379
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] IDKWhatUsernametoPutHereLolol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 79 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Fault is on everyone

  • Non-voters and trump voters

  • russian propagandists

  • "useful idiots" telling people to not vote harris for perceived evil

  • democratic leadership for not having a better platform

  • Kamala Harris, who just cant stop getting pulled towards cheneys like a magnet

  • Joe "I don't wanna quit yet, even tho I'm old as fuck" Biden

  • republicans, who just want to destroy democracy

Everyone is at fault

[-] PugJesus@lemmy.world 41 points 1 month ago

Miserable, isn't it?

People want one easy foe to blame, and to exonerate all other forces. Tribal mentality. Absurd from a supposedly educated modern population, but here we are.

Nearly everyone who had a serious hand in this election is guilty for this fucking debacle. Some by action, some by inaction; some by malice, some by incompetence, some by ignorance, some by sheer fucking stupidity.

What a fucking shitshow this all was. And will be for the foreseeable future.

[-] PugJesus@lemmy.world 55 points 1 month ago

PROTIP: Dems being spineless, brainless cretins does NOT absolve anyone who said that sitting by and letting fascists take over the country was preferable! And yes, you CAN blame the voters for that!

The voters did not magically come to the 'correct' decision to sit this out by the spirit of democracy whispering in their ear; they did so because they believed that fascism won't be 'that bad' to them, personally! And no amount of blaming Dems for being gutless corporate weasels can change that being an accomplice to deliberately driving fascists deeper into power is not a forgivable offense!

[-] cygnus@lemmy.ca 32 points 1 month ago

PROTIP: Dems being spineless, brainless cretins does NOT absolve anyone who said that sitting by and letting fascists take over the country was preferable! And yes, you CAN blame the voters for that!

I realize how old-man-ish this will sound (although in my defense I am literally becoming an old man) but there's a widespread lack of personal accountability these days. Everything must always be someone else's fault.

[-] PugJesus@lemmy.world 21 points 1 month ago

It's an ancient problem. But it's always frustrating to see it.

[-] FourPacketsOfPeanuts@lemmy.world 30 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

As a Brit I'm not immersed in American politics day to day. My (unqualified) take from a million miles away went:

"Oh, Joe Biden got elected thank god"

"Oh, he's promising to only serve one term, good that's completely sensible"

"Joe's running again? What? Could they not find anyone better? This isn't going to go well at all..."

"(during that debate) Oh well, looks like Trump's going to win.."

"Hey, Kamala looks like she would have won if this had been the plan from the beginning, not a sudden fumble when Biden's brain melted beyond repair on live TV.."

Seems like - from my point of view- the main culprit was hubris on Biden's part ever attempting a second term. And the inexplicable failure of the whole party to not force him out of that self destructive choice. Other candidates besides Kamala likely could have won, just seemed like any Dem candidate would be fatally undermined by starting a late campaign.

[-] PugJesus@lemmy.world 19 points 1 month ago

You're not wrong. Biden never formally promised to serve one term, but heavily implied it. Many of us were disappointed when he announced he was running again, but conventional political wisdom that the incumbent has a massive advantage was still a compelling argument. For an incumbent to be forced out is nearly unheard of in presidential politics.

Even after the debate, I was willing to lend Biden the benefit of the doubt insofar as I considered him to be doing what HE believed to be the best chance of winning. When I learned that he had internal polling showing a total massacre long before the debate, my opinion soured from "Idiot, but I get it" to "Narcissistic moron who lost the country to fascism".

Harris started with strong support she could have, potentially, won with, but in the process of 'defining' herself to the electorate, chose what she saw to be the 'safest' choices in a attempt to not lose that lead. Unfortunately, that lead was largely built on possibility, and in the process of defining herself, especially defining herself in the 'safest' possible way, obliterated the ability of all people to see her as all things, and cratered her chances of success. She would have probably had more success with at least a vague argument of change rather than "I can't think of anything I'd do differently [than Biden]", even if it created bad blood between her and the president. Whether that would have been enough to win, God only knows, but I think we can all look back and say, at this point, that the 'safe' choices were not, in any way, safe.

[-] FourPacketsOfPeanuts@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

Tbh honest I was surprised Biden was even a consideration back in 2020, he was too old even then and it made the criticisms of Trump's age and mental health not land so well. The moment it was a close call in 2020 the plan should have been 'popular dem by any means necessary'. Not, double down on aging incumbent when they rarely do better on re-election. I can't tell it if was hubris or a complete failure of the party apparatus to believe it could come up with someone more appealing than Trump..

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] mlg@lemmy.world 24 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Pug its only been a month

Go back to sleep and enjoy the last month of Biden doing fuck all about any of the core problems that Trump is about to expand a thousand times.

This meme even contradicts itself. If its already known there's a limit to reason, why didn't the Democrats utilize this like the Republicans did? Obama lied about a ton of crap to get votes and everyone was still happy. All of a sudden the DNC has moral compass that prevents them from properly pandering to voters but full send genocide is worth losing all three branches of the federal government over.

[-] Rakonat@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago

Do people not realize that without legislative backing the President's powers to make long term and lasting change are extremely limited and nil? Like how he pursued student loan relief and got blocked by the Supreme Court?

Biden has never had a true majority in Congress, the senate was always 50/50 at best and even then two of those were DINOs with one of them fully switching to GOP in the last year. Scream all you want about Biden not doing anything but there really isn't anything else he can't legally do without Congress or Supreme Court just stopping his plan before it can even be publicly known. You want to see change with an actual leftist government in the US? Then fucking vote. Not just every 4 years in Presidential elections. but in midterms and special elections too. Find out who your state representatives are and vote in those elections too. If you don't know who represents you from the local level of city council all the way up to US House and Senate then you've really got no room to criticize the DNC for being paralyzed in not wanting to upset the voters they actually can get to turn out to the polls.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] PugJesus@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

This meme even contradicts itself. If its already known there’s a limit to reason, why didn’t the Democrats utilize this like the Republicans did?

Because the Dems are fucking morons. This isn't an excuse for the Dems. This is a reminder that voters are at fault too, and that allowing fascism is not magically okay just because the Dems are spineless gutless weasels.

[-] pyre@lemmy.world 21 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

(TLDR the first two paragraphs this turned to a novel of a rant)

this is stupid as fuck. no. it's on the dems. the reason they lost is because they don't mind losing. they're corporate cunts anyway, if they're not in power they'll still be comfortable so why even pretend to challenge the status quo and possibly scare away your bribers?

fuck no. the american people are stupid, yes, but it's not like that's genetic. they've been undereducated, overworked, constantly distracted and endlessly bombarded with propaganda for decades at this point.


politicians are allowed to work for companies they regulate and regulate companies they used to work for. they're allowed to be bribed legally as long as you call it lobbying and don't have "I will pass this law in exchange for this money" in writing. they're allowed to lie to the public without consequence.

the media is allowed to lie without consequence even when it's provable that they know they're lying. every day for years. lie. lie. lie.

the dumbest fucks alive are allowed to homeschooled their children and make sure their kids are at least as dumb.

not that schools are perfect. they are allowed to push religion and politics over science. meanwhile churches are allowed to give political sermons and still keep tax exempt status (technically not but in practice they are).

even with all this brainwashing it's not like people are allowed to think for themselves for a minute let alone research shit and stay on top of political issues. wages are ass and lots of people have to work multiple jobs. even if they don't companies aren't mandated to have PTO, not even for federal holidays. they're not mandated to raise wages either, even though rent always keeps rising.

just in case some people still might feel a bit too comfortable most are also blessed with crushing debt for the garbage education they got and the healthcare industry is just waiting for the chance to fuck them over if they ever dare get sick, let alone have an accident. you're not allowed to think, you're not allowed to breathe. work. crash. consume to feel barely good enough to keep working.

and on top of all of that, even if you manage to get through all that hurdle... voting is a privilege, not a right. especially if you're likely to vote blue, the system is in place to make your chances to vote as low as possible.

and even then, you have the electoral college and the senate to make sure a bunch of rock and dirt has as much say as millions of people on one side. which leaves tons of people to think why even bother?

so with all that, when everything is bad, and everyone is lying, as one of only two eligible parties you can't just throw your hands up and say "why aren't people more educated?" IT'S YOUR FUCKING JOB! people are hurting and one side is saying "hey I know everything sucks and you don't know how anything works so here's an easy answer: it's black and brown people" and the other side instead of correcting THAT, they're trying to correct THE PEOPLE and their justified feelings about how everything sucks and say "nah things are good actually"... fuck the democratic party.

[-] inv3r510n@lemmy.world 17 points 1 month ago

Yeah no. Fuck the democrats sponsoring a genocide.

[-] PugJesus@lemmy.world 17 points 1 month ago

Yeah, fuck the Dems. Still doesn't absolve any voter who thought that "More funds for the genocide + start a few others" was a good alternative.

[-] inv3r510n@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago

I have zero shame voting third party but do continue to attempt to shame voters for voting wrong and see how that works for you.

[-] PugJesus@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago

"I don't understand why minorities who are going to get the jackboot are so mad at me for welcoming the jackboot :(((((("

It's truly inexplicable.

load more comments (18 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[-] Anamnesis@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

Yeah, anybody who decided to set aside the genocide and vote for Kamala anyway should already have a very clear understanding of how Trump voters can dislike him in many ways but still vote for him.

[-] PugJesus@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago

Significantly less comprehensible and more relevant to this conversation is the idea that Harris was bad on Gaza; therefore, Trump, who was even worse on Gaza, should be elected.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[-] Maxxie 14 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I think those two statements are about two different things: on is about blame, the other is about course of action.

People who voted for fascists got duped/are into fascism, but you still have to convince them to chose otherwise because what is the alternative?

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] BigBenis@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago

The Democrats used to promise real change and progress, but they've only proven themselves to be the party of stagnation in recent memory. Nowadays they don't even try to inspire their base, but rather scare them into submission with the threat of Trumpism.

Sure it's better than the rapid decline into chaos that the order party is trending towards but this pattern of "a couple careful steps forward then a dozen strides sprinting backwards" isn't working for Americans. Many of us have lost faith in the system because the system doesn't work for us. What's worse is that when we get a candidate who speaks to us, the Democratic establishment shuts them down with more efficacy than they ever seem to direct towards any of the Right's regressive politics.

While I still fall in line and vote for somebody who I am not excited or inspired by in a seemingly futile effort to hold the line, many others have given up because their struggles aren't being addressed or even acknowledged. You can yell at them and criticize them until you're blue in the face but I can guarantee you they're either so tuned out that they'll never hear it or so dug into their own political ideals that they won't receive it.

If you want their vote, you're going to have to earn it.

[-] PugJesus@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

If you want their vote, you’re going to have to earn it.

"The Dems need to change" and "Allowing fascism is not okay" are not mutually exclusive positions, and I hold to both.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

No.

If you must vote and vote for the "correct" party then you don't have a democracy. Either we exercised our democratic responsibilities this year or we lost our democracy a decade ago and we're just now finding out about it.

Either way, lesser evil voting is not a democratic ideal.

[-] WrenFeathers@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago

lesser evil voting is not a democratic ideal.

Neither is staying home and not voting at all.

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

If you can't abstain then you don't have a democracy. (Yes Australia i'm looking at you) You have a system of coerced consent where the political parties wouldn't even know how to change, but that's okay because there's no incentive to change in such a system either.

It's literally the fastest way to get Party AB instead of Party A and Party B.

[-] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

Great you started with the conclusion that not voting is fine and then tried to find a way to justify it. You failed.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] PugJesus@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

If you must vote and vote for the “correct” party then you don’t have a democracy.

"Democracy is when I like the choices my fellow citizens make, and if I don't like it, it's not democracy"

Holy fucking shit. This is "Democracy is when GOOD, and non-democracy is when BAD" level reasoning.

load more comments (11 replies)
[-] splonglo@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

1 ) public ignorance is a widespread social force not a personal character fault that happens to individually affect the majority of the population.

2 ) This attitude of moral contempt is actively repellent to the people we need to reach out to, who do not subscribe to your premise. A lot of people don't think they are fascists - they are wrong, but they'll still look at you funny unless you can do a damn good job of making the argument. The Dems couldn't, the media couldn't, and nobody is watching it anyway. WE have to do it. Make better arguments and reach out to people instead of circlejerking and making our opponents arguments for them.

[-] riodoro1@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

Trump won. Deal with it and eat shit. Your political scene is a fucking joke and a plutocracy for sale regardless of who is at fault here. Any outcome other then setting the congress on fire is not a good outcome.

You don’t want to set it on fire? Then shut the fuck up already.

[-] zephorah@lemm.ee 7 points 1 month ago
  1. People are busy with more important things than social media, YouTube’s, podcasts, and news.

  2. People will vote with their communities to retain membership: MAGA, church, the family unit (sometimes).

  3. it’s not uncommon for 60% of people not to vote.

  4. Kamala didn’t distance herself from Biden. “They’re isn’t anything that comes to mind” was a coffin nail.

  5. DEMs don’t sell it well. The story told has to be big enough and potent enough to pull in 1, 2, & 3.

  6. What is the point of beating this dead horse? It solves nothing.

[-] Dupree878@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

I didn’t vote. That’s the democrats fault. They didn’t run anyone I would vote for in ‘16, 20, or 24

[-] PugJesus@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago

It's the Democrats' fault that you prefer fascism to spineless liberals?

[-] _cryptagion@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 month ago

If the spineless liberals are empowering the fascists even in years when they hold the majority, then there is no difference between the two.

[-] PugJesus@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago

"Both sides are literally the same"

How predictable. All of us who are going to suffer under the Trump regime thank you for being privileged as fuck.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] pjwestin@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago
[-] spongebue@lemmy.world 19 points 1 month ago

It's not even inauguration and we're going to have to deal with 4 more years of Mr. Trump's wild ride. Why wouldn't I "still" be upset?

[-] pjwestin@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

No, OP and I got into an insanely long argument about this exact thing yesterday that I'm honestly kinda embarrassed I engaged with for so long. Then i woke up to this meme, so...I guess he's still mad.

[-] spongebue@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

And yet, here you are still engaging in other places I guess 🤷‍♂️

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[-] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

A decent "party" would dispel "ignorance" rather than thriving on it.

That's completely within the bounds of reason.

[-] Zachariah@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

This is great. Needs a dash of misogyny though.

[-] naught101@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

Both can be true

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 03 Dec 2024
379 points (100.0% liked)

Political Memes

5657 readers
1336 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS