It's a free wifi service provided by the airline while on the flight. One ad, when most other places are charging $10-20 per flight? I'll watch the single ad. I'd rather that then someone, say, injecting adverts into sites and services. which is very possible.
I did until mobile phones became the norm, now I ask if they need her number to call. It made sense before phones were everywhere and you didn't make it to see everyone, but send a text yourself. My name isn't SMS.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/ucc/1/1-103 So, they're claiming commercial rights as an individual. I'm not sure any judge would want to deal with someone who doesn't understand the difference between individual and commercial. All of these I've seen deal with fighting their ability to drive a vehicle or child-support, so if it's related to that the judge wasn't getting puckered. He was getting ready to beat you with a mallet.
Is it still a thing? The website doesn't go anywhere and I can't find the app. All I can actually find are a few articles talking about how ridiculous it is to have a $2 subscription service on water fountains.
"Finance company owner purchases second home to get away from family"
There is the updated title. Not just a mother, a mother that owns their own company and wants to get away from family obligations. Do what you have to do to find peace, but this title does not express what is actually happening.
Confidence: having faith or belief in oneself and/or abilities
So, being confident during dating is just knowing you have what it takes to make it. Nothing about that is "bothering people", at least it shouldn't. Know what your character and abilities are and do your best with the rest. Dating is about learning what you're into and what they are into as well. Ask them questions that you'd like them to know about you as well, so you both learn. Date at places that are neutral and there isn't a ton of pressure. You don't have to be arrogant or loud, just know your worth and what you're good at.
You can do it. It sometimes feels like a lot, but you got this.
So, are we hoping this gets deleted as well to keep the tradition alive, or is this hopefully going to change moderation? I'm confused on how to feel about this.
Imagine the Super-Bug that would be created from this kind of thing.
Either it would destroy the world, or New York would become a complete haven of people totally immune to nearly all diseases.
It is definitely this. "You're not profilable, how do you expect us to sell you to advertisers?"
Reading the whole Section, it seems they are leaning on this one phrase:
"SEC. 505. (a) Except as provided in subsection (b) of this section, any citizen may commence a civil action on his own behalf "(1) against any person (including (i) the United States, and (ii) any other governmental instrumentality or agency to the extent permitted by the eleventh amendment to the Constitution) who is alleged to be in violation of (A) an effluent standard or limitation under this Act or (B) an order issued by the Administrator or a State with respect to such a standard or limitation,
Which is duplicated here in some part here: https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/33/1365
They're very good at looking at the letter of the law without considering the context or purpose of why it was written. Any number of logical fallacies are used to jump every shark possible.
I'm sure the stockholders he's been pandering to will love investing in a company that has a user base that so vehemently hates the CEO. I'm not sure where you put that on the financial sheet, but it's going to be interesting to see how this affects it going public.
Summoned from the underpants.