326
submitted 16 hours ago by compostgoblin@slrpnk.net to c/memes@lemmy.ml
all 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] mortemtyrannis@lemmy.ml 9 points 7 hours ago

This was pretty much what set me on the path to radicalisation.

The system felt so unfair and then to learn that there were people who could do exactly this just because they were born into a family with large capital it was infuriating.

[-] 1SimpleTailor@startrek.website 3 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

That's why I dislike these kinds of memes that say, "Oh, I shouldn't be working all day; I should be living a life of leisure and free to create".They feel like the conservative strawman of the "lazy leftist who just envies the rich".

Living as the meme describes inherently requires the exploitation of labor. Unless a society becomes technologically advanced enough to achieve fully automated post-scarcity, meeting a person's needs still requires a certain amount of human labor. The issue under capitalism is that some people do live as the meme describes, and they do so by exploiting the labor of others through capital. As a result, the rest of us struggle even more.

[-] Allonzee@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

Hey want to throw up? Here's a Koch heir using daddy's blood money to be a pretend "creative."

https://youtu.be/QEw0Whi73C0?si=ivxFFl68pa3XkdKb

[-] TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com 23 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

One doesn't even get to focus on paying just for oneself.

One has to pay for Zuck/Bezos/Musk/Cook/Trump first.

[-] tyo_ukko@sopuli.xyz 31 points 16 hours ago

Has there ever been a time in human history where we were just allowed to exist for our passions and not work for survival? Our economic system definitely has its flaws, but this meme paints with too broad strokes.

[-] alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml 6 points 7 hours ago

You don't work merely for your own survival under capitalism, most of your labor goes to supporting the capitalist class (and bombing foreigners to keep resources cheap so those capitalists can make even more money).

Half a century ago, working in a grocery store was enough to buy a home, raise a family, and put a kid through college. The job did not get less productive, if anything each worker produces more than ever with automation, but a greater share goes to the capitalist class, both through stagnant wages and increasing costs.

[-] EldritchFeminity 5 points 9 hours ago

If we're talking specifically about art, historically, there was the patronage system where wealthy people would pay artists that they liked to largely just spend their days painting whatever they liked. It wasn't something every artist could take advantage of (Van Gogh died a poor pauper because his paintings basically didn't sell at all until after his death, for example), but it did exist.

Also, genuine question if anybody knows, what about the philosophers of old? Did they get paid as teachers of their school of theory or something?

It's not like there was ever a time when people simply didn't work at all, but there is a large portion of the population today who don't feel like their work is anything other than busywork with no reason to it, and that makes them miserable even doing something that they love. There are people out there who love picking up garbage for a living because they know that they're doing something that makes a difference.

[-] School_Lunch@lemmy.world 8 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

The Renaissance was a time of a vast labor shortage. This allowed workers to demand higher wages, and it also allowed leisure time to study new things and make new art.

[-] tyo_ukko@sopuli.xyz 5 points 15 hours ago

This is true also when you have strong unions to bargain for good benefits. Still, you need to do some work, as opposed to the message of the meme "you have to pay for being alive".

[-] metaStatic@kbin.earth 5 points 13 hours ago

Unions are a band aid solution to capital exploitation.

it's still in their best interest to oppose automation so members can continue to work pointless jobs for a wage.

[-] Asafum@feddit.nl 9 points 14 hours ago

Was talking to a friend about AI and job loss and eventually he says something about "those people in the past talking about reducing the population" unfortunately being possibly necessary... I think he was referring to some things written on the Georgia guidestones, but Jesus fucking Christ...

Essentially "How many people are allowed to live is entirely dependent on how much labor Mr.Money needs."

🤮 🤮 🤮 🤮

[-] ganymede@lemmy.ml 4 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

innovating or being less wasteful??

(·•᷄_•᷅ )

arguing to reduce the population so the privileged can have even more privilege?

( ˶ˆᗜˆ˵ )

[-] Skullgrid@lemmy.world 10 points 16 hours ago

butt in gommunism, you think you'll be a poet, but you'll work in a mine.

[-] DurbanPoison@feddit.nl 8 points 12 hours ago

in capitalism I wanted to be an astronaut, but now I have a substance abuse problem and write spaghetti code for a corporate machine that would not give a shit if I dropped dead tomorrow.

[-] lowleveldata@lemmy.world 3 points 15 hours ago

you "only" need to pay for being alive instead of going around hunting all days fighting boars and shits

this post was submitted on 09 Jan 2025
326 points (100.0% liked)

Memes

46031 readers
1267 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS