161
top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] BarrelAgedBoredom@lemm.ee 28 points 2 weeks ago
[-] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 11 points 2 weeks ago

*Nower days

[-] SARGE@startrek.website 20 points 2 weeks ago

The angled DOD seal to reflect Walter's slightly down turned head is a nice touch

[-] TheMightyCanuck@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 weeks ago

It's the little details that can really make a meme

[-] ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works 17 points 2 weeks ago

ICBMs missing their targets tends to mean more ICBMs get fired.

And at a certain point the targets really don't matter.

At a certain point just build a nuke big enough to take the whole planet and u dont need a launch system, but remember to tell ur opponent about it....

[-] usrtrv@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 weeks ago

Exactly, restart Project Sundial.

[-] tfw_no_toiletpaper@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago
[-] Natanael@slrpnk.net 9 points 2 weeks ago

If astronomers can cancel them out then other sensors can too

Yeah but they do long exposure pictures, not time critical navigation.

[-] skulblaka@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 weeks ago

Wouldn't this be very easy to defeat with just a star chart? If they were also able to remove stars from view, sure, I might get where you're going with this. But adding extra stars? That's just noise that can be ignored if you know what the stars are supposed to look like. Match up existing stars with yesterday's chart and anything that doesn't appear on the chart is discarded.

I dont know where the cuting edge startracker tech is nower days, but in the first cold war this stuff was borderline analog. Basically lining up some light sensors with tubes on them into the position of the stars u wanted to track. If then lets say one star turns into 2 stars (one is just a reflection of a sat) then the chance of fucking up tracking could be 50/50.

But yeah today theres gona be probably 3-12 cameras and some digital wiz calculations, but i doubt that most legacy ICBM systems are upgraded to that.

[-] nBodyProblem@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

If we are talking realistically, star trackers in space are just good for orientation data, not position. Modern ring-laser gyros have low very drift rates. ICBM flight times are short.

Assuming the military cares to retrofit a modern IMU, I doubt a star tracker is the least bit necessary for a good navigational fix.

[-] Trollception@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 weeks ago

This is great. A way to stop ICBMs is priceless.

[-] DrDystopia@lemy.lol 2 points 2 weeks ago
this post was submitted on 14 Dec 2024
161 points (100.0% liked)

NonCredibleDefense

6796 readers
228 users here now

A community for your defence shitposting needs

Rules

1. Be niceDo not make personal attacks against each other, call for violence against anyone, or intentionally antagonize people in the comment sections.

2. Explain incorrect defense articles and takes

If you want to post a non-credible take, it must be from a "credible" source (news article, politician, or military leader) and must have a comment laying out exactly why it's non-credible. Low-hanging fruit such as random Twitter and YouTube comments belong in the Matrix chat.

3. Content must be relevant

Posts must be about military hardware or international security/defense. This is not the page to fawn over Youtube personalities, simp over political leaders, or discuss other areas of international policy.

4. No racism / hatespeech

No slurs. No advocating for the killing of people or insulting them based on physical, religious, or ideological traits.

5. No politics

We don't care if you're Republican, Democrat, Socialist, Stalinist, Baathist, or some other hot mess. Leave it at the door. This applies to comments as well.

6. No seriousposting

We don't want your uncut war footage, fundraisers, credible news articles, or other such things. The world is already serious enough as it is.

7. No classified material

Classified ‘western’ information is off limits regardless of how "open source" and "easy to find" it is.

8. Source artwork

If you use somebody's art in your post or as your post, the OP must provide a direct link to the art's source in the comment section, or a good reason why this was not possible (such as the artist deleting their account). The source should be a place that the artist themselves uploaded the art. A booru is not a source. A watermark is not a source.

9. No low-effort posts

No egregiously low effort posts. E.g. screenshots, recent reposts, simple reaction & template memes, and images with the punchline in the title. Put these in weekly Matrix chat instead.

10. Don't get us banned

No brigading or harassing other communities. Do not post memes with a "haha people that I hate died… haha" punchline or violating the sh.itjust.works rules (below). This includes content illegal in Canada.

11. No misinformation

NCD exists to make fun of misinformation, not to spread it. Make outlandish claims, but if your take doesn’t show signs of satire or exaggeration it will be removed. Misleading content may result in a ban. Regardless of source, don’t post obvious propaganda or fake news. Double-check facts and don't be an idiot.


Join our Matrix chatroom


Other communities you may be interested in


Banner made by u/Fertility18

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS