152
submitted 1 day ago by WeUnite@lemm.ee to c/politics@lemmy.world

Sorry it's a few days late, I just saw this and thought it was really interesting.

top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee 58 points 1 day ago

The dems checked out of this fight.

She's in Hawaii, and the dems who lost are not showing up for judicial appointments, and they are barely squeaking by.

They talk a big talk but are absolutely limped dicked when it comes to actual fighting.

[-] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

Where did you see they aren't showing up for judicial appointments? I haven't seen that anywhere. Quite frankly I've seen two articles saying the opposite

https://www.cnn.com/2024/11/20/politics/judges-trump-biden-missing-senators/index.html

https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/4998960-senate-republicans-frustrated-judicial-nominees-vance/

It's why Trump is calling for his followers to slow the process

https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/reversal-thune-seeks-slow-bidens-judicial-nominees/story?id=116010653

[-] Gointhefridge@lemm.ee 55 points 1 day ago

Falling on deaf ears at this point. The ~~controlled opposition party~~ Democratic Party has already handed the keys to the kingdom to ensure a smooth transition of ^unchecked^ power.

[-] SnotFlickerman 46 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

People forget that Biden wrote the PATRIOT Act. Which opened the door to unprecedented spying on US citizens.

"It's a big club, and we ain't in it."

[-] Gsus4@mander.xyz 31 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

If trump and the project 2025 architects are as dangerous as they say and I believe they are, they have been extremely limp-dicked and complacent from Biden saying he was gonna "give it his best" to his shit-eating grin "welcome to the white house" to trump.

Something is off here...

[-] CasualPenguin@reddthat.com 3 points 12 hours ago

The majority of the American people voted for project 2025 to run the US... What do you want him to do? It's the will of the (very stupid and bigoted) people

[-] Gsus4@mander.xyz 3 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

Yeah, but he didn't have to be cheery about it like it's nothing and they were bullshitting about him being a fascist all the time.

PS: ok, it seems to be a nonchalant "tis but a scratch" reaction to incoming doom.

[-] reliv3@lemmy.world 2 points 11 hours ago

Hmm, careful. It was not a majority of American people. Trump didn't win over 50% of the popular vote, and this doesn't consider the people who did not vote.

[-] MegaUltraChicken@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago

this doesn't consider the people who did not vote.

If you chose not to vote or vote for 3rd party, you supported Trump.

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 28 points 1 day ago

I'd be interested to see what the 600 "bullet ballots" in Maricopa County are all about. As a hotbed of election denialism and a swing state it'd be interesting to see if there really were that many people who were only interested in voting for president and nothing else.

[-] Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

Talk to people. This is actually fairly common. Many people don't follow politics closely enough to make informed decisions about ballot questions, and plenty of others simply don't care. Lots of people couldn't name the mayor of their town, their US Representative, or even their Senators. Plenty of people will go there to vote for one thing and ignore the rest because they either don't know or simply can't be bothered.

If I recall reading correctly, I think the average for this is about 1-2% of voters per state. I know there's some controversy because that number is higher in battleground states, but these are Trump voters we're talking about here, and I could easily see them turn out in droves for their god-king and ignore the rest of the ballot, because the only thing they cared about was getting Trump back into office. No reason for a Trump voter to do that in California, because it isn't going to matter. Pennsylvania is a completely different story, which is probably why we're seeing it happen so much in battleground states.

this post was submitted on 20 Nov 2024
152 points (100.0% liked)

politics

19118 readers
2638 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS