725
submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

Summary

Reddit is removing posts linking to Luigi Mangione’s manifesto, citing its longstanding policy against content related to violent acts.

The manifesto, tied to the suspected killer of UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson, has sparked online fascination and debate.

While Reddit allows discussion of the manifesto within its rules, posts linking to its full text—shared on Substack by journalist Ken Klippenstein—are being removed, angering users.

Critics accuse Reddit of selective moderation, as some sympathize with Mangione’s frustrations over the U.S. healthcare system, which has come under renewed scrutiny after the incident.

top 47 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] IDKWhatUsernametoPutHereLolol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 174 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Supposedly his manifesto, we don't even have enough souces to confirm nor deny its legitimacy because mainstream media doesn't want to talk about it.

[-] xtr0n@sh.itjust.works 67 points 2 months ago

A defense attorney on tictok made a really convincing argument about the wording being inconsistent with a well educated author. She pointed out examples of convoluted language that read more like an average person trying to create what they think a smart and highly educated person would write. I am now convinced that the manifesto was planted.

[-] IDKWhatUsernametoPutHereLolol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 38 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Possibly.

Unless there's an independent, non-government funded, reputable handwriting expert to examine the writing, and compare it to any known writings he made (example: his handwriting in school assignments), I'm gonna be sus of this.

[-] ccunning@lemmy.world 32 points 2 months ago

You know our president elect graduated from a “prestigious” school, right?

I’ve had enough bosses with degrees to know they’ll give them to any old dumbass (especially if they have the right ‘profile’ or connections)

[-] xtr0n@sh.itjust.works 34 points 2 months ago

I’m well aware that everyone with a degree from a fancy school isn’t smart or capable. In this case, we’ve seen many examples of the guy’s writing. Moreover, he was valedictorian at his prep school and got an advanced degree in computer science. I think it’s reasonable to conclude that he is smart and well educated.

[-] DokPsy@lemmy.world 13 points 2 months ago

That doesn't exactly equate to constantly writing well. I've met many engineers and scientists (computer or otherwise) who couldn't give 2 shits about proper English unless it was specifically for a grade, sending to clients, or publication.

Educated doesn't mean that you stop writing informally. It just means you're able to write formally.

[-] xtr0n@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 months ago

For language skills, I think being valedictorian at a competitive prep school is more relevant, since that would require more high quality writing (and discussion of writing) on a consistent basis than any CS program at any level. Regardless, it’s true that no credentials are going to guarantee that someone will never write crap. In this case, we do have examples of casual writing from the suspect (goodreads, twitter) and they generally avoid the kinds of things that the lawyer noted in her video (contradictory language, overly wrought prose). Even if her analysis wouldn’t apply to every person who managed to graduate from an Ivy, to me, in this case, it 100% rings true.

[-] laurelraven@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 months ago

Yeah, and not to mention tonally discordant, I couldn't get a sense of a single writing voice or style. It bounces between looks-like-maybe-formal to completely informal and back in the span of a sentence or two.

Now, it being handwritten and if he wrote it in a hurry, maybe that could account for it, not really any time or ability to proofread, but I have my doubts.

[-] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 37 points 2 months ago

And as far as Manifestos go, it's really more of a postcard.

[-] Today@lemmy.world 17 points 2 months ago

Yeah, they keep calling it a 3 page manifesto. One of the people interviewed said it's just 3 pages with writing on them, not like paragraph after paragraph for 3 pages.

Kids these days, not even an entire book-length manifesto like they used to write. SMH My Head 🙄

[-] bobs_monkey@lemm.ee 89 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Considering reddit now has shareholders to answer to, and also considering u/spez is a greedy little pig boy, this tracks and should be of no surprise to anyone.

[-] ninjabard@lemmy.world 44 points 2 months ago
[-] Exusia@lemmy.world 12 points 2 months ago

Aye, fuck spez

[-] IAmTheZeke@lemmy.world 21 points 2 months ago

Silly greedy pig boy

[-] tywarth@lemmy.world 57 points 2 months ago

I've seen people get murdered on Reddit. Why aren't they removing those videos?

[-] comfy@lemmy.ml 31 points 2 months ago

If you look at each wave of subreddit removals, it's only after it gets sufficient news coverage. That's why they aren't removing those videos.

[-] dan@upvote.au 11 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Plus they're likely removing things that advertisers don't like, so if it gets less coverage, advertisers are less likely to notice and report it.

[-] islands@lemmy.cafe 49 points 2 months ago

Spaz is worried that people give enough of a shit about him to target him. No one cares about Spez. He runs an internet forum. He has weird dystopian power fantasies where he owns slaves. The dude is a joke.

https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2017/01/30/doomsday-prep-for-the-super-rich

[-] Paddzr@lemmy.world 48 points 2 months ago

No he isn't.

Let's not act like bunch of idiots. It's all about money. If advertisers see posts they don't like, do you think they want to see their brand next to a post about Luigi?

WE CANNOT BE THIS STUPID. It's how they win. You might be making that comment as a gag or joke, but many clearly aren't reading it as such. The answer is ALWAYS money.

[-] prole 5 points 2 months ago

You are correct, but the rest of their comment is sadly true.

[-] prole 4 points 2 months ago

Fuck Steve Huffman

[-] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 43 points 2 months ago

“Longstanding”

Which longstanding? Reddit for the longest time had links to all kinds of gore and violence, and still did when I last happened across some before I left. “Longstanding” must mean “since we decided to enforce an interpretation of it when we wanted to go public.”

[-] Sabata11792@ani.social 14 points 2 months ago

"The shareholders demanded we lie to keep advertisers"

[-] Belgdore@lemm.ee 3 points 2 months ago

Longstanding means since Reddit went public (or since Reddit started gearing up to go public)

[-] crystalmerchant@lemmy.world 26 points 2 months ago

Be a real shame if someone posted it here

[-] robocall@lemmy.world 26 points 2 months ago

“To the Feds, I’ll keep this short, because I do respect what you do for our country. To save you a lengthy investigation, I state plainly that I wasn’t working with anyone. This was fairly trivial: some elementary social engineering, basic CAD, a lot of patience. The spiral notebook, if present, has some straggling notes and To Do lists that illuminate the gist of it. My tech is pretty locked down because I work in engineering so probably not much info there. I do apologize for any strife of traumas but it had to be done. Frankly, these parasites simply had it coming. A reminder: the US has the #1 most expensive healthcare system in the world, yet we rank roughly #42 in life expectancy. United is the [indecipherable] largest company in the US by market cap, behind only Apple, Google, Walmart. It has grown and grown, but has our life expectancy? No the reality is, these [indecipherable] have simply gotten too powerful, and they continue to abuse our country for immense profit because the American public has allowed them to get away with it. Obviously the problem is more complex, but I do not have space, and frankly I do not pretend to be the most qualified person to lay out the full argument. But many have illuminated the corruption and greed (e.g.: Rosenthal, Moore), decades ago and the problems simply remain. It is not an issue of awareness at this point, but clearly power games at play. Evidently I am the first to face it with such brutal honesty.”

[-] robocall@lemmy.world 21 points 2 months ago

law enforcement has been circulating their own typed copy of the manifesto because it's based off of hand written notes. I'm not sure if any journalists have seen a photo or the original "manifesto"

Reddit and mainstream media's censorship of this story is all about controlling the narrative.

[-] evilcultist@sh.itjust.works 14 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

There’s an Atlantic article by Charlie Warzel that references it to try to make his comments seem flippant. The news is heavily trying to create or avoid a narrative on this.

“When Mangione was caught, he had with him a note or manifesto of sorts, less than 300 words long. Near the beginning, it offers the following: “This was fairly trivial.” The phrase is cold, detached, and haunting. It might merely be the garden-variety bravado of a gunman. But the sentence also conjures a possibility that is much harder to sit with (and for the internet to latch onto). Of all the possible outcomes available, the least shared, argued over, and considered is one that the shooter alludes to himself—that what feels to all of us like an era-defining event may ultimately be unremarkable in its brutality, in its inability to effect change, and in how quickly everyone moves on.”

I feel like either of these interpretations is way off the mark. The phrase is more likely him suggesting that it doesn’t take a lot of work or a sharp mind to pull it off, which would be a nightmare for anyone trying to keep it from happening again.

[-] DokPsy@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

If the transcript I've seen floating around is accurate, the phrase "this was fairly trivial" absolutely was about how difficult it was to pull off. The lines above and below it talk about super basic social engineering that anyone could do and the hard part of the tool engineering has already been done.

[-] MonkeyBusiness@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 months ago

That reads like a sophisticated version of something a primetime Fox News anchor would say to control how their viewers understand an event. The author picked one specific line to quote and twisted the meaning to assassinate Mangione's character and obfuscate the rest of the letter. It's straight propaganda.

[-] insaan@leftopia.org 4 points 2 months ago

The Atlantic is just sophisticated propaganda for elites.

[-] ccunning@lemmy.world 20 points 2 months ago

CEOs be circling the wagons rn

[-] venusaur@lemmy.world 18 points 2 months ago
[-] robocall@lemmy.world 61 points 2 months ago

“To the Feds, I’ll keep this short, because I do respect what you do for our country. To save you a lengthy investigation, I state plainly that I wasn’t working with anyone. This was fairly trivial: some elementary social engineering, basic CAD, a lot of patience. The spiral notebook, if present, has some straggling notes and To Do lists that illuminate the gist of it. My tech is pretty locked down because I work in engineering so probably not much info there. I do apologize for any strife of traumas but it had to be done. Frankly, these parasites simply had it coming. A reminder: the US has the #1 most expensive healthcare system in the world, yet we rank roughly #42 in life expectancy. United is the [indecipherable] largest company in the US by market cap, behind only Apple, Google, Walmart. It has grown and grown, but has our life expectancy? No the reality is, these [indecipherable] have simply gotten too powerful, and they continue to abuse our country for immense profit because the American public has allowed them to get away with it. Obviously the problem is more complex, but I do not have space, and frankly I do not pretend to be the most qualified person to lay out the full argument. But many have illuminated the corruption and greed (e.g.: Rosenthal, Moore), decades ago and the problems simply remain. It is not an issue of awareness at this point, but clearly power games at play. Evidently I am the first to face it with such brutal honesty.”

[-] MonkeyBusiness@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 months ago

Wow. All he was missing at the end was, "I keep it real!"

[-] JesusTheCarpenter@feddit.uk 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

You didn't answer the question brah.

/s

EDIT: Honestly, sometimes people don't pick up sarcasm.

[-] Amanduh@lemm.ee 14 points 2 months ago

I mean they did? They posted the manifesto and therefore answered yes.

[-] ramsorge@discuss.online 2 points 2 months ago

With your username, it would be hard to assume you are being sarcastic about anything.

[-] Tangent5280@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago

I've seen it many times here.

[-] yarr@feddit.nl 16 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Classic Reddit: "Reddit is meant to be a bastion of free speech"

2024 Reddit: "All hail corporate! Click on more ads!"

[-] 1985MustangCobra@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

classic reddit wasn't even about any type of speech(in the comments), it was a news aggregator site. Once it became "social media" it went off the fucking rails.

[-] JoYo@lemmy.ml 14 points 2 months ago

the manifesto is fake anyways. the NYPD wrote it and y’all just believe anything they tell you. fucking monopoly money? that’s some batman villain shit only a blue blood could think of.

[-] MapleEngineer@lemmy.world 12 points 2 months ago

They're afraid.

Good.

[-] selokichtli@lemmy.ml 9 points 2 months ago

Is Spez a CEO now?

[-] TheObviousSolution@lemm.ee 4 points 2 months ago

This thread appearing on lemmy.world is a case of the pot calling the kettle black.

[-] Gammelfisch@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

Fuck Reddit.

this post was submitted on 13 Dec 2024
725 points (100.0% liked)

News

25286 readers
3380 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS