1342
New Superhero (lemmy.world)
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] egrets@lemmy.world 115 points 10 months ago

Issue #1 or 5? You decide!

This got a bonus chuckle from me.

[-] Gork@lemm.ee 91 points 10 months ago

Can Trolley Man at least multi-track drift?

https://files.catbox.moe/g2xmi6.jpg

[-] RmDebArc_5@sh.itjust.works 11 points 10 months ago

I keep seeing this image, were ist from?

[-] Shardikprime@lemmy.world 22 points 10 months ago

Initial D parody.

While you are at that... https://music.youtube.com/watch?v=j0QSrhGw4cU

[-] Shardikprime@lemmy.world 53 points 10 months ago
[-] AllHailTheSheep@sh.itjust.works 24 points 10 months ago

yes, if you change the problem, you change the way we respond. that's why there's so many trolley problems spin offs in the first place

[-] mariusafa@lemmy.sdf.org 23 points 10 months ago

The artist just immortalized in a strip that does not understand the trolley problem.

[-] dragonfucker@lemmy.nz 19 points 10 months ago

It understands it just fine. Agency is not a factor in the decision. The choice between action and inaction doesn't matter. People think it matters because people are driven by shortsighted emotions.

[-] drake@lemmy.sdf.org 7 points 10 months ago

I think the thing that people often don’t seem to understand about the trolley problem is that it doesn’t have a “single version”, it’s a framework for exploring human decision making. And the correct answer, it’s all a matter of perspective. For example, if all of drag’s friends were on one side of the track, and on the other side of the track, were a number of people who drag does not know, equal to the number of drag’s friends plus one, would drag kill their friends, or the innocent people?

[-] dragonfucker@lemmy.nz 3 points 10 months ago

Drag's friends. Drag has at least ten friends probably, and drag's friends are at least 10% better than the average rando. They're mostly communists and queers. The world is better off with them in it than with some random people who are probably capitalists.

[-] drake@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 10 months ago

Thank you so much for being honest about making that choice - almost everyone would choose their friends, but lots of people wouldn’t admit to that. Being honest myself, I’d make the same call - and if it came down to me picking between my friends and drag’s friends, I’d choose my friends. The whole “calculus” we run (comparing how good our friends are to average people) is a way we justify making our decisions, a way to deal with the cognitive dissonance of our values (save as many lives as possible) being in conflict with what we actually do (saving our friends rather than as many lives as possible). In reality you would have no way of knowing who those other 11 people would be - for example, if I said that one of them is a researcher on the brink of curing cancer, how would that change your decision? These are really tough questions to deal with, and that’s the point of the trolley problem - that people make different choices because they have different perspectives, and different values. There’s no objectively right and objectively wrong answer to any of the scenarios. Just different interpretations and ways to think about it.

[-] dragonfucker@lemmy.nz 3 points 10 months ago

Drag chooses to kill those people because drag knows nothing about them. Drag just assume they're randos. And on average, people suck. Drag's friends are great people.

If drag knew more about the people, the equation would change. Drag finds it difficult to reason seriously about a scientist discovering a cure for cancer, since there's no such thing. There are hundreds of cancers. There's no one solution for all of them and there never will be. We'll need hundreds of cures for cancer, many of which we already use today.

If we went with a more realistic scenario, like "one of those people will be the leader of the USA's communist revolution", drag would be much more willing to kill drag's friends. Drag might also commit suicide about it, though, so maybe the numbers aspect is equal anyway. Would drag give drag's life and all drag's friends' lives away for a communist America? Probably, but drag would sure like some assurance it's going to be proper anarchist communism, and drag wants to know if another leader could have taken that place. Does drag even believe in the "great man" approach to history, or is there no such thing as such a leader? Is there nobody that important?

[-] drake@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 10 months ago

That’s perfect, drag, I don’t think anyone could have put it better. The trolley problem is a philosophical thought experiment, yet so many people approach it like it’s some sort of engineering problem that has right and wrong answers, I think it’s probably a consequence of our sort of “tech bro” culture that everything needs to fit into this rational, quantitative framework - we have this drive to put numbers on things that just can’t be rationalised in that way.

People are funny, complicated things, and I love them all!

[-] tetris11@lemmy.ml 6 points 10 months ago

Agency might matter depending on societal context. 5 hot guys might be worse than 1 hot guy in a world with limited resources, for example.

Everyone knows that 5 of something is usually better than 1. The dilemma comes from finding a situation where that might not be true, and therein exploring some quirks of our own humanity.

It goes too far when people interpret these quirks as fundamental human traits, but there is genuine merit in testing oneself with fun hypotheticals

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago

So philosophical debate on this topic is meaningless, because utilitarism is obviously correct?

Please take off your clothes and lay down here, I have five patients in desperate need of organ transplants.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] uis@lemm.ee 5 points 10 months ago

Entire thing is analysis paralysis. There always some information that will change desired outcome.

[-] drake@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 10 months ago

Don’t bother trying to explain philosophy directly to people online. We’re so convinced of our own intelligence that we refuse to consider that our knee-jerk reaction to anything might be worth exploring.

If you want people to learn anything, you have to first of all tell them that they’re right, then add whatever you’re trying to teach them as if it’s some nuance of whatever they’re right about. Even if it makes their original opinion completely wrong. It works surprisingly often.

Our egos have an outer layer of armor that prevents us from easily absorbing ideas unless they have a starting point of agreeing with whatever we already believe.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] rockerface@lemm.ee 52 points 10 months ago

Still saves more lives than Homelander

[-] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 35 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Isn't Homelander a villain though? I thought he was supposed to be a villain.

Edit: NM I didn't realize Homelander was from The Boys. I honestly thought he was the guy in Guardians of The Galaxy 3

Edit 2: Apparently that character's name is Adam Warlock.

[-] Pieisawesome@lemmy.world 23 points 10 months ago

SpoilerHomelander is the villain in the boys.

[-] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago

Ahh, kk. Never seen it, but I guess the two characters seem similar in that respect at least.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] bizarroland@fedia.io 6 points 10 months ago

I remember reading The Infinity gauntlet comics and in it Adam warlock was supposed to be the greatest human being ever created.

And then they picked the actor that they chose for him and I'm just not seeing it.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] TOModera@lemmy.world 27 points 10 months ago

It's close to the second ghost rider (and maybe the first, been awhile since I dug up my old comics) who didn't have powers until innocent blood was spilled (though typically it was the villain who spilled it).

[-] sundrei@lemmy.sdf.org 25 points 10 months ago

Ugh, this guy's gonna be a problem.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] TwoBeeSan@lemmy.world 21 points 10 months ago

The Dave Chappelle bit about Bill Cosby being a superhero.... but he rapes.

[-] Shardikprime@lemmy.world 17 points 10 months ago

The best part is that, by refusing to be killed themselves, they are making a choice to let the other people die, rendering their hypocrisy evident and their worry fully rendered moot

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] boert@sh.itjust.works 15 points 10 months ago

I just played this as a board game with my friends. They decided that pineapple on pizza is worse than Donald Trump. My hope in humanity is shattered.

[-] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 17 points 10 months ago

That is crazy. I can't think of any part of Donald Trump that I would want on my pizza.

[-] boert@sh.itjust.works 2 points 10 months ago
[-] _cryptagion@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 10 months ago

How democrats unironically viewed the election.

[-] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago
load more comments (16 replies)
[-] SomeGuy69@lemmy.world 10 points 10 months ago

I want more of this. Reminds me on the anime Darker than Black, where those with power always had to fulfill some contract to use their power, else they'd die.

[-] pastermil@sh.itjust.works 5 points 10 months ago

Man, this anime is so underrated. I like it a lot. I question the artistic direction on the second season, but at least the ending wrapped up the whole show nicely.

A little correction, nobody really know what happens when a contractor doesn't do that side-effect thingy. It is never mentioned if they would die, nor that it's even implied. The way I see it, they'd simply develop strong impulse to do so.

[-] No_Money_Just_Change@feddit.org 8 points 10 months ago
[-] palordrolap@fedia.io 11 points 10 months ago

And here was I thinking that this character was so terrible that it caused Stan Lee to spontaneously spring back into existence in order to make that opinion known.

[-] sukhmel@programming.dev 8 points 10 months ago

Also a spin-off where Trolley Man cures incurable patients one by one using sacrifices of 5

[-] SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

Just put explosives collars on a bunch of murderers and rapists. Need superpowers just press a button and kill one murderer off.

[-] veganpizza69@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

"collateral damage"

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 15 Nov 2024
1342 points (100.0% liked)

Comic Strips

19596 readers
965 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS