48

Apparently, the PC I was given by my employer less than a year ago is too out of date (uses Windows 10) and I have to have Windows 11 now for security reasons. I have a gaming PC, but it's my partner's, too, and it'd be a huge waste of its power and graphics card, plus it'd have to be moved. I really don't want to do that.

A new company owns the company I work for now, but still. This is not what I agreed to. Ugh. I'm so annoyed.

It's not that expensive, really ($200), but it's the principle of the matter. How long will it be before they force me to do this again, anyway??? I already get paid a shit wage.

top 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] DFX4509B_2@lemmy.org 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I'd buy the new PC so that your own PC can actually be your own still and your work stuff can be relegated to that new PC.

There's plenty of really good reason to not mix work and pleasure on your main PC, your employer or school effectively taking ownership of your main, personal system being one big one.

Optionally, I'd also just start looking for new work if you work for a BYOD place.

[-] lady_maria@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

yeah... unfortunately, this is what I ended up doing. I guess I knew I'd have to leave this job eventually, but I'm really loving remote work.

they ended up having seemingly absurd requirements (I9 processor or greater) for what's basically a desktop phone. I guess it's a bargain... we're getting a good processor out of it. my partner thankfully knows how to build PCs.

[-] DFX4509B_2@lemmy.org 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

An i9 for a work PC? Seriously? What did they think you were going to do, compile massive amounts of code all day? Even my current CPU, an R5 4500, is probably overkill for basic office tasks (but it's perfectly adequate for gaming on if you're not interested in the latest AAA slop), and it's truly a low-end part, but an i9 or R9 for basic office tasks is ridiculous.

[-] lady_maria@lemmy.world 1 points 23 hours ago

ikr? as far as I know, the most taxing program on it would be a VoIP. I guess maybe it's an attempt to get them to last as long as possible? that's my only guess.

[-] Gerudo@lemm.ee 47 points 3 weeks ago

Do NOT, I repeat, do NOT use your own device. You most likely will have to install software packages onto the machine that can and will track everything you do, at the bare minimum on the work account, and potentially the entire system. You don't want to run the risk of the company having access to your personal stuff.

There are also a lot of legal words that work their way into contracts that state things like "anything done on a work related machine is the property of the company". Don't risk it, fight them to get them to provide a work device.

[-] vk6flab@lemmy.radio 28 points 3 weeks ago

You are under no obligation to use your personal equipment and I wouldn't.

Who owns the company PC you are currently using? How much is it worth? Likely it's part of the corporate IT fleet and is covered by a support contract. What does that cover? What happens if it gets damaged, who pays for what?

[-] reallykindasorta@slrpnk.net 24 points 3 weeks ago

If you’re in the US and you are an employee (not a contractor) your employer has to supply you with the tools to do your job. Sorry they’re pulling this.

[-] BertramDitore@lemm.ee 23 points 3 weeks ago

If their reason is truly for security, then having you use your own personal computer is a terrible idea! Enterprise hardware and software systems exist for many reasons, and keeping work and personal separate is not an insignificant one for us WFH folks. Do they really want you logging into secure systems from hardware they have no control over? Seems like an unnecessary liability for them.

And if when you got the job you were told that equipment would be provided, then they cannot expect you to even have your own PC let alone one that meets their security requirements.

This would piss me off so much, sorry they’re putting you through this bullshit.

[-] Hossenfeffer@feddit.uk 22 points 3 weeks ago

No. This is a con. An employer has to provide the necessary equipment to do the job. If they're prepared to try this on they won't hesitate to shaft you at a later date.

[-] Brkdncr@lemmy.world 19 points 3 weeks ago

Tell them you don’t have a pc.

[-] BuboScandiacus@mander.xyz 18 points 3 weeks ago

They should pay for your work computer

[-] recursive_recursion@lemmy.ca 16 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

When I initially saw the post title I was going to provide recommendations for building one but after reading your situation I agree with the rest of the commentors here.

Your work/boss requiring you to BYOC is a HUGE red flag. If anything, I'd also recommend asking for a stipend that would fully cover the expense for a computer, if they say no and tell you to bring the one you have from home say no. They cannot force you to bring your own computer for work.

In the worst case scenario that they choose to be idiotic and fire you for saying no then you will be obligated for severance and/or unemployment insurance if I remember correctly.

Edit:
*I made grammar revisions for this comment

[-] pixxelkick@lemmy.world 10 points 3 weeks ago

I have to have Windows 11 now for security reasons.

Can.. you not upgrade your current work machine to win11?

Just tell them that you'll send them back the laptop for the upgrade if you have to, or IT can do it remotely, but you dont have another PC to use, that's why you had one issued.

They only way I would use my personal PC is if I am VPN+RDPing into a work machine, and that's it. I've done that many times before, as that's secure and doesn't have any work resources on your oc itself, you're just remotely connecting to your actual work PC over a secure vpn.

That's the only scenario that I use my personal PC for work.

[-] dingus@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

My laptop doesn't support upgrading to win 11 because of its processor. You can hack your way around shit like that, but it takes some doing.

[-] clubb@lemmy.world 6 points 3 weeks ago

I'm sorry if I misunderstood, english is not my first language, but what stops you from upgrading the laptop from work to win 11?

[-] Hegz@lemmy.ca 4 points 3 weeks ago

Very much this. It's been a free upgrade for windows 10 for a good long while now.

[-] adarza@lemmy.ca 4 points 3 weeks ago

Apparently, the PC I was given by my employer less than a year ago is too out of date (uses Windows 10) and I have to have Windows 11 now for security reasons.

upgrade this to 11 if the hardware is compatible. don't do anything else other than click the button in windows update for it. that much won't cost you a penny.

(back up the important data, bookmarks, etc. first, just in case windows update wants to crap all over your system)

nearly every pc sold new from the major manufacturers in the last decade is compatible with windows 11 system requirements. it may need a bios setting changed to enable a hardware feature windows 11 'needs' to have.

if what they provided in 2024 was actually a 10+ year old pc.. then, i dunno. definitely push back a bit there. win 10 doesn't go 'end of life' til october, so you have time to discuss things with them. there is also an optional program to give a win10 system updates past then (not free. iirc, $30-some first year. more in yrs 2 and 3 if wanted).

if you need new and you're unsure if you'll get reimbursed or reimbursed right away. don't go crazy. go 'acceptable' for the task-at-hand, and as inexpensively as possible.

if you're in the us, walmart has a basic asus laptop for $249 (8gb/256ssd core i3).

i highly recommend keeping 'work' pc and stuff separate from 'home' and 'play' stuff and systems. work on a work pc, do everything else on something else.

[-] dingus@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

Many are compatible, yes, but I wouldn't say nearly every one is compatible. My laptop is from 2018 and is not compatible because Microsoft doesn't like my processor. Despite the fact that I'm sure it would run win 11 just fine.

[-] ocean@lemmy.selfhostcat.com 3 points 3 weeks ago

Easiest way might just to be running an windows 11 vm and they won’t know

this post was submitted on 10 Jan 2025
48 points (100.0% liked)

Casual Conversation

2091 readers
115 users here now

Share a story, ask a question, or start a conversation about (almost) anything you desire. Maybe you'll make some friends in the process.


RULES (updated 01/22/25)

  1. Be respectful: no harassment, hate speech, bigotry, and/or trolling. To be concise, disrespect is defined by escalation.
  2. Encourage conversation in your OP. This means including heavily implicative subject matter when you can and also engaging in your thread when possible. You won't be punished for trying.
  3. Avoid controversial topics (politics or societal debates come to mind, though we are not saying not to talk about anything that resembles these). There's a guide in the protocol book offered as a mod model that can be used for that; it's vague until you realize it was made for things like the rule in question. At least four purple answers must apply to a "controversial" message for it to be allowed.
  4. Keep it clean and SFW: No illegal content or anything gross and inappropriate. A rule of thumb is if a recording of a conversation put on another platform would get someone a COPPA violation response, that exact exchange should be avoided when possible.
  5. No solicitation such as ads, promotional content, spam, surveys etc. The chart redirected to above applies to spam material as well, which is one of the reasons its wording is vague, as it applies to a few things. Again, a "spammy" message must be applicable to four purple answers before it's allowed.
  6. Respect privacy as well as truth: Don’t ask for or share any personal information or slander anyone. A rule of thumb is if something is enough info to go by that it "would be a copyright violation if the info was art" as another group put it, or that it alone can be used to narrow someone down to 150 physical humans (Dunbar's Number) or less, it's considered an excess breach of privacy. Slander is defined by intentional utilitarian misguidance at the expense (positive or negative) of a sentient entity. This often links back to or mixes with rule one, which implies, for example, that even something that is true can still amount to what slander is trying to achieve, and that will be looked down upon.

Casual conversation communities:

Related discussion-focused communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS