422
submitted 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

Summary

Representative Sarah McBride, the first out trans congresswoman, criticized Donald Trump’s executive order defining gender as strictly male or female.

McBride points out that biologically all embryos develop as female until the SRY gene activates weeks after conception.

The order, which ties gender to reproductive cells at conception, unintentionally categorizes all humans as female from conception based on biological facts.

McBride’s remarks highlight scientific flaws in the policy.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 1 points 5 minutes ago

Donvict and his supporters (yeah, I know, don't blame the precious voters!) don't really understand science.

[-] randon31415@lemmy.world 14 points 1 hour ago

Trump: "You must identify with the gender you were at the time of conception."

Science: "Everyone starts out as women and don't become men until 6 weeks after conception."

Trump: "That is exactly what I meant. Everyone who knows science must identify as a girly girl."

[-] prole 62 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

Anyone who thinks this shit is funny is in for a rude awakening.

They do not fucking care. They will use this the exact same way that they would have used it if it was worded correctly.

You don't get out on technicalities in fascism; if the autocrat in charge wants to do the thing, he will do it. All of these things will be used as cudgels against perceived political enemies, and marginalized US citizens.

[-] TheTux@lemmy.ml 2 points 30 minutes ago

This. In much the same way an elder god doesn't give a damn about conservation of energy or the square cubed law, a dictator with effectively un-checked power doesn't care about wording of executive orders or LAWS. Be careful.
Cthulu has woken from eons (4 years) of slumber (not being president) to ravage the planet, while looking like a moldy cheese puff.

[-] Absaroka@lemmy.world 80 points 4 hours ago

I'm not sure what is more disconcerting. That the people in charge truly are a bunch of fucking idiots.

Or that those idiots have outplayed and outsmarted the Democrats at damn near every turn for 20+ years.

[-] Monument@lemmy.sdf.org 25 points 3 hours ago

The President in particular is very much a figurehead — he wields no real power whatsoever. He is apparently chosen by the government, but the qualities he is required to display are not those of leadership but those of finely judged outrage. For this reason the President is always a controversial choice, always an infuriating but fascinating character. His job is not to wield power but to draw attention away from it.
– The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy, Douglas Adams

[-] ArtemisimetrA@lemmy.duck.cafe 5 points 2 hours ago

This assumes the Democrats aren't also keenly aware of what is happening and either doing a real sorry job of putting up any viable opposition or are in on the game. The two-party system is a front

[-] nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 109 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

Theres two possible interpretations due to the at conception bit I think. Either he made everyone a woman, or he abolished gender all together. Either way this EO make Trump the single largest gender changer in history as he just changed the gender of either ~150 million or ~300 million people.

[-] samus12345@lemm.ee 1 points 45 minutes ago

"At conception" leaves no room for interpretation - he abolished gender altogether.

[-] prole 19 points 3 hours ago

It's fun to think about the hypotheticals, but the reality here is that it does not matter the exact words in the EO. We know what they mean, and they won't let some silly technicality stop them.

[-] pachrist@lemmy.world 3 points 1 hour ago

E pluribus unum, baby.

[-] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 16 points 3 hours ago

I really would like to see some people ask for a divorce off the fact that they were married under false pretenses. They believed they were marrying a man.

[-] newthrowaway20@lemmy.world 93 points 5 hours ago
[-] usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.ml 64 points 4 hours ago

You've heard of non-binary gender, get ready for its upgraded form: unary gender

[-] Wogi@lemmy.world 21 points 4 hours ago

Ope we're all gay now. Time to grab the most outrageous outfit you can come up with and get in the parade everybody.

[-] ianhclark510 7 points 3 hours ago

Nope, you can still be straight if you’re attracted to males outside the US, executive orders aren’t worldwide

[-] Wogi@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago

They are in America! YEAH!!! MERICA!!!

[-] Nougat@fedia.io 30 points 4 hours ago

TWO GENDERS ENTER! ONE GENDER LEAVES!

[-] superkret@feddit.org 14 points 4 hours ago

Mad Musk: Beyond Genderdome

[-] kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world 18 points 4 hours ago

You kids are spoiled with all your gender identities. Back in my day, we only had one gender, and we were grateful for it!

[-] superkret@feddit.org 13 points 4 hours ago

You were lucky! We had to share a gender with everyone in the village!
And when that prick Jane had it, it always came back bent!

[-] CookieMonsterDebate@lemmy.world 4 points 4 hours ago

"Human Beings", like the Greendale mascot.

[-] Yondoza@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 hours ago

If you're not female, you're dead! Not a threat, just a fact.

[-] dojan@lemmy.world 7 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

For some reason this makes me think of the inscription on the One Ring.

[-] rockSlayer@lemmy.world 9 points 4 hours ago

It began with the forging of the Genders. Three were given to the Transgenders, eepy, wisest and fairest of all beings. Seven to the Non-binaries, great miners and craftsmen of the mountain halls. And nine, nine genders were gifted to the furry-folk, who above all else desire power. For within these genders was bound the strength and the will to govern each gay community. But they were all of them deceived, for another gender was made. Deep in the land of Mordor, in the Fires of Mount Doom, the Dark Lord Sauron forged a master gender, and into this gender he poured his cruelty, his malice and his will to dominate all life.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] floofloof@lemmy.ca 16 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

Its so stupid that the government of one of the world's most powerful countries is occupying itself trying to restrict people's healthcare and bathroom usage based on some poorly understood and arbitrary rules about zygotes. Meanwhile, the planet burns.

[-] usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.ml 28 points 5 hours ago

Bad headline IMO, she's more so pointing out more flaws in it which is different than laughing it off

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 41 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

"This is logically flawed because " won't really bother a bunch of Young Earth Creationists. You're arguing with people who will retreat to the baseline argument "because God said so" in a pinch. Getting into the messy details of embryonic development won't save you, because that's not how their nominations to the FBI, the DOJ, or the Federal Judiciary are going to interpret any of it.

[-] usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.ml 31 points 4 hours ago

Actually it being poorly written helps a lot with court challenge. That was one of the reasons why so much was overturned in his first administration. There was a fear that this time he'd sign better written executive orders that would survive challanges instead we're getting a lot of them like this

[-] fadingembers 2 points 1 hour ago

You think the supreme court won't side with whatever schlock trump puts out? You should listen to a few of their hearings. The ones on free speech and transgender issues are specifically telling.

[-] usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Not all cases make it up to SCOTUS. Massive numbers of suits are being filed right now, they can't take them all up with just 9 justices. Many of these lawsuit are intentionally filed in places with more dem appointees on the district and appeals courts

SCOTUS is insane, but they are also not in lock step with Trump. They have their own agenda that often align with Trump but not always. For instance, they just ruled 9-0 on the TikTok ban while Trump was calling for the courts to rule the opposite way

We won't we every fight, but there's fights we can win. Use every tool we can against them

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 1 points 28 minutes ago

For instance, they just ruled 9-0 on the TikTok ban while Trump was calling for the courts to rule the opposite way

https://newrepublic.com/post/190366/gorsuch-supreme-court-tiktok-ban

“But the question we face today is not the law’s wisdom, only its constitutionality. Given just a handful of days after oral argument to issue an opinion, I cannot profess the kind of certainty I would like to have about the arguments and record before us. All I can say is that, at this time and under these constraints, the problem appears real and the response to it not unconstitutional,” Gorsuch continued

[-] cannibalkitteh 13 points 4 hours ago

The truth is, they don't care how poorly written it is, they're just trying to flood the zone with stuff, and they win no matter the outcome. If it's not challenged, they have policy, if it is challenged, it occupies time and resources and most importantly, if it's challenged unsuccessfully, they have legal precident.

[-] usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.ml 11 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

it is challenged, it occupies time and resources

It also takes up their time and resources to which I say: good. Slow it all down

They'd rather be able to steam roll through it all. Make them waste time defending everything so they can't sue as much about things they do care about or move on to putting other things in effect

[-] mister_flibble@lemm.ee 8 points 4 hours ago

This is where I'm at too. Even rubber stamping shit takes a non zero amount of time. We should be bouncing back anything that has so much as a misplaced comma, let alone shit like this.

[-] prole 2 points 3 hours ago

No it doesn't slow them down. They will do the fucking thing anyway. Why do you think they'd stop just because they used the wrong wording?

Who the fuck is going to stop them?

[-] usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 hours ago

It has slowed them before. Make them have to keep rewriting it to survive challenges

Make them deal with the companies who don't trust the next admin won't just go the opposite way. Apple for instance is keeping TikTok delisted from the App Store despite trump trying to extend it

Make them have to deal with federal worker strikes

Make them have to deal with local & state officals who won't comply with invalid orders

There is a fight. Don't let them get away without one

[-] prole 1 points 58 minutes ago* (last edited 57 minutes ago)

It has slowed them before. Make them have to keep rewriting it to survive challenges

How is it not already abundantly clear that this is not "before." There is no precedent for what is currently happening

Who "makes" them exactly? This is fascism now. The person with the biggest army gets what they want, and everyone else better shut the fuck up or die.

[-] ProvableGecko@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago

It also takes up their time and resources

It's YOUR TIME AND RESOURCES! They do it on public employee time and with tax money. They are weaponizing the state against the people. There isn't an upside to this.

[-] usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 hours ago

So stand down and never fight? Absolutely not

There is a fight, don't let them go without one

Progress will happen at the local and state level. The goal at the federal level is damage control

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] superkret@feddit.org 4 points 4 hours ago

And every challenge is a chance to kick it up all the way to the Supreme Court where it can be enshrined as constitutional precedent.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] prole 2 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

This exactly. It's disconcerting to see how many people seem to be laughing this off.

They have zero interest in logic and consistency. We know what they mean, the actual words they used don't matter.

[-] zabadoh@ani.social 6 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

We'd all better march down to the DMV and update our genders then...

It's required by imperial edict now.

[-] Kaput@lemmy.world 6 points 3 hours ago

No! That's where the pants pocket removal squads will get you.

[-] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 3 points 3 hours ago

Isn’t that every despot’s idea, though? Make all laws used to control people nebulous enough that they can be applied to anyone for whatever reason? Just because it’s inept doesn’t mean it isn’t useful.

[-] ATDA@lemmy.world 3 points 3 hours ago

Trump scientifically and detail obtuse, color me derped!

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 22 Jan 2025
422 points (100.0% liked)

politics

19455 readers
3169 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS