1253
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] kat_angstrom@lemmy.world 299 points 3 weeks ago

Toxic positivity in action

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] huginn@feddit.it 228 points 3 weeks ago

The stressed employees were almost certainly the high performers lmao

[-] Dogiedog64@lemmy.world 59 points 3 weeks ago

And when output and production drop 35% next quarter, you can be damn sure they'll whip out the "We're a family here!!!" talk as they announce even more layoffs to pad the bottom line.

[-] rabber@lemmy.ca 191 points 3 weeks ago

Whenever you are having a bad day just remember you had like 1/4 chance of spawning in India

[-] jerkface@lemmy.ca 99 points 3 weeks ago

There are ten livestock animals in captivity for every one human. You're still lucky to be born a human anywhere on earth, because we are the monsters.

[-] JustJack23@slrpnk.net 15 points 3 weeks ago

Why is India that way?

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] subterfuge@lemmy.world 147 points 3 weeks ago

“The beatings will continue until morale improves.”

[-] Railcar8095@lemm.ee 45 points 3 weeks ago

"Beatings didn't work. Let's try hunger and homelessness"

[-] EABOD25@lemm.ee 142 points 3 weeks ago

Well, that is going to backfire because they just made all new stress for the current employees

[-] SanctimoniousApe@lemmings.world 92 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Yeah, they did, but the remaining employees won't dare complain about it so management sees this as a twofer win.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 123 points 3 weeks ago

Don't ever engage with culture sensing surveys honestly. The only place they weren't a trap (ironically) was the US Army where they did it on paper, punished people for putting their names on them, and walked right past your entire immediate chain of command to their bosses with the results. And the one time things were truly bad they literally brought in a Sociology expert to study our unit and figure out how things had gone bad, it resulted in all new leadership and team building exercises, in a war zone. (These results do not extend to other branches, I had one done by the Navy and it was corpo trap bullshit, got a lot of the Army guys there by surprise.)

[-] whoisearth@lemmy.ca 43 points 3 weeks ago

Or engage with them but expect the repercussions.

I'm very candid when this shit comes around my corp and am extremely nuanced in explaining the culture challenges.

The trick is to not explicitly call anyone out and highlight it's a systemic problem.

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 18 points 3 weeks ago

That's a very fine line though. and you're hoping they don't fire you just for being the bent nail.

[-] whoisearth@lemmy.ca 16 points 3 weeks ago

Oh I agree but thing is it's principles for me. I spoke to a coworker recently about this in relation to a bad worker and if they should go to HR. My argument is I can't rely on other people to speak about the challenges so it's beholden on me to do that for those that may not want to take that risk.

It's only a job. I make damn good money but if I got let go because of my principles that's a good reason.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Draedron@lemmy.dbzer0.com 28 points 3 weeks ago

I have always engaged with every one of them and have been negative quite often yet never anything bad came of it. Probably because we have employee rights where I live. So the actual problem is americas lacks of rights.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Mubelotix@jlai.lu 122 points 3 weeks ago

Imagine firing all competent employees

[-] Dasus@lemmy.world 42 points 3 weeks ago

The stoner dudes high as balls 247 who don't give a shit and are not stressed a bit: :DDD

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] enbyecho@lemmy.world 105 points 3 weeks ago

Please tell me this is fake. Please?!?!!??

True story: I once worked for a startup where the head of HR kept a spreadsheet he called his "naughty and nice" list. For every employee he had a score that boiled down to "risk to the company". He would send out surveys like this and say things like "your feedback is strictly confidential", then use the responses to determine people's scores. Of course other things like any kind of complaint he overheard went into it too.

[-] 2pt_perversion@lemmy.world 54 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

It seems that it's most likely an out-of-touch marketing stunt. The company, Yes Madam, is apparently launching some sort of corporate wellness program type thing so they are likely going to pivot this publicity into "Treating employees like that would be awful right?! But companies do have stressed employees and should take care of them with...blah".

I hope it fully backfires and they go out of business.

EDIT: It just hit me that they are going to say "We didn't have a single employee who indicated stress on the survey, because we take care of our employees."

load more comments (5 replies)

Years ago I heard this story about a company in India that held a fire drill. Once everybody was gathered outside, they made the announcement that for about a third of them their key cards wouldn't work anymore because they were fired. My colleagues from India at the time said that sounded very real.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] lunarul@lemmy.world 20 points 3 weeks ago

The only thing I could find is that Yes Madam is a real company and that the sender is indeed the HR head of that company. So if it's fake, someone kept the header and signature of a real email. Or maybe a real email sent on April 1st? I have a hard time believing that this is real (not that a company wouldn't do this, but the fact that they would admit to it so blatantly like it's not a bad thing).

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] s3p5r@lemm.ee 88 points 3 weeks ago

And they just included them all in the 'to' instead of bcc. Very professional.

[-] huginn@feddit.it 22 points 3 weeks ago

That email is company wide, not specific to those fired

[-] Canonical_Warlock@lemmy.dbzer0.com 84 points 3 weeks ago

Yes, but you always BCC large groups like that to prevent reply-all disasters.

[-] Gork@lemm.ee 25 points 3 weeks ago

I was once on a massive reply-all chain. Most of the emails were "stop replying all!" But one made me chuckle. "I like these emails it makes me feel important."

[-] scytale@lemm.ee 24 points 3 weeks ago

My favorite was when someone from HR finally replied and asked everyone to stop replying to all or else. Then one guy replied “Ok” to all.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] huginn@feddit.it 18 points 3 weeks ago

100% - it's obviously a company run by slack jawed morons but the original comment had assumed it was only those affected getting the email, which is a different context

[-] Stovetop@lemmy.world 18 points 3 weeks ago

It's normally standard to send mass emails using BCC to avoid someone using the Reply All button to spam up people's inboxes.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] spujb@lemmy.cafe 74 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)
this is ~~likely~~ satire/a publicity stunt by the way

edit: proof. trust your gut yall.

[-] markstos@lemmy.world 44 points 3 weeks ago
[-] spujb@lemmy.cafe 25 points 3 weeks ago

id believe it if there was a single outlet doing original reporting :/ all of them are just reading verbatim the same screenshots we have here. some of them bother to put the word “allegedly” in.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[-] Heikki@lemm.ee 72 points 3 weeks ago

Every company I've worked at sends these surveys out and says they are "anonymous". I never respond to them.

  1. If they are truly anonymous, why does my boss personally call me out to respond to them? I know it may track if you have submitted the survey. If it has that capability, then it can track you.

  2. I don't want a "moral boosting" pizza party. Give me more time off or more pay.

[-] rhacer@lemmy.world 19 points 3 weeks ago

Recently at a company town hall, "please respond the anonymous employee satisfaction survey."

My boss a couple of weeks later, "HR says they need more surveys from our group. Please encourage your teams to fill them out."

Yeah, completely anonymous.

[-] Kichae@lemmy.ca 16 points 3 weeks ago

And why is the url they send always "website.com/survey-name/[random hash]"? Why are there trackers on this totally anonymous, fo sho, survey link?

[-] Blackmist@feddit.uk 57 points 3 weeks ago
[-] normalexit@lemmy.world 46 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

And no one gave critical/constructive feedback ever again. Mission accomplished!

[-] superkret@feddit.org 42 points 3 weeks ago

We did it, Patrick! We solved workplace stress!

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Infomatics90@lemmy.ca 36 points 3 weeks ago

I have seen the exact same behavior here Canada with companies that are led by Indians. They treat it like a sweatshop. and this was an office.

[-] Blackmist@feddit.uk 18 points 3 weeks ago

There was quite a few in the UK as well, mostly in Leicester (large Indian immigrant population there). People being paid £3 an hour when it should have been about £8 at the time.

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2022/jun/13/poor-working-conditions-persist-in-leicester-garment-factories-finds-survey

If you buy cheap clothes from the likes of BooHoo you should know that they're made in these places, and if you buy expensive clothes, then they're probably made in the exact same conditions with a nicer label sewn in the back and a better PR department to handwave away any wrongdoing.

load more comments (11 replies)
[-] jinarched@lemm.ee 33 points 3 weeks ago
[-] paultimate14@lemmy.world 24 points 3 weeks ago

This has got to be from The Onion... Right?

[-] Im_old@lemmy.world 15 points 3 weeks ago

More like the onion banji

(Ba-dum tsh)

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] choco_crispies@lemmy.ml 19 points 3 weeks ago

So fucked up

[-] menemen@lemmy.ml 18 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

This is wow, I mean we are used to a lot, but wow.

They also write "100% Purely Bhartiya Brand" on their (really terrible) page. I am not indian, so I might be wrong, but this raises some questionmarks.

[-] odium@programming.dev 28 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

If anyone has questions about what bhartiya means, it means Indian.

So the whole phrase means 100% purely Indian company. Equivalent to the phrase 100% purely American company.

In both countries, this could indicate alignment with the ultra nationalist party in power who have been espousing a push to produce goods within the country instead of importing from china, or just a normal support local businesses thing.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 09 Dec 2024
1253 points (100.0% liked)

Work Reform

10186 readers
589 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

Our Goals

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS