563
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] NutWrench@lemmy.ml 7 points 48 minutes ago

When are people ever going to figure out that Tesla's "autopilot" is a freaking scam?

[-] Iheartcheese@lemmy.world 6 points 48 minutes ago

6 months from now it will be illegal to report crashes involving these cars.

[-] b161 3 points 39 minutes ago

Anyone driving any kind of Tesla is a traitor to humanity. If people start spitting on you in public you know why.

[-] Ulrich_the_Old@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 hour ago

How about hiring people to drive the taxis.... Instead of hiring people to remotely drive the taxi... What exactly would be the difference??? Except actually having the driver in the vehicle is proven to work....

[-] kcuf@lemmy.world 5 points 59 minutes ago

You can hire someone in another country to drive remotely, so can find cheaper labor. They could also theoretically have them multitask driving multiple vehicles at once.

[-] Ulrich_the_Old@lemmy.ca 3 points 56 minutes ago

Driving multiple vehicles at once??? Would you take a taxi driven by a person in another country who was not paying attention full attention to the one you are in???

[-] answersplease77@lemmy.world 4 points 1 hour ago

Indian tech supports strike again

[-] NutWrench@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 hours ago

It is long past time we got over our child-like worship of billionaires.

[-] GenosseFlosse@feddit.org 11 points 5 hours ago

That's like a normal taxi with extra steps!

[-] lipilee@feddit.nl 13 points 7 hours ago

scammers pull the same shit over the world since the mechanical turk. at this point the joke's on us.

[-] merthyr1831@lemmy.ml 18 points 7 hours ago

This is gonna kill people from the input lag alone.

[-] medgremlin@midwest.social 2 points 32 minutes ago

There was an incident not too long ago where one of these robo-taxis ran a woman over to avoid another car doing something it didn't expect and then it froze up and wouldn't move at all with the woman trapped under the car. There wasn't a driver to get out and help and it took a few minutes for bystanders to get involved to help her, and she ended up dying at the scene.

If we can't get rid of these monstrosities, at least having a human monitoring them that can call 911 is important, but that still doesn't solve the problem of there not being a human present to render aid if something goes wrong. (Not to imply that every human will be willing or able to render aid, but some chance of help is better than no chance of help.)

[-] HellsBelle@sh.itjust.works 11 points 14 hours ago

ahahahahahaha!!

That's freaking hilarious. Muskie is an idjit.

[-] Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works 23 points 17 hours ago

Tesla would not be the first robotaxi company to use this method. In fact, it’s an industry standard. It was previously reported that Cruise, the robotaxi company owned by General Motors, was employing remote human assistants to troubleshoot when its vehicles ran into trouble (the vehicles appear to have run into trouble every four to five miles). Google’s Waymo is also thought to employ the same practice, as does Zoox, the robotaxi firm owned by Amazon.

Ah, the old mechanical Turk trick. This time with chance of man slaughter.

[-] tiefling 2 points 2 hours ago

Manslaughter is just an unavoidable risk in the name of short term profit, but we can counter it with thoughts and prayers /s

[-] Juliana@sopuli.xyz 10 points 17 hours ago

I thought the machine and Robot are gonna do everything lol

[-] Blackmist@feddit.uk 5 points 7 hours ago

That's expensive bro. Just get a poor person to do it for next to nothing.

[-] Juliana@sopuli.xyz 3 points 5 hours ago

Oh ......I'm not bro I'm a female 😊

[-] ChronosTriggerWarning@lemmy.world 7 points 5 hours ago

Hey, don't limit yourself! Females can be bros. I have a couple myself.

[-] WoodScientist@lemmy.world 35 points 23 hours ago

The self-driving taxis and humanoid robots companies like Tesla are developing are just a thinly disguised way of getting around immigration law. We're a very long way away from having autonomous humanoid robots that can clean your house for you. But one remotely piloted by someone in Bangladesh wearing a haptic suit? If the tech was cheap enough, that sort of thing would be profitable.

It's effectively an extremely perverse and exploitive form of immigration. When we bring immigrants in, they typically take low-level jobs. But they also get opportunities to advance themselves further. Moreover, in the US at least, any children immigrants have on US soil automatically become US citizens. So yes, immigrants come in on the bottom of the social ladder, but they have an opportunity to climb.

Here though? This is a way of getting all the labor we want from immigrants but without offering them the usual deal in return. And even worse, they won't even be owed minimum wage.

[-] Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works 8 points 17 hours ago

Not only that, there is now a middleman involved so the citizens still get screwed instead of being able to access cheap labour directly.

[-] pjwestin@lemmy.world 127 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Ah yes, you know what's better than a taxi driver? A taxi driver who relies on a camera with a limited field of vision, experiences input and video lag, and receives none of the tactile sensations that allow drivers to gauge road conditions.

[-] leftytighty@slrpnk.net 84 points 1 day ago

also one that has no personal stake in the safety of their driving

[-] kandoh@reddthat.com 22 points 1 day ago

This really just comes down to people in a certain income brackets are uncomfortable being in close contact with a working class person.

That's why they don't like trains, that's why they don't like taxis.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago

People who don't drive themselves will be responsible for the UI of all this.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Honytawk@lemmy.zip 19 points 1 day ago

So does he now want people working from home or not?

He's very inconsistent.

[-] Rozauhtuno 89 points 1 day ago

3 weeks later:

"Your honour, it was the ping!"

[-] Furbag@lemmy.world 2 points 15 hours ago

Objection! Speculation!

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] PennyRoyal@sh.itjust.works 111 points 1 day ago

“Remotely control”, or “drive” if you will.

[-] Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works 86 points 1 day ago

Only with worse vision, worse reflexes and probably worse pay

[-] Rykzon@discuss.tchncs.de 50 points 1 day ago

And without survival instinct or adrenaline to distract during decisions, great!

[-] ogeist@lemmy.world 1 points 10 hours ago

Crazy Taxi: The Movie!

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com 21 points 1 day ago

"How was your day, honey ?"

"I killed thirty people in a pile-up on Hwy74 remotely. I'll be a little late."

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Rhaedas@fedia.io 34 points 1 day ago
[-] InnerScientist@lemmy.world 24 points 1 day ago

And to quote the comic:

"Crowdsourced steering" doesn't sound quite as appealing as "self driving."

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] jeena@piefed.jeena.net 68 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Hey more jobs for taxi drivers and safer to do from the comfort of your home. Just like a drone pilot!

Who would have thought that Taxi drivers one day would be able to work from home?

[-] VerPoilu@sopuli.xyz 53 points 1 day ago

Lots of taxi drivers are already reckless. Imagine if they can drive remotely!

[-] jonne@infosec.pub 52 points 1 day ago

They'll be driving multiple cars at the same time, while drunk.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[-] Jocker@sh.itjust.works 18 points 1 day ago

I'm in, with generations of GTA experience

[-] 2pt_perversion@lemmy.world 40 points 1 day ago

Waymo is doing the same. Mostly self-driving but when they get stuck a human at a help center takes the sticks. There are a lot of edge cases in the real world so it makes sense to just have the car programmed to be very conservative and let a human deal with it.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 28 Nov 2024
563 points (100.0% liked)

Not The Onion

12401 readers
1986 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Comments must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS