tool and that’s what you’re picking up on.

Edit: After comparing the two photos in more detail, though the compression artifacts differ between the two images somewhat, they are present in both.

Nonetheless, there are numerous fine details in both versions that both seem a bit off from what I would expect.

If anything, this may be the result of this photo being taken in black and white and retroactively colorized. This possibility is ultimately contingent on whether it would be likely for the sort of person who took this photo to have access to color cameras.

Edit 2: The cropped sections of the photo you shared look like brushstrokes to me.

[-] alleycat@lemmy.world 24 points 1 week ago

Nope. The letters are just Cyrillic.

[-] Nougat@fedia.io 12 points 1 week ago

Or the Russians had AI building their cars in the 80s.

[-] FlihpFlorp@lemm.ee 4 points 1 week ago

You know too much

this post was submitted on 23 Jan 2025
294 points (100.0% liked)

HistoryPorn

5133 readers
77 users here now

If you would like to become a mod in this community, kindly PM the mod.

Relive the Past in Jaw-Dropping Detail!

HistoryPorn is for photographs (or, if it can be found, film) of the past, recent or distant! Give us a little snapshot of history!

Rules

  1. Be respectful and inclusive.
  2. No harassment, hate speech, or trolling.
  3. Engage in constructive discussions.
  4. Share relevant content.
  5. Follow guidelines and moderators' instructions.
  6. Use appropriate language and tone.
  7. Report violations.
  8. Foster a continuous learning environment.
  9. No genocide or atrocity denialism.

Pictures of old artifacts and museum pieces should go to History Artifacts

Illustrations and paintings should go to History Drawings

Related Communities:

Military Porn

Forgotten Weapons

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS