231
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Joshi@aussie.zone 8 points 4 months ago

While I think that legalisation, or at least decriminalisation, for personal use is probably the right policy decision I agree with Elton to a degree.

Currently there is a fairly well established cultural belief at least in English speaking countries that marijuana is not addictive, not dangerous to health, and not problematic at all.

The belief that marijuana is largely harmless persists despite the fact that we all know people who smoke excessively to the point of making their lives worse and if they come to this realisation they find it incredibly difficult to stop.

Criminalisation of marijuana, especially combined with over policing of specific communities as occurred in the USA, is a disaster. But not recognising the very real harms that marijuana does to some peoples lives is also a disaster.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Serinus@lemmy.world 8 points 4 months ago

It can make sense if you flesh it out. The headline and two lines the musician said about it are shallow, but there's a grain of truth in there.

I do believe that overuse of marijuana is going to be a negative. Kids under 24 using marijuana is going to be a negative. And both of those are going to increase with legalization.

Neither are as harmful as prohibition, but they're still harmful.

Potheads don't need to be on quite the same level as alcoholism, but it should be closer than it is. If you're not acknowledging the harm of using the legal system to enforce this, his quote makes sense. He may not have stated it well.

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] Endymion_Mallorn@kbin.melroy.org 4 points 4 months ago

Finally we agree.

[-] HEXN3T 4 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

And now he's out of my library.

"This is informative and unfortunate."

[-] tragicinfo@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago

What does this aging fossil have to say that's important?

[-] CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social 4 points 4 months ago

I mean, sure, its addictive and unhealthy. But, the people suffering from it are the people that take it in the first place, so, banning personal possession and use is effectively punishing the victims, adding more suffering which may drive some to seek more drugs to get through. And if you instead ban production and distribution, you simply create a perfect niche for organized crime to appear to do those things, which creates worse problems than the drugs themselves. If such drugs dont force those involved with them to hide, at least it is possible to put some regulations on them, and more easily monitor and intervene in their use.

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago

I tend to agree, but not for the typical reason...

I'm a cynic. Legal weed opens the door to a new industry with all the worst aspects of big pharma and big tobacco all rolled up into one.

What could possibly go wrong?

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago

What could possibly go wrong?

Sick people getting what they need?

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 12 Dec 2024
231 points (100.0% liked)

Not The Onion

15937 readers
1238 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS